This (will be*) just in from NASA: You can help decide which object the Hubble Space Telescope will photograph by casting a vote.
Your choices? Six pretty nifty objects, all of which Hubble has never before imaged, in celebration of the International Year of Astronomy (Galileo's 400th anniversary of using the telescope to peek up at the stars).
The contest ends March 1 and the winning shot will be taken during the 100 Hours of Astronomy celebration, which is April 2-5. So don't delay.
Vote and ye shall be rewarded -- maybe. If you give your e-mail address after voting, looks like you'll be entered to win one of 100 big posters of the winning shot.
At any rate, here are your choices:
Star-Forming Region: NGC 6634
 |
Planetary Nebula: NGC 6072
 |
Planetary Nebula: NGC 40
 |
Spiral Galaxy: NGC 5172
 |
Edge-on Galaxy: NGC 4289
 |
Interacting Galaxies: Arp 274
 |
Ok, let's back up for a minute.
1) Why only six things?
A good question, indeed -- I asked it when I first heard about this from my Super-Secret Inside Source, aka "SSIS." I said there should be 10 objects. Twenty. Hell, put up 50 or 100 to pick from!
But alas... SISS told me that there were originally nine targets to choose from, not more because Hubble will have only that many good/bright objects to photograph from April 2-5.
The NASA folks organizing the contest decided three of the nine were too dim to measure up to the photographic caliber we now expect from Hubble (we're a bit spoiled). So there ya go.
2) Why are these black and white images?
I know, right... yuck. But SISS said to give each thing a "fair chance" the team used only grayscale pics.
While you won't find many or any super-high-resolution images on the 'Net (again, Hubble has not photographed these), there are a couple of decent color images out there if you're curious. I recommend using Google image search (e.g. this one on NGC 4289).
3) What did I vote for?
I don't think I'll skew the results, but I'm rooting for planetary nebula NGC 6072... there aren't any really great images of it yet (I wonder why), and the definition in the preview shot on the site looks rather tantalizing.
And who doesn't dig the fiery remains of a dead star?
Happy voting!
* NASA hasn't put out a release as of the time of this posting, but others** have posted about it, so I'm following suit.
** I see that Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer himself, has beat me to the punch on this; his post = 12:01 a.m. ET today. But that doesn't surprise me -- Phil used to work with the Hubble Space Telescope... so he inevitably has an army of SISSies on hand. Wish I had me some more SISSies!
Photos: youdecide.hubblesite.org
Recent Comments