in the offtime... i play some music

July 29, 2009

I have a duo with my good friend eric gunther
We just finished this album called Music for Nothing
(note, not Music for Nothings).

It has guitars, ukuleles, rhodes, ice cold droplets of water,
thousands of little static-bugs, robotic crickets,
heavy breathing, men masquerading as schoolgirls,
and some bloody crunchy beets.

But really, it's quite pastoral. Kermitesque you might say.

All the necessary links are at…
www.gloobic.com

Or if you want to go straight to the source…

iTunes link

Thanks for listening.
We'd love to know what you think!

boranj,
gloobic

Sharing a cosmic perspective.

June 24, 2009

For a lot of us involved in the scientific community, we know of and internally feel the beauty in science, but oftentimes take it for granted (maybe because it's a part of our daily experience). We need to remind ourselves to change this habit. In every moment, if we look deeply enough, the beauties inherent in the universe around us manifest. It is we that change, that see this beauty one moment and not the next, based on our current state of mind, literally. We are the limited ones, stuck in organism's bodies struggling to survive - the magic and majesty in the universe extends way beyond the human body and has for almost 14 billion years! The fact that science has figured out any of the structure of the universe speaks to the amazing extent of the human brain; we are lucky we can understand any of it!

Our massively limited perceptions and sensations, which usually last about 80 years, are structures weak at grasping the depth of the structures of the universe. There are animals on the planet that excel at every single sensory experience we have [a dog's smell, a mantis shrimp's sight, etc], except for our ability to process these sensory experiences into complex patterns with our brain.

But we can still feel it, and the more we remind ourselves of these structures in the universe, the more it has the potential to bring us a sense of spirituality, in a very similar sense to Buddhist philosophy: there is extraordinary power in transcending thoughts of the self. It is possible we waste a lot of needless energy over-worrying about ourselves. And these transcendent thoughts (altruism, nurture, service) really have the power to make us feel larger than just our human bodies. Check out this video by Neil-deGrasse Tyson on the hugeness of science, the spirituality of science. Really beautiful and inspiring.

--

Danielle Applestone has been one of my best friends for over a decade now, a kindred spirit who has always seen the depth in the arts and sciences, and connections between the two. I've seen her go from an undergraduate to now raising a 4-year-old, which has been beautiful and illuminating. Her challenge in many ways, and I assume a challenge for many parents with scientific backgrounds, is how to talk to their young children about the 'big questions:' where kids come from, sex, where everything came from, more sex. When are they ready for this information? How real can we be about it? What is the truth, and can truth change based on the age of the child?

We talk about this regularly, and she writes some entries about the process on our design company page, Plebian Design. Rather than go into anything much on my own, I thought I'd reference one of her amazing posts, talking about the realization of death with a then 3.5 year old child. To be sure, he's a precocious guy, but I do believe conversations like this can not only apply to children of many ages and backgrounds, but they can set up the next generation to not only realize that science can offer beauty and comfort in its answers to the big questions in life, but we can also admit that our answers are never really sure, but are in the process of being discovered, always. Most scientific theories are revised; often scientists hold as strongly to existing theories as some do to religious dogma, and both potentially cause suffering.

Here it is, Danielle's post about Grandpa's Information. Let us know what you think, and if it speaks to you - if it does, she has more posts on the general blog page.

Can we even imagine what would happen if the next generation of children is brought up to feel this sense of awe and oneness with the universe, through the pursuit of knowledge?

boranj,
jeff

Paradox of Choice

June 17, 2009

I've finally had a couple days to let my taking a leave of absence from school settle. The die has been cast; I am welcome back later but am officially no longer a graduate student. The time away has already allowed me to step back a little and try to regain a new perspective since, at least for the time being, I am neither studying nor filming. I literally wake up and can do anything I want for a few months; funny to realize that that freedom is there if we want it [past a base level of economic stability] but the daily patterns in a Western environment keep lassoing the brain back into a 9-5 mindset (or in filming, 7-9!).

