17 posts categorized "Oil Spill"

06/25/2011

Clean Swimming in a Dirty River

Plus-pool-aerial-556x450

No matter how hot it is outside, most people wouldn’t venture to swim in any of New York's rivers -- and for good reason. But with the ever-increasing list of things that may be lurking in the waters and harmful to our health, it’s time somebody gave us a break. That’s the gift architect Dong-Ping Wong and designers Archie Lee and Jeffery Franklin want to give New York City.

Plus-pool-skyline-278x225 BLOG: Roman Swimming Pool Found

The trio has designed a pool called +Pool ('Plus Pool'), which they hope will float in the Hudson River (and/or East or Bronx Rivers) by 2012. The floating pool, which is shaped like a '+' sign, would get its water from the river, but only after it passed through permeable walls that subjected it to three levels of filtration.

The first level is designed to block large contaminants such as debris, fish and sediments. The second layer is more concerned with small particles that make it past the first layer like algae and suspended particles. Finally a third filter is responsible for killing bacteria and viruses that are contained in the water.

BLOG: Zap! They're Dead. New Water FilterElectrocutes Bacteria

The design calls for quite a large pool at 9,000 square feet, which the designers think can be divided into a children’s pool, a lap pool, a sports pool and a lounge pool. Wong, Lee and Jeffery are currently looking for extra funding to make the project a reality. With any luck, New Yorkers might get a chance to cool off close to home.

Credit: Plus Pool




Email:


03/28/2011

Liquid Salt Extracts Oil from Sand

Oil-sand-650

A more eco-friendly method for extracting oil and tar from sand has been developed by a group of researchers at Penn State University. Utilizing ionic liquids to separate heavy viscous oil from sand, the team's technique could help reduce toxic waste from surface-minded oil sands and aid clean-up efforts after oil spills.

Tar sands, also know as bituminous sands or oil sands, constitute approximately two-thirds of the world's estimated oil reserves. Canada is the world's major producer of the unconventional petroleum from tar sands, and the United States imports more than 1 million barrels of oil per day from Canada, nearly twice as much as from Saudi Arabia. An estimated 32 billion barrels of oil could potentially exist in Utah's tar sands.

EARTH NEWS: Oscars Go Green with Docs Category

Extraction and separation of these deposits are often expensive and harmful to the environment because of they contain complex mixtures of sand, clay, water and bitumen, a "heavy" or highly viscous oil. Processing this mixture to fuel requires significant amounts of water and energy and generates contaminated waste water that is stored in open air ponds. Toxic to aquatic life, this waste water can seep into groundwater, polluting rivers and lakes. Additionally, local fresh water supplies can be depleted as this process requires large amounts of water.

However, the new method developed by the Penn State research team uses very little energy and water, and all solvents are recycled and reused.

Paul Painter, professor of polymer science in the department of materials science and engineering, and his team spent the last 18 months developing this new method using ionic liquids (salt in a liquid state) to facilitate the separation. No waste process water is generated since the separation takes place at room temperature.

"Essentially all of the bitumen is recovered in a very clean form, with no detectable mineral fines, which interact preferentially with the ionic liquid, and no contamination from the ionic liquid," explains Painter on his department's website.

The bitumen, solvents and sand/clay mixtures separate into three distinct parts. They can be removed separately and solvents can be reused.

This method can also be used to extract oil from beach sand after oil spills like the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez disasters. Using sand polluted by the BP oil spill in one experiment, the team was able to separate hydrocarbons from the sand within seconds. After a small amount of water was used to clean remaining ionic liquids, the sand was so clean could be returned to the beach, instead of landfills.

The ionic liquids researchers work with are based on 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium cations, a positively charged material with high chemical and thermal stability, a low degree of flammability, and almost negligible vapor pressure, which makes recovering the ionic liquid relatively easy.

The team has built a functioning bench top model system and is currently reducing their discovery to practice for patenting.

Image: Jupiterimages



Email:


11/16/2010

Vacuuming Up an Oil Spill

Oil_vacuum_cleaner

I've heard of a company making a vacuum cleaner from ocean plastic but not a realistic way to actually vacuum oil out of the ocean. A group of Norwegian grad students appears to have figured out a way to do it using a handheld device they invented.

Previously, Swedish vacuum cleaner manufacturer Electrolux brought attention to the massive volume of plastic caught in ocean gyres by making several concept vacuum cleaners out of marine plastic. Plus, MIT researchers came up with a design for a swarm of giant solar-powered robots that could pull oil out of the water around the clock using a conveyor belt-like system involving oil-absorbing nanofabric. The idea is great, but I really like what this group of Norwegians has come up with.

