12 posts categorized "Terrorist Attacks"

12/27/2012

Cyber Attack on Iran a False Alarm

Msf3-hashdump_small

On Tuesday of this week, the Iranian Students' News Agency (in Farsi) reported that a "Stuxnet-like" computer virus had appeared again, this time infecting systems an Iranian power plant instead of a nucelar power facility. The story also said the attack was repelled. Western news outlets, such as the Associated Press, picked up the story.

Ali Akbar Akhavan, head of Iran’s Passive Defense Organization, said he was misquoted, and only said that the country was ready to confront such attacks. The ISNA later published a story (in Farsi) saying that no attack had occurred. The incident raises the question of just how concerned others should be about that kind of attack. (Full disclosure: I ran both Farsi stories through Google translate).

ANALYSIS: How Do You Hack Into a Phone?

Stuxnet is a piece of malware discovered in the summer of 2010. It attacks industrial control systems built by Siemens, called supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA). Most of the infected computers were in Iran.

While this latest attack appears to be a false alarm, it isn’t as if Iranian officials are being needlessly paranoid. Iran has weathered other cyberattacks, such as one earlier this month from a virus named Batchwiper that simply wipes data.

Back in April, another data-destroying virus called Wiper attacked Iranian businesses. Viruses similar to Stuxnet, such as Duqu, which performs reconnaissance, have appeared in the wild.

The original Stuxnet attack is widely believed to have been created by either Israel or the United States. It attacked centrifuges used to purify uranium, causing them to malfunction and fail. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is geared to power plants, while the United States and Israel insist the Islamic state is bent on producing nuclear weapons.

The Iranian government has been more pubic about its capabilities in cyber-defense, and there has been open cyber-warfare in a few cases, such as in the 2008 conflict between Russia and Georgia, in which Georgia accused Russia of targeted attacks on government computer systems.

ANALYSIS: Silent Circle Promises Spy-Proof Calls

In the United States, the big concern is terrorism. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned of a "cyber pearl harbor" as recently as October.

But there's some question as to what a terrorist might do in the first place. If some malicious group found a way to disable a power plant, it isn't clear that anyone would think it wasn't a "normal" outage, and one that would likely be fixed relatively quickly.

The story does show that even rumors can spread fast. As any chess player knows, sometimes the threat of an attack is as powerful as the attack itself.

Credit: Wikimedia Commons



Email:


12/01/2012

How Syria Shut Down the Internet

By Ben Weitzenkorn, TechNewsDaily

Syria-internet
The Syrian goverment has cut off the Internet in a novel way.
On Thursday, all Internet traffic in and out of Syria suddenly stopped.

Syria isn't the first country to have suddenly cut its population off from the Internet, but the manner in which it did so may be unprecedented.

"Since the beginning of today's outage, we have received no requests from Syrian IP space," network-reliability provider CloudFlare wrote on its blog last night. "That is a more complete blackout than we've seen when other countries have been cut from the Internet."

Video Service Streams Live Reports From Syria"

The Syrian Minister of Information blamed the outage on terrorists, the Jerusalem Post reported.

"It is not true that the state cut the Internet. The terrorists targeted the Internet lines, resulting in some regions being cut off," he reportedly said, citing a cut cable.

As far as CloudFlare could tell, that was not the case. Instead, evidence suggests it was a planned shutdown by the government.

CloudFlare said when the outage occurred, connections to Syrian IP space were all withdrawn at the same time, effectively blocking all Internet traffic to and from the country.

Internet access in Syria is provided solely by the government-run Syrian Telecommunications Establishment.

There are four telecommunication cables that connect Syria to the Internet. Three are underwater and the fourth runs overland through Turkey.

However, CloudFlare doubts that the disconnect was performed physically.

"The systematic way in which routes were withdrawn suggests that this was done through updates in router configurations, not through a physical failure or cable cut," the CloudFlare blog said.

CloudFlare provided a video of the shutoff occurring in real time, letting viewers watch an entire country lose Internet access.