There's an amazing psychological phenomenon known as the 'paradox of choice': that, contrary to folk wisdom, having more options actually makes us quite a bit less happy. I've been trying to run three careers (host, phd student, science/artist) at the same time, dealing with the first half of the paradox: choice paralysis. The existence of more choices causes more hesitation and stress over the making of that choice. I don't think I'll ever be able to decide just one path; two days into it I'd wonder what would be happening along another path. We all deal with this in our own ways.

Secondly, the existence of more choices actually makes us less happy. The brain is this ultra-powerful strategizing machine, creating parallel scenarios, playing them out in parts of our body, judging their fitness for our lives. And if you are given 500 choices of shampoo, you end up sadder than when you only had 5 - even if you would choose the same shampoo. The existence of choice allows the brain to think of so many scenarios, that after you've chosen, there's that many more ways that might have ended up going better for you. The brain is not very happy with that!

There's a great TED Talk available online by the author of 'Paradox of Choice,' Barry Schwartz. The TED conference, 'Ideas worth spreading,' follows the awesome collaborative model of having the best scientists give the best talks and releasing videos of the talks all for free on their website. Contrary again to popular folk wisdom, this is a case where giving the information away for free is priceless - their ticket sales have risen, if anything, by the enormous exposure generated by viral videos. And so many more people are exposed to the ideas worth spreading!

--

Within the production of Time Warp, I have struggled with the level of science we are able to translate to a mass audience. The editorial decisions are not up to me in the end, but I do spend most of my waking time strategizing all the possible options and paths this show could take, which can easily lead to frustration (choice... see above). To add to that, I get letters almost daily from scientifically-minded fans, asking why there isn't more science available on the show.

I've gone through many similar thoughts about the level of science. But one thing I've realized, and it's something I think well worth considering: most people in this country do not care about science. The educational system does a dismal job of preparing our children to possess an emotional connection to science. It prepares them to be able to 'do science' as if it's a form-letter, a known product. But science is a process of discovery - it can be as fun as going to the beach, as varied and complex as life itself, as emotionally rewarding as any act of creativity - it is, to me, the act of creation.

I do this show to attempt to spread the emotions that can be gotten through the process of doing science. And this makes many people that are already emotionally connected to science disappointed because we don't cover all the topics they want to see. But we're reaching this gigantic group of people, who might only peripherally care about science, and thus this show has an amazing niche to function as a show that helps people start to care about science. Start to think science is cool. Start to realize that the universe was not made for us to understand - so it's going to have its challenges; but questioning and attempting to understand something so much bigger than ourselves can deepen the meaning in our everyday lives. That science is a process, not a product.

These are the people I would like to reach most!

Time Warp is all about taking things outside of the human perceptive and perspective range, and bringing them closer to a form we can process. So I'm trying to keep that perspective myself, and think about how we can evolve the show slowly into a form that can please everyone more. I have some ideas, and want to take the next few months to develop them and judge their fitness. I have meanwhile been on Twitter, trying to share ideas as they come. Please feel free to join in the conversation! (I just wish they would change their tagline from 'What are you doing?' but 'What are you thinking?' or 'What are you feeling?' - such deep potential in that tool to bring people together...) The conversation should be like information itself - open source, fully collaborative. I am open to your many ideas - how should this show evolve?

boranj,
Jeff

Happy 80th birthday EO Wilson!

June 10, 2009

Every day that passes, I am more emotionally, spiritually, taken by the depth and beauty of understanding that science has given us in the last 400 years since its inception. I think often about how important the sciences, and the love of the sciences, are to our future as humans on this planet. My main interest in working on a TV show such as Time Warp is in its potential to help us all see the beauties that science can reveal. My inspiration in this wouldn't exist without guys like EO Wilson.

Today is EO Wilson's 80th birthday. Wilson began with research into ant behavior [and superorganism behavior], which later spread into studies of sociobiology, which attempts to show that social behaviors have evolved because of the evolutionary advantages those behaviors may have. In some sense, it says that 'human nature' is a real phenomenon - contrary to the previous belief that the mind starts as a blank slate.