Several grad students at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology invented a vacuum device that can spit out bark or another material to absorb the oil, and then sucks the oil-laden material up. According to the university, the device is four times better at cleaning oil than conventional techniques. Grad students Silje Rabben, Marius Høver Montarou, Arne Sigmund Skeie worked with an oil spill manager to come up with a design that automates a process usually done manually: Putting absorbent material into the water, removing it, and then scrubbing down rocks by hand.

The students figured that plenty of oil-absorbing mateiral is already being used, including bark, peat moss and chemicals so why not make the process faster? Their vacuum weighs roughly 20 pounds, first shoots out the absorbing agent, and then brushes in the device's head rotate to thoroughly mix the material with the oil. Then a mechanism reverses it all, sucking the contaminated material back through.

I like that the device, which is called MOSE for "Mechanical Oil spill Sanitation Equipment", can also effectively scrub down oil-covered surfaces while it deals with the absorbent material. Perhaps this is precisely the device for the super material invented by nonwoven technologies professor Seshadri Ramkumar at Texas Tech University. His highly-aborbent biodegradable material is made from raw cotton with an activated carbon core to lock in mousse-like oil from spills.

The Norwegian students have already created a company, called Kaliber Industrial Design, to market their MOSE vacuum cleaner. Their design has already won several innovation awards in Norway. The only drawback I see is scale. Granted, the device is primarily envisioned as a solution for smaller spills like ones from vehicular or truck accidents, but it has portability that should only get better as the students work to lighten the design.

The massive, horrific Gulf spill isn't going to be resolved overnight. By the time the MOSE device advances, there will likely still be an equally massive need for it.

Photo: Norwegian University of Science and Technology grad student Silje Rabben at right demonstrates the oil spill vacuum cleaner she and several other grad students created. Credit: Nina Tveter/NTNU



Email:


10/14/2010

Scrubbing Micro-Bubbles Clean Polluted Lake

Micro-bubbles-650x450

Environmental remediation can take what feels like forever, and entirely removing an oil sheen from water is especially tough. An advanced technological process involving microbubbles could do the trick.

Micro-bubble-guy-278x225 Andy Hong, a civil and environmental engineering professor at the University of Utah, developed a process in the lab where polluted water or soil is infused with pressurized ozone gas microbubbles. The bubbles are smaller than those in standard ozone aeration, meaning they are extremely effective at turning oil droplets into chemicals that can easily get filtered afterward. Pressurization helps the ozone completely saturate the water.

  Last November Hong published his research in the journal Chemosphere but it has since come out of the lab and been applied to an extremely polluted lake in China. Lake Taihu, west of Shanghai and close to the city of Wuxi, is full of runoff from industrial sites nearby. Working with the Chinese environmental cleaning company Honde LLC, Hong is heading up a three-month project to test his process. The team is putting polluted soil in a "heightened ozonation treatment" reactor to break down hydrocarbons and remove metal contaminants, then lime is added to help filter them out.

Reactor_China The process has the potential to clean a range of seriously problematic pollutants, including oily water from drilling on land, groundwater containing the gasoline additive MTBE, wastewater containing pharmaceuticals, soil filled with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy metals and oil refinery waste.

If Hong can prove his technique at the lake, the university reports that he will try it in North America with help from a Salt Lake City investment firm that has licensed the technology. The U.S. could definitely use a hand. Over the past 15 years, the federal Superfund cleanup program has had few resources to deal with sites where responsibility was hard to assign or where the polluter had gone bankrupt. Hundreds of sites like this still need to be cleaned. Oh, and so does the Gulf.

We'll see if microbubbles will be able to handle mega jobs.

Photos: (Top) Professor Andy Hong with his reactor in the lab last year; (bottom) University of Utah engineers use the silver tank reactor on the left to clean soil from a lake in China. Credits: University of Utah College of Engineering and Honde LLC.



Email:


08/09/2010

Coal Plant Waste to Help Oil Spill Cleanup

Coal-plant-650x450
The good news is that the oil has finally stopped flowing in the Gulf. Now that BP has capped the flow, we still have a reported five million barrels of oil to clean up. So, how do we deal with it?

One researcher at the University of Central Florida has developed a way to treat waste material from electric power plants and use it to absorb the oil in the Gulf.

That waste material is better known as fly ash, a residue from the combustion of coal. The oil-soaked fly ash would be retrieved from the water in an inexpensive mesh packaging material, and then transported to a coal-burning power plant or other facility, where it would power production processes.