Nationwide Internet cutoffs were among the last-ditch efforts by Libya's and Egypt's former dictators to save their regimes before both fell during the Arab Spring uprisings last year.

More from TechNewsDaily.com

 

Copyright 2012 TechNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

11/28/2012

Aleppo TV a Syrian Lifeline: DNews Nuggets

Dnews-nuggets-278x225Aleppo TV a Syrian Lifeline: An underground television station called Aleppo Today has become must-see TV for Syrians who still remain in what was once the country's most populated city. The station has been broadcasting political reports since July, when Syria's civil war swept into the city. Now the station provides a constant live-stream update on the fighting.

The broadcast is simple, just music and still images. But running along the bottom of the screen is information alerting viewers to the movement of government tanks, strikes by air force jets, rebel offensives in the city and Internet delays. The reports come from more than 40 correspondents in Aleppo and another 30 reporters in the suburbs. According to WBUR, the channel is often blocked by President Bashar Assad's regime, but when that happens, the station moves their broadcasts to another channel and it doesn't take long for members of its loyal audience to find it. via WBUR

GET MORE MUST-READS HERE!



Email:


11/19/2012

How Israel's Iron Dome Works

Iron-dome-622

The conflict between Israel and Palestinian militants in Gaza has meant a test of Israel's missile defenses, a system called the "Iron Dome," which was built to protect Israel from short-range, unguided rockets on ballistic trajectories. Unlike it's name implies, the Iron Dome is not an actual dome, but a small, mobile arsenal that consists of a radar unit and typically three launchers capable of deploying missile interceptors and missiles. It was up in running for the first time on March 27, 2011.

Top 10 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Taking Flight

It works when radar picks up the signal of an incoming rocket -- most of which are unguided -- within an approximately 40-mile radius. The information is sent to a control center on a truck and operators check the trajectory of the rocket. If it's headed to a populated area or a military target, an Iron Dome missile, called a Tamir, is fired. This missile is guided and therefore more accurate than the attacking missile. A solider programs the Tamir with the incoming rocket's trajectory and then guides it with the help of radar. When the Tamir reaches the rocket, it detonates, destroying it.

There are currently five batteries of Iron Dome missiles deployed. As of this past weekend, the Israeli military reported that they had taken out hundreds of incoming rockets. Those that were headed to unpopulated areas were allowed to strike.

Iron Dome was developed by three Israeli companies: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems built the Tamir missile. Here's a promotional video that shows how the system works. Elta, an Israel Aerospace Industries subsidiary, designed the radar. Impress developed the command and control systems.

Hackers Cyberattacking Israeli Government Sites

Building Iron Dome was financed largely with aid from the United States, amounting to $310 million so far and another $610 million over the next three years, according to The New York Times.

One issue with the system is the high price tag. Each Tamir cost up to $50,000, while the typical Qassam rocket launched form Gaza is less than $1,000. That means that Palestinians can launch a lot more rockets at much less expense. Even if Israel were to deploy many more batteries, it's possible the Palestinians could fire enough rockets to simply overwhelm the interceptors.

via: Business Insider, NBC

The video below shows the system in action during a recent attack.

Photo: The Israeli army deployed a fifth Iron Dome anti-missile battery near Tel Aviv on Saturday after rocket barrages were launched at the city amid Operation Pillar of Defense. The IDF said the battery is estimated to have higher interception abilities than the previous four systems already in use, and includes an improved radar and upgraded interception software, enabling the protection of a larger radius. Credit: Xinhua/Jini



Email:


09/21/2012

Smart Buoys Could Secure Ports, Provide Wi-Fi

IDN Buoy Photo Potomac

Ensuring the security of oil rigs, ports and harbors isn't easy. Boats of all sizes sail in and out, and while radar can see most of them, it doesn't give details about who or what.

Intellicheck Mobilisa, a wireless technology company, thinks it has an answer. It's a buoy, outfitted with an array of communications antennas, a computer and various sensors. "In a way, this makes too much sense," Steve Williams, CEO, told Discovery News. "We wondered why nobody had tried this before."