Like many great science thinkers and writers, Wilson was led to these gigantic game-changing ideas based on very specific research done with ants. Wilson has ants and ant behavior, Dawkins has genetics, Sagan has astronomy. The greater success seems to come from very focused work in a specific field - after decades of this work, we see how these thinkers realized that their specific research resonated cosmically - that the patterns emerging in a very specific context, were indeed patterns reflected in many aspects of our universe.  The self-similarites inherent in the universe are mind-boggling indeed. And we'll never know where they will arise, without looking deeply enough into a specific topic to see how it abstracts.

Below is a video with EO Wilson. It's beautiful to see how the natural childhood passions, which I believe are inherent in all of us, when promoted and allowed to be set free, can continue forever - the curiosity that evolved in us over hundreds of millions of years, to allow us to better master our environments, wants to keep us kids throughout our lives. Our fears about the future can only stunt its growth. I am constantly inspired by people such as EO Wilson - if I can do anything on this show, it is to try to spread the passion that has been given to me through exposure to these people. It is contagious.

Season Two has left the building

June 03, 2009




As of this weekend, we have finished filming the rest of Season Two for Time Warp! I'm pretty excited about a lot of the opportunities we had this time around - including Metallica, Penn and Teller, and Blue Man Group - the latter of which is included in this flickr slideshow:

I'm looking forward to the time off for a while; we should have about 3 months down, assuming we get picked up for a third season [still unknown]. I will finally get to work on some of my personal projects, including some open source sculptures I'm working on with Dan and Eric, and an upcoming album that should be up within the month. Given the rough scheduling, it's become clear that I will be unable to continue both my PhD program and Time Warp at the same time, so in the next week I need to decide between the two - one has got to go.

On the one hand, I believe my research for the Phd [studying possible connections between technology and neurotheology] has the potential for deep, lasting importance to others. But I cannot do both, and this opportunity for a show comes along rarely. This makes the decision pretty tough! The TV show has potential to reach millions, but I'm still trying to figure out how I fit into this world - there's about 50 people necessary to make Time Warp and I am only but a cog in a very large wheel. I can also go back to school.. but TV waits for no man. At least not for me!

If anyone has any thoughts about it, please let me know!

High-speed video competition 'Speed of Life'

May 29, 2009

IDT, a high-speed video company, is hosting a high-speed video competition, where you can win a new model N-3 camera, which can record up to 65,000fps. You need to have some access to a high speed camera already because the competition requires 250fps or higher video.

Check out video samples from IDT Here, especially this one of flipping ATVs!

Their press release below. Submissions will be due August 21, 2oo9. Check out details at Speed of Life.

Boranj,
Jeff

--

Integrated Design Tools, Inc. (IDT) announced the launch of a video contest like no other. Aptly named The Speed of Life, the contest is only open to high-speed video clips of 250 frames per second (FPS) or more. Contestants will compete to win the “N-3,” a compact and fully autonomous camera capable of more than 65,000 FPS. Online entry is open until Aug. 21, 2009, and IDT expects entries to be “captivating.”

With the popularity of the Discovery Channel’s “Time Warp,” the high-speed world is gaining attention. IDT hopes The Speed of Life contest will further this industry’s awareness, honoring those who film outstanding moments in time. With that, there are no specific categories for skill level or content submitted, since organizers agree that high-speed technology tends to make anything relatively interesting.

The victor, selected by online votes and a panel of industry experts, will be announced in November during the VISION International Trade Fair in Stuttgart, Germany. Along with the sought-after N-3 camera, the winner will receive the title of “The Speed of Life Inaugural Winner.”

The Speed of Life contest rules state that video files must be no more than 60 seconds in length, and at least 50 percent of footage must be filmed using high-speed (250 FPS or higher), digital technology. Voting will be open Sept. 1 – Oct. 20, 2009, and organizers encourage participants to build their armies of followers now. For details and submission, visit IDTvision.com. Find high-speed video examples at YouTube.com/user/IDTvision.

On the set with the Fuel Girls

May 06, 2009

Who doesn't love girls on fire? (when safe, of course) Thought I'd share some shots from the second shoot with the Fuel girls, this time with some fire stunt specialists who have developed 'Fire Gel', allowing you [when properly coated in the stuff] to be lit on fire without feeling a thing. Have a look!


On the Set with Cirque du Soleil, 4.27.2009

May 03, 2009

Had the awesome opportunity to visit Cirque du Soleil's "O" show in Las Vegas, to film some of their acts in slow motion. What a great experience! Wanted to show some photos from the day, so here they are. Click on any to get a description and see full size.
Boranj,
Jeff

April 29, 2009 - Filming with Penn and Teller!

April 29, 2009

I realize more and more that I can be conscious and explicit of trying to get better at the process of hosting this show. I'm a scientist, not a normal tv show host, nor do I want to be. But I do want to consciously utilize the people in the world around me to help me get better - to learn from anyone and everyone that is interested in that process. Later today an episode is airing with Metallica as guests, which was a mindblowing experience, but I realized the next evening, when watching their video S+M with the San Fransisco Orchestra, that I now appreciated their work on a completely different level, and it would have deepened my enjoyment of the opportunity with them, if I just knew more about what they did and found different ways for us to connect, and for them to connect with others.

I'm in Las Vegas, and later today I'm going to be filming Penn and Teller. So I'm sitting, brainstorming about the things that Penn and Teller really mean to me; I've known their work for a long time and long been a fan, but now I have a few [I think 5] hours to talk to them, and to try to have as interesting an interaction with them as possible. It's almost guaranteed that 4 of those hours will be consumed with the technical issues of getting shots. And I'm starting to realize, with help from several of my friends, many different directions I could connect with them, in the roughly one hour of time to just interact. So I'm going to use them as a starting point and I'm going to brainstorm a bit. I film tomorrow and I am going to try to check the blog and if anyone has any thoughts I am more than happy to try to incorporate them.

On set, April 22

April 23, 2009

Yesterday we had a great opportunity to mix up science and art - dropping different objects into different fluids - something that sounds everyday and boring, but is anything but! I've included some pics below of the experience, including our guest Tadd, who some may remember from Season One when we did a segment on underwater bullets.

The DP Wes with Tadd and his kids, and a shot of Tadd's fam hangin on the couch.

Some shots during shooting:

This footage looks way more amazing than most people would appreciate, even sometimes ourselves! Looking at some clips with the director John Tindall and the DP Wes Skiles.

In preparation for an upcoming shoot, the art department is casting body parts in plaster... and don't mess with Louie, one of our ACs, he's a monster on the mic.

dancing kids and mirror neurons

April 21, 2009

Check out this video of a Funny Dancing Tomato Kid - a child who clearly has no professional training in the dance world, but possesses an uncanny ability to get at some of the [difficult!] moves that he saw in a music video.

Recently, scientists have found evidence that we [and higher animals such as some chimps and possibly some birds] possess certain neurons in our brains that we call 'mirror neurons' - neurons that fire when both when an animal performs an action, as well as when the animal observes the action being performed by another animal. This is pretty crazy. Through photons that enter your eye, a chain reaction is triggered that fires a group of neurons - the same neurons that you would use to make your muscles move in the same way you just observed! Then again, all muscle action comes from the brain, which is triggered through input sensory streams, an amazing process in general.

For this kid, dancing is a completely natural event - we are evolved to enjoy things such as rhythm and movement, and especially patterned movement such as in dance [the scope of that is way beyond this entry]. Stick out your tongue at a baby, and you will quite often receive a stuck-tongue right back 'atcha. A baby that has not yet even developed a 'sense of self' as we achieve in later childhood, can still incorporate the actions of others for its own development - and in fact, this is thought to be one of the major keys to our superiority as a species in the planet. Apparently, the ability to internalize actions immediately [on a chemical level!] allows much more efficient cultural learning: see one person who has learned a skill, and you can map it onto your own body almost immediately. This child is acting in ways 99.99% of species on the planet are unable to do. And we take for granted that we can do this!

This process does not even need to be fully conscious - if you've ever watched a sport, live or even on tv, and when someone made a motion your body responded similarly, it's quite possible that this effect was caused by your mirror neurons at work.. however, no definitive findings have yet been reported - we'll have to wait and see. A potentially huge advantage to humans in our species development still remains an unknown in science.

For a more detailed article about mirror neurons, check out VS Ramachandran on edge.org, a neurologist who is a proponent of the mirror neuron theory and its potentially huge importance.

Why is science important?

April 20, 2009

John Conway is a particle physicist from UC Davis, working on finding the smallest particles known to man. He is one subject in the recent documentary film The Atom Smashers, one film I was asked to jury recently at the Olomouc International Festival of Popular-Scientific and Documentary Films.

Scientists often have a hard time communicating the importance of science to lay people - and lay people often see no use to science; this film highlights that common tension from a variety of viewpoints. I particularly enjoyed one quote of Conway's that I thought I'd share.

"Imagine you live on a planet, and the planet's shrouded in clouds. You never see the sun, you never see the stars. all you know is every 24 hours, it gets light and then it gets dim and dark, half the time it's light and half the time it's dark.

Suppose humankind had evolved on such a planet, and then we start sending up probes into the clouds. First a mile high - nothing. We find nothing, just more clouds. Ten miles high - still find nothing. Suppose these clouds are 100 miles thick, we still send a probe, we've now gone three orders of magnitude; we've found nothing.

Maybe it takes sending them 1000 miles high, you break through the clouds, you see the sun, and the stars, and the universe. And you learn what this thing is you're on, this planet. You know it's a sphere, but you don't know what else is out there.

Humankind could've evolved this way. and we could be this way with respect to the particles that we know about. It could take orders of magnitude more energy before we get to the next layer of structure.

We don't know where we're at, what the universe has in store for us. But we'll do our best, nature gives you what she has and our job is to find that out. we're after the truth."

I'm very interested in people's thoughts about the importance of science. I see this show primarily as a means for people who aren't interested in science to get a first taste as to why it could be so amazing, so enjoyable, and how it creates a never-ending cycle of deeper and deeper appreciation for the things in our world. Science, to me, is magic - it is our method for predicting the future.

But how do we make others realize the importance of understanding our universe?

Time Warp episode 2x01: The Story of Universal Gravitation

April 08, 2009

Our senses are designed specifically to not take notice of things, when those things are omnipresent. All sensory systems exhibit adaptation - if you walk into a room and smell it, you are unlikely to notice ten minutes later. The brain is designed to focus attention on changes in its environment. We get stuck in certain thought patterns based on the contexts in which we live, because they comprise our everyday experience.

We are designed to take things for granted, and so we do. This is one of the reasons Newton's discovery of the law of gravitation was so spectacular. He had to break with one of the most fundamental parts of our daily lives to realize that what he saw in front of him was the same thing that governed the heavenly bodies in space.

--

Almost 150 years earlier, the entire world still took for granted that the Earth sat motionless at the center of the universe [geocentrism]. The Sun revolved around the Earth. Everyone 'knew' that this was reality. But in 1543, Copernicus published his 'On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres,' in which he tabulated over a thousand years of astronomical data to show evidence that the Sun was indeed the center of our solar system [heliocentrism]. This was such a gigantic mind-shift in the populace that it is considered the catalyst for the scientific revolution. All based on his use of mathematics to revolutionize what everyone took for granted.

Copernicus gave us a completely new vision of our place in the universe, and its workings.

Galileo worked with this data almost 70 years later; still heliocentricity was not the common view, as it disagreed with many things the Church took for granted. But, with a telescope that he built himself, he noticed Venus, and could see it in all of its phases [just like the moon]. This, along with his discovery of four of the moons orbiting Jupiter, lent a new slew of evidence for heliocentricity; this created such a revolution that he was under house arrest for the last years of his life. Scientists don't have it good in our culture now, but we're doing better than we were! Here Galileo, one of the first real 'scientists,' shows us a fundamentally new truth about the universe, one that impacts every one of our lives on a daily basis [whether conscious or not], and he was forced into isolation for it.

In both of these revolutions, at one point in history there was a single person on this planet with a new, ultimately life-changing piece of information. How slow this information used to spread, before the internet!