Sudipta Seal is the professor who developed this technique. In a press release, he says, "It’s a completely green process, very cost effective and easy to scale up."

Fly ash has already shown a lot of promise in this area, since it can clump oil that has washed up on shore.

This is just one of many ideas that are being pursued to clean up the oil spill. In June, I wrote about how BP had asked the public to submit ideas on how to stop and clean up the oil that had already flowed into the Gulf. Hundreds of thousands of laymen and experts pitched ideas.

A separate team of researchers developed a new material that could turn liquid oil on the surface water into a floating solid that could be easily scooped away.

Seal has teamed up with an expert on ceramic materials to further develop the fly ash, and prepare a process for deployment that can then be licensed to a commercial partner.

Photo: Don Klump/Getty Images


Email:


07/22/2010

How Do Oil Skimmers Work?

Oil-skimmer-650x450
On Wednesday, BP announced it has docked 600 oil skimmers in and around the Gulf of Mexico, reducing the cleanup flotilla to 1,600.

Oil skimmers enlisted to sop up an estimated 71.2 to 139 million gallons of oil spewed from the Deepwater Horizon site generally consist of equipment to corral the greasy pools and skimming mechanisms to suck up the oil-seawater solution.

According to the Associated Press, the ragtag armada has removed around 33 million gallons of oil across hundreds of square miles of oil-drenched water.

Due to the size of the Deepwater Horizon spill, oil skimming has been an all-hands-on-deck effort, comprised of commercial oil skimming vessels maintained by BP, other companies, private boats retrofitted with skimming equipment and oil skimmers maintained by the U.S. Coast Guard.

“The Coast Guard has 24 Vessels of Opportunity skimming systems strategically located throughout the country…and most have been moved down to the Gulf region in response to the spill,” said Michael Popovich, environmental equipment specialist for First Coast Guard District, District Response Advisory Team.

WIDE ANGLE: Get all the latest news and information about the massive oil spill threatening wetlands and wildlife on the Gulf Coast.

Following the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 required the Coast Guard and oil companies to maintain emergency oil skimmers, like the Coast Guard’s Vessels of Opportunity, in case of a similar environmental catastrophe. 

Yet, over the past 20 years, not much has changed about how oil skimmers work.

“(Oil skimming) is a mechanical means of removal, so there’s not a lot of high tech to it,” Popovich said. “It’s just a time-consuming process of trying to pick that oil up off the surface, and some skimming platforms are better than others.”

Since oil spreads over the surface of seawater, the skimming process usually begins by lassoing giant puddles of oil with floating barriers called containment booms. Then, skimmer mechanisms attempt to siphon oil from the water for disposal or reuse.

But smoothly separating fluids with two different viscosities isn’t easy.

“Even in the most ideal (weather) conditions, you’re still going to get a percentage of water and a percentage of oil when you skim,” Popovich told Discovery News.

To further complicate water and oil’s sticky relationship, the type of oil leaked and the amount of time it floats around impacts viscosity and, in turn, skimming success. Consequently, Popovich says the oil skimmers cleaning up the Deepwater Horizon spill employ a “multitude” of methods.

For instance, the Coast Guard Vessels of Opportunity use weir skimmer systems that collect oil using floating separators that disrupt the water-oil interface where the two liquids meet.

On the other hand, liquid separation skimmers promoted by actor Kevin Costner and recently commissioned by BP spin oil-water emulsions in centrifuges that essentially skim and separate at the same time.

In shallower waters near shorelines, belt skimmers attract oil with bands of oleophilic (oil-loving) material that are then squeezed dry.

“You have big plastic drums that rotate, and the oil adheres to it and you scrape it off,” said Tim Lindsey, associate director of the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center. “That’s pretty primitive technology.”

Lindsey has developed a prototype for a new floating telescoping weir skimming system he claims could dramatically improve oil skimming efficiency.

“The problem with most of the current (oil skimmers) they’re using is they have to come in direct contact with the oil to work,” Lindsey said. “You have to go back and forth across the water as though you’re mowing the lawn or vacuuming the floor, and when you’re in an environmentally sensitive area, that’s a problem because of the damage you can do by trying to make contact."

His proposed solution diverts oil with the floating weirs and then runs it through an oil-coalescing material, such as polypropylene balls, that fully extracts the oil. 

And Tim Lindsey isn’t the only one tossing oil skimming suggestions BP’s way. When he submitted his prototype to the company two weeks ago, Lindsey said his was one of 65,000 proposals already being considered.

Louisiana State University engineer Chandra Theegala also has ideas about how to de-oil the Gulf with less time and money.