To keep costs down, the company turned to off-the-shelf systems where possible. For example, the computer on board is similar to a high-end gaming machine. The real advances are in the software, which can recognize anomalies, and the way the buoys use communications frequencies and protocols. One of those is an algorithm used to pick up wireless signals over water -- unlike the ground, which absorbs many frequencies, water reflects them, sometimes confusing receivers. 

Top 10 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Taking Flight

Power was another problem. A buoy that needs batteries replaced or refueling isn't as cost effective as one that doesn't, so these devices are powered by a set of solar panels (the number is adjusted to local presence or absence of sunlight) and a wind turbine. Getting solar panels to work in a marine environment, Williams said, isn't always easy -- bird guano was a real problem until they put Bird-B-gone on the top of the buoys.

The buoy can communicate on cellular, satellite, or Wi-Fi networks, and can be equipped with cameras, infrared imagers and even sensors for radiation. They idea is to deploy small groups of these buoys in big harbors or near ports, such as Puget Sound or, as in a recent demonstration project for the Navy in the Potomac.

A typical scenario might be the buoys, which are linked to the shore via radio, would see a small boat approaching. That tells the computer to turn the camera in that direction, and show someone monitoring the image in real time. An infrared camera could show that there are several people on the boat, and the person monitoring would tell the buoy to approach closer, perhaps to check if there is any strange radiation from it or just to get a closer look.

That's a pretty straightforward monitoring system, but Williams said there's more to it. Because the buoys can communicate via 802.11.b -- Wi-Fi -- they can coordinate with each other and send data. So such buoys can also re-create a small Internet at sea. The U.S. Navy has been interested in using it as a communications system between ships, because by deploying several buoys, with one as a master control, it's possible for the ships to send data at the same speeds one might expect from a typical W-Fi- network.

That's a big upgrade from the typical systems, which rely on satellite links -- reliable as they are the amount of data that can be sent is very limited.

U.S. Navy Seeks First Shipboard Laser Weapon

The buoys might also do environmental monitoring. Williams said one partner was the University of Washington, which is interested in using them to monitor the environment in the Sound. Because they can send a lot of data, the number of sensors can be greater and the information can be retrieved in real time.

Williams said the first big customers are likely to be oil companies and the local governments that monitor them. The reason is that oil rigs need to protect themselves frm intruders and be able to see if wellheads, for example, are leaking. Governments in places such as Nigeria and Trinidad want to know that the oil companies are complying with local environmental regulations.

Credit: Intellicheck Mobilisa




Email:


08/16/2012

Get a Grip With the Ultimate Bomb Squad

Hand_ball-thumb-550xauto-98414

Part of what made "The Hurt Locker" so suspenseful was its element of humanity -- that the scenarios depicted on the big screen routinely happened in real life and are carried out by real people.

Had Jeremy Renner's character been played by a robot, I don't think the movie would have been such a blockbuster. Fiction is one thing, reality is another. That alone makes the Sandia Hand worth the price of admission. The robotic hand may not leave you on the edge of your seat, but when it comes to safely dismantling improvised explosive devise (IEDs), it gets two thumbs up.

PHOTOS: Top 5 Scariest Bioweapons

A lack of affordability, dexterity, durability and modularity have all prevented robotic hands from being more widespread in the military's explosive ordnance disposal units.

"Current iterations of robotic hands can cost more than $250,000. We need the flexibility and capability of a robotic hand to save human lives, and it needs to be priced for wide distribution to troops," Sandia senior manager Philip Heermann said in a press release.

Funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Sandia Hand project is different because it's modular. Various types of fingers can be magnetically attached to the hand frame. The operator controls the robot with a glove, giving the hand the flexibility and dexterity needed for delicate maneuvers. Additionally, the operator can quickly attach other tools, such as flashlights, screwdrivers or cameras to the hand. Sandia's durable outer skin covers a gel-like layer similar to human tissue, giving it an advantage when grabbing objects.

Researchers at Stanford University helped develop the hardware and consulting firm LUNAR helped reduce costs. With current robotic hands on the market, each "degree of freedom" costs approximately $10,000.