Galileo had shown more evidence for the heliocentricity of the solar system, but still no one understood why these bodies moved around in quite the way they do.

The genius of Newton was realizing that when you drop an apple, it falls because of the same reason the moon stays in orbit. People saw things falling for 200,000 years before anyone realized this was true!

--

Newton's law of universal gravitation says that every two things in our universe with any mass attract each other. This means the Earth is pulled toward the Sun, and the moon toward the Earth, but also that you are being pulled to your computer screen as you read this. And you are being pulled towards stars millions of light years away.

The big leap in logic is the realization that when an apple falls, it falls because the Earth and the object are pulling -each other- with the same exact force. Now, since the Earth is about a trillion times the mass of the apple, it moves a trillionth as much, but it does move toward the apple!

Aerodynamics is one aspect of falling objects that makes universal gravitation seem so complicated. It predicts that any two objects will fall at the same speed, because they are pulled with the same acceleration (g, about 10 m/s) toward the surface of the Earth. But in reality, objects fall at completely different speeds, because they fall through the medium of air, which creates a huge amount of drag. In some sense, these more advanced topics of aerodynamics required understanding before gravitation could be fully understood - this fact still causes many problems in introductory physics, since dropping a feather and a stone next to each other do not seem to follow the universal law of gravitation!

The discovery of the universal law of gravitation revolutionized our understanding of the world just as Copernicus and Galileo had done before - but what Newton showed us is that the laws governing the far off world of space are the same that govern our behaviors at home.

In some sense, the first scientific question we ever asked is: "Where are we?" and it is a question we are still working to answer.

--

Try this at home: If you have kids and haven't watched the show yet, drop some things from different heights of different weights, and talk about why they fall at different speeds, and in fact, why they fall at all! How do these objects falling relate to the moon holding itself in orbit around the sun?

a birthday poem

March 18, 2009

A poem I originally wrote for the director of photography Wes Skiles, for his birthday - I am a fan of making more explicit the reasons a birthday is something to celebrate.. thoughts? I am always up for revising this...

--

Birthdays

The fundamental unit of time is not the second, but the day.
Every measure of human time is based on when we have light, and when it is dark.
Every rhythm in our lives is determined by the fundamental rhythm of the rotation of the Earth,
    and our daily view of the Sun.
There was a time in our history when we knew 'day,' but not 'year.'
Every 365.24 days, we appear at a reference point in space.
It helps keep perspective on gaining wider feedback loops,
    of seeing our thoughts on multiple levels,
and how it is the process, not the result, to value.

How better to celebrate our lives
than to celebrate the journey around the source of our lives - marked periodically?

--

In case you hadn't heard, the original 'Happy Birthday' is copyrighted. We have been initiating a campaign to try to create a new, better, a copyright-free birthday song, please check it out and drop any suggestions you may have.

Open source hosting: the bathroom

February 27, 2009

Next week we are planning a segment on bathrooms, and how germs spread. We are going to cover the typical interesting elements like electric toothbrushes, showerheads, etc.. and look at how germs spread
over time using a variety of new [for us] techniques such as ultraviolet imaging and hopefully some microscopy timelapse. If anyone has any thoughts about things we might incorporate into such a segment, please discuss them below. Also if you have in this case comments about this crowdsourcing idea in general, I welcome them... getting better at the process is a conscious part of the process.

I am fully convinced in the power of collaboration over competition as a valid method for society. Collaboration can aid all of us. Open source is a very powerful process, and it is the process and not the product that we can reward [ironically, to get the best product!].

I cohost a TV show that I genuinely hope helps people to see that science adds to the beauty in our lives. I do this because I feel that science and technology truly have the potential to help the world, on its deepest levels - from solving the environmental crisis, to moving us forward to world peace and mutual understanding, to raising our enjoyment of the world around us. With more heads on the job, won't we improve?

This is one reason we have a forum. It enables a completely unfiltered dropbox of ideas, so that we may learn from all of you. We have used many, and will use many more. But, the forum is only one possible channel for collaboration, and depending on use can be very one-directional.