“Our (patent-pending) LSU skimmer overcomes several of the existing limitations,” Theegala said.“It’s simple and has no moving parts other than a commercially available and well-proven pump, so there’s nothing to break. As it doesn’t require a centrifuge, the energy requirements are small."

In light of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, the recent flood of oil skimming innovation after two decades of relative standstill makes sense, as Theegala explains.

“The Exxon Valdez sparked new interest in skimming and related technologies in the ‘90s; however, when the interest and mechanisms for funding dry up, researchers no longer pursue it actively." Theegala explained. “Then, when we have a major oil spill like the current BP spill, we are totally unprepared.  I ‘m hoping the same story will not get repeated now.”

Although progress may seem slow, Coast Guard specialist Popovich urges the public to recognize the inherent difficulty of scooping oil slicks off the mercurial seawater surface, and BP’s oil skimmer downsizing may signal that the vessels are making a dent in cleaning up the massive spill.

“The oil that’s out there is going to continue to weather, and the skimming platforms out there … will become more efficient in recovering oil, so it’s tough to say how long it’ll take to recover,” Popovich said. “Certainly several more weeks is probably on the low end, and that’s based on whether any more oil is introduced into the environment.”

AP Photo/Pat Sullivan




Email:



07/21/2010

Another Altered BP Photo Raises Eyebrows

Bp-command-center-duo
On Monday, John Aravosis of AmericaBlog had jaws dropping across the world with his post that BP had used Photoshop to alter an image of the HIVE command center in Houston. Now Aravosis is saying one of his readers has found yet another doctored image!

To give you some context: The first command center image in question (above, top photo) showed three people sitting in front of a wall of video feeds from underwater vehicles operating near the well.

Bp-photoshop-278x165 But when enlarged and examined closeup, several editing flaws in the photo were apparent. (At right is just one example.) It became obvious that someone had cut images of video feeds from another time and pasted them into the otherwise blank screens on the wall.

Other questions were raised as well, such as the fact that the meta data for the image says it was created in March of 2001. On commenter on the AmericaBlog pointed out that the meta data also shows that the camera used was a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III, which was released in 2007. So it's possible that the date was never correctly set in the camera. Additionally, dates on at least two of the video feeds show that they are from July 16, 2010.

Yesterday, the Washington Post ran a story addressing the alteration. Steven Mufson writes that

"Scott Dean, a spokesman for BP, said that there was nothing sinister in the photo alteration and provided the original unaltered version. He said that a photographer working for the company had inserted the three images in spots where the video screens were blank." 

Bp-fake-top-kill-278x165 In response to all of the hullabaloo, BP released the original, undoctored image (above, bottom photo). I put them one on top of the other, so that you could compare the differences.

But now, there's another photo being called into question -- this one from a top kill exercise that took place several weeks ago. The image shows several people sitting around a table with a screen in the background (right). But a closeup image (bottom right) indicates that the image on the screen may have been added. Jagged lines around the heads of the two gentlemen sitting in front of the screen hint at a bad cut and paste job.

Bp-fake-top-kill-closeup-165x165 Aravosis asks, "How many other crisis response photos from BP have been faked? Did they fake any videos?"

This information is disheartening to say the least. Certainly it makes people wonder what else BP may be doing in order to gloss up its image. And obviously these images do little to support BP's claim of transparency.

On a lighter note, @BPGlobalPR, a satirical twitter not run by the company, says:

Hey BP fans! Photoshop our command center and win prizes!* (*there are no prizes) http://ow.ly/2edfr - Use #BPphotoshop


06/28/2010

Oil Clean Up Tech Needs More Funding

Oil-boom-650x400
Last week, Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), introduced a bill that would "provide for the establishment of a program to support the development, demonstration, and commercialization of innovative technologies to prevent, stop, or capture large-scale accidental discharges of oil or other hydrocarbons from offshore oil and gas drilling operations, including deepwater and ultra-deepwater operations, and for other purposes."

The so-called SOS Act (download a PDF here) would not increase costs to taxpayers, but redirect $50 million a year to clean up R&D from monies acquired through oil and gas royalty payments normally used to subsidize development of deepwater drilling.

WIDE ANGLE: Get all the latest news and information about the massive oil spill threatening wetlands and wildlife on the Gulf Coast.

Fifty million dollars a year sounds like chump change compared to the $33.8 billion Shell Oil, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Chevron Corp. and BP America spent in the last three years looking for new oil and gas, according to this article from the Associated Press.