"The Sandia Hand has 12 degrees of freedom, and is estimated to retail for about $800 per degree of freedom -- $10,000 total -- in low-volume production. This 90-percent cost reduction is really a breakthrough," said Carl Salisbury, lead investigator on the project.

NEWS: The US Soldier: More Inspector Gadget, Less GI Joe

Heermann added:

"At this price point, the Sandia Hand has the potential to be a disruptive technology. Computers, calculators and cell phones became part of daily life and drastically changed how we do things when the price became affordable. This hand has the same potential, especially given that high-volume production can further reduce the cost."

Lest I forget to pay homage, I can't end this post without putting my fist in the air for a Bomb Squad enlisted in a different army of sorts. They may not have taken apart roadside IEDs, but they certainly dismantled some speakers in their time compliments of their explosive beats. Plus, they were "Louder Than A Bomb."

via Sandia

Credit: Sandia National Laboratories




Email:


04/26/2012

Ex-Neo-Nazis, Ex-Terrorists Get Social Network

Extremism-map-622

I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that most people aren't using their social network to rid the world of violent extremists. Sure, updating your Facebook profile with gloating posts about last night's epic rager and trolling for photos of your exes may seem like revolutionary acts, but let's be real, you're not exactly helping to stop the spread of Neo-Nazism.

PHOTOS: Top 10 Social Networking Sites

You know who is? The folks at Against Violent Extremism (AVE), an online social network where former violent extremists and victims can share their experiences. Its aim is to convince others to abandon or avoid falling prey to extremist ideology.

AVE is backed by a group of partners including Google Ideas, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), the Gen Next Foundation and Rehabstudio.

The idea arose from discussions at the 2011 Summit Against Violent Extremism, a conference hosted by Google Ideas in Dublin. The event demonstrated how perpetrators and victims of violent extremism can be very influential in deterring others from violence.

The organization believes the network can provide a new social scaffolding that those affected will be able to use to rebuild their life.

BLOG: 'Ninja Blocks' Ready To Restore Justice

"Often the key factor in turning an extremist away from violence is not so much challenging their opinions as meeting them with a nonjudgmental attitude and giving them a practical route to new friends, a new job and a new life. This is true whether you a talking to a former skinhead extremist or a former Islamic radical," Robert Orell told Wired. Orell heads Exit Sweden, an organization that helps rehabilitate former Neo-Nazis.

AVE will be operated by ISD, a London-based think tank with a history of working to counter extremism. ISD director, Sasha Havicek said AVE "won’t be another talking shop -- it will result in politcal outcomes."

Amen to that.

via Wired




Email:


02/23/2012

Terrorism's New Hot Spots: Rural Counties

6795597241_803c65028a_z

A while back, I suggested that because I hang my hat in rural Missouri, that I was somehow more immune to terrorist attacks. My argument was that the metropolitan intelligentsia on the Eastern and Western seaboards were likely bigger targets than us milquetoast Midwesterners with "low-sloping foreheads."

In effect, I was correct, as the majority of terrorist attacks have happened in coastal cities. However, researchers from The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) found that 65 out of the 3,143 counties in the United States were "hot spots" of terrorism.

BLOG: Your Privacy On Google: Don't Panic, Do Think

Researchers defined a "hot spot" as a county experiencing more than six terrorist attacks from 1970 to 2008.

While many urban counties have remained terrorism hot spots, researchers found that in recent years, smaller, more rural counties have emerged as hot spots of domestic terrorism.

For example, Maricopa County in Arizona has shown a spike in terrorist activity.

"The main attacks driving Maricopa into recent hot spot status are the actions of radical environmental groups, especially the Coalition to Save the Preserves," said Gary LaFree in a news release. LaFree is director of START and lead author of the report.

Considering START is a branch of the, shall we say conservative, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, naturally, the only group identified in the press release is a small-scale left-wing group of mountain-biking "eco-terrorists" responsible for burning down houses in an upscale Phoenix suburb.

Left off the Maricopa County list was self-proclaimed "America's Toughest Sheriff," Joe Arpaio who, besides his affinity for publicly humiliating those incarcerated under his jurisdiction, has been terrorizing the Latino community for years. But since the Department of Homeland Security has rather loose interpretations of human rights violations and terrorism, Arpaio's actions are par for the course.

BLOG: Will You Survive A Nuclear Attack?

"Despite the clustering of attacks in certain regions, it is also clear that hot spots are dispersed throughout the country," LaFree added, including "places as geographically diverse as counties in Arizona, Massachusetts, Nebraska, and Texas."

The report also found that, not surprisingly, most terrorist attacks were motivated by single ideological factors. For example, Lubbock County, Texas, only experienced right-wing terrorism while only left-wing terrorism was experienced in the Bronx, New York.

Despite us country mice now having to deal with more terrorists in our back yards, I still like to dance and sing in my kitchen to this song.

[Via Futurity]

Credit: START



Email:


01/26/2012

Airport Laser Lets You Keep Your Liquids

News_cobalt_airport_scanner

So, you're standing in the security line at the airport when you realize that bottle of duty-free Jameson is still in your bag. Also, you just cracked the seal on some not-so-easily-chuggable Kombucha. And that priced-gouged bottle of sunscreen you bought in Tulum? It was almost $10 and it's still nearly full.

Normally, these liquid-filled bottles would need to be surrendered to the trash can held by a smirking TSA agent. But have no fear frequent fliers, new screening methods may soon be clear for take off.

British company Cobalt Light Systems says they've developed a scanning machine that could put an end to those pesky restrictions that ban liquids in carry-on luggage.

NEWS: Are These Satellite Images Exposing America's Secrets?

Cobalt says their Insight 100 machine could analyze bottles as big as three liters for explosives and do it in less than five seconds. Here's how:

Bottles are placed inside what looks like a microwave oven, however this machine is no warmer of leftovers. Rather, a laser is shined into the bottle to chemically analyze its contents with a technique known as Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy (SORS). Energy levels in the liquid molecules are able to shift the wavelength of the laser light. From these small shifts, bottle contents can be determined.

BLOG: Police Want 'Drive-By' Friskings

Colbalt says the the Insight 100 exceeded the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) standard for use in airports with nearly perfect detection results and few false positives.

"We have worked incredibly hard over the last couple of years to refine the SORS technology and bring the Insight 100 to market," Cobalt's CEO, Paul Loeffen said in a press release. "It is a great achievement to have exceeded the European standards at this stage so that we are in a prime position to supply this unique bottle screener to European airports."

Don't live or frequently travel to Europe? Better double check what's in your bag.

[Via New Scientist]

Credit: Cobalt Light Systems




Email:


11/15/2011

Will You Survive A Nuclear Attack?

Nuke-blast-zone-622

Nabokov once described the region where I'm from in the Midwest as the three states beginning with "I." My adopted home state, Missouri, is widely regarded as a "fly-over state." And if you're erudite New York Times columnist, David Carr, the only waltz we know is the "dance of the low-sloping foreheads."

PHOTOS: How Nanotech Can Make A Better You

But I've got news for you jet-setting city-slickers looking down on us from the first class cabins of your coast-to-coast red-eyes. Once the nukes start dropping on metropolis, you just might find yourself knocking on the doors of us milquetoast Midwesterners. How come? Why not take gander at Google Maps-inspired website, Would I Survive A Nuke, and see how you and your fellow metropolitans will fair perhaps a 50 megaton Tsar Bomba detonates downtown.

If you survived, congratulations. If not, how about considering a move to my neck of the woods in Columbia, Missouri? Sure the website says I "live in the middle of nowhere," but at least I survived the Tsar Bomba attack on St Louis. However, with the oncoming nuclear winter, I'll need to brush up on my skiing techniques.

BLOG: Urban Nuclear Attack Scenarios Examined

Bad news, though, should a dinosaur-ending meteor score a direct hit. In that scenario, we're pretty much all toast.

[Via Gizmodo]

 



Email:


Categories

My Other Accounts

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2005