So let's try to establish some additional levels of dialog. I'd like to open source some of the thoughts I have about upcoming scientific segments. Sometimes I'll know the general topic, and not have any specific starting points, sometimes I'll know more details about what we'll be attempting [and sometimes I won't be able to share publicly] - but either way, if anyone has any good ideas and leaves a comment, it gives us the opportunity to incorporate the idea into the segment. It is not about me, it is about the show and its potential for the beauty in science to reach people - and it will do so better if it is a collaboration. We will consider anything left as given of free will, owned by no one, and make no promises to incorporate anything, but obviously, if the idea fits, we will want to turn it into a reality. And this will benefit everyone.

Paintball

January 20, 2009

Everyone makes mistakes. We are no different, but we hope to fix them as soon as possible rather than trying to cover them up. 

As a science show, the last thing we want to do is spread false information, especially when it is safety related. But in the unfortunate massively-deadlined world we live in, things get through that never should. Our paintball segment received a lot of feedback after its airing: In our rush to get this segment out, several things missed our proper attention.Paintballin_3

The sections regarding the scientific facts and safety issues in the paintball segment have been re-edited. Projectile speeds, potential injuries, and the wearing of proper safety equipment have all been remedied. I'm very grateful for all the feedback that came back through the forum, personal e-mail, etc. - without it, we wouldn't have known what was wrong, and we'd have had no way to fix it.

One of the most powerful aspects of science is its love of dynamics. I do not mean dynamics in the sense of loud or soft, but in the stressing of change. Science resists change, as we all do. But it revels in it as well.

With every new discovery, some part of an earlier theory is laid to rest. Newton's laws provided the basis for all of physics for over two centuries - only then did we find that they were not universal, specifically at the very small and very fast scales [quantum mechanics and relativity]. The power of science truly comes from its ability to update itself, to render earlier versions of itself outdated.

That said, we will surely make mistakes in the future. I hope that people will continue to give us feedback, and we will continue to try to get everything as straight as possible. We're looking forward to working with you!

(Picture of my swollen head post-paintballing, shown for reference - can you guess where I got hit?)

Why?

December 23, 2008

True science is not measured by its successes, but by its ability to learn gracefully from its failures. I want this blog to be a direct, real-time line to communicate with people who care about the show, and what's on it. I'm interested in people that are interested. We all want to make it better.

Time Warp lives inside the context of television. It therefore has the ability to reach multitudes of people, and a responsibility to do so in the most positive way. Time Warp can show the beauty of science, but must do it in a universally accessible way. This show has the potential to change the minds of people who normally don't think of science as something that's cool or something in which they can take part. It is both!

Such is the aim of this blog. In order to make Time Warp as effective as possible, this blog will focus on several areas:

- Techniques to explain scientific concepts across in interesting, fun, and new ways

- In-depth science that did not make it into segments, and ways people can explore phenomena on their own - especially with their kids.

- Putting science into a form where people, especially kids, see from the beginning that science is a positive force in our lives, is exciting, can increase the beauty we find in everything around us, and is the best method we have to solve the problems in our world.

I look forward to comments!

Best-
jeff


Jeff Lieberman will blog about experiments done on the show “Time Warp” and the science behind it.
Advertisement

>
SITE SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
CREDITS DCL |
DISCOVERY SITES Discovery Channel / TLC / Animal Planet / Discovery Health / Science Channel / Planet Green / Discovery Kids / Military Channel /
Investigation Discovery / HD Theater / Turbo / FitTV / HowStuffWorks / TreeHugger / Petfinder / PetVideo / Discovery Education
VIDEO Discovery Channel Video Player
SHOP Toys / Games / Telescopes / DVD Sets / Planet Earth DVD Sets / Gift Ideas
CUSTOMER SERVICE Viewer Relations / Free Newsletters / RSS / Sitemap
CORPORATE Discovery Communications, Inc / Advertising / Careers @ Discovery / Privacy Policy / Visitor Agreement
ATTENTION! We recently updated our privacy policy. The changes are effective as of Tuesday, October 30, 2007. To see the new policy, click here. Questions? See the policy for the contact information.