But it also sounds like a good start when compared with the cost of cleanup, using technology that hasn't changed much at all since the 70s. Check out these numbers from Fortune:

  • 1978 Amoco Cadiz: $85.2 million ($3.5 billion inflation-adjusted)
  • 1979 PEMEX Ixtoc: $42 million ($1.3 billion inflation-adjusted)
  • 1989 Exxon Valdez: $3.5 billion ($6.3 billion inflation-adjusted)
  • 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon: $2.35 billion (estimated to run upwards of $10 billion)


In the meantime, BP has spent about $1 million a month on an integrated search marketing campaign using Google AdWords and YouTube.That's just a little under half of what the SOS Act is looking for in total for the year. Brother, can you spare a dime?

Photo: iStockphoto




Email:



06/22/2010

Oil Spill Superimposed on Your City

Oil-spill-boston-650x450
Since the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster erupted back in April, many of us have sat helpless, watching the crude ooze its slow-motion destruction across the Gulf waters and coastline. We may have seen the satellite images put out by NASA showing how the spill is progressing and heard countless times about how much money BP is forking over for recovery. And we've read many reports about how the oil is killing wildlife, threatening the fishing industry and ruining cultural cuisine

But for those of us who do not live in the Gulf area, the implications of such a disaster are still many hundreds or even thousands of miles away. 

Well, thanks to the Internet, Google Maps and 29-year-old software developer, Andy Lintner of Royal Oak, Mich., we can have a touch of reality.

Lintner created ifitwasmyhome.com, a website that allows you to get an up-to-date graphic of the oil spill laid over a map of your region. The point is not to show how the spill might look in your area had the rig exploded there (oil moves differently over land than water), but to show the size of the oil spill relative to your area, to give you a better sense of its scale. Above is how the size of the spill compares to my region of Boston, Mass.

WIDE ANGLE: Get all the latest news and information about the massive oil spill threatening wetlands and wildlife on the Gulf Coast.

I called Lintner to ask him why he developed the site. He said that a couple of weeks ago, he and his wife, Kristen had seen a graphic of the spill overlaid onto New York City. But that didn't mean much to them since they weren't from New York. So he tinkered around with Google Maps and spill data from NOAA that gives the latitude and longitude points for the slick's area to overlay it onto Royal Oak.

That made an impact.

"I spent the rest of that night throwing the website together," he said.

The result is a simple, but effective site where all you need to do is enter your city's name, state and country to see how the spill size compares to your region.

"I shared it on Facebook, and it spread from there," said Lintner. "I’ve had more than 3 million visitors."

Lintner thinks his site has been effective because in general, people have had a hard time grasping the size of the spill.

"People who live outside those areas aren’t used to thinking about the scale of the coast," he said.

Once on the site, viewers learn a little bit about the spill and are also directed to other resources to talk, think, volunteer, or donate money for coastal relief.

Lintner has to update the site with new data from NOAA everyday. But he's committed to doing it.

"I’ll keep it up as long as the spill is going. It’s a decent amount of work, but it’s worth the investment of time," he said.

"I feel like it’s helping to increase the perception of the spill."




Email:



06/21/2010

Super Material Soaks Up Crude Oil

Dr._Smith_Alabama_Crude_Oil

Finally, a glimmer of hope: A unique material created by a professor at Texas Tech University is proving that it can successfully trap crude oil and absorb the toxic vapors that the oil gives off.

The material, called Fibertect, was developed by Seshadri Ramkumar, an associate professor of nonwoven technologies at the university's Institute of Environment and Human Health. Top and bottom layers are made from raw cotton to absorb the oil and the center consists of a fibrous activated carbon where the oil gets contained, according to a description from the university. The material, which is biodegradable on its own, can absorb up to 15 times its weight.

Oil_Soaked Initially Fibertect was intended to be used by the U.S. military in case of a chemical or biological attack because it can even effectively trap agents such as mustard gas. In late May, the EPA approved Fibertect for use cleaning up dangerous materials. Since then its distributor, First Line Technology, has put it to the test on the front lines of the mind-bogglingly bad oil spill in the Gulf that started two months ago.

Grand Isle, Louisiana, has been so hard hit by the spill that local fisherman Doug Shaw recently described the area as "dead" to a New York Daily News reporter. In other words, it's the right place to try out the material. Preliminary tests in Grand Isle demonstrated that Fibertect could handle an oily mess. When the material was put on top of an oil glob that had washed ashore, Fibertect picked it up and wouldn't release it.

One of the key differences between this material and the more common absorption materials being employed to mop up oil is that it's made from organic components instead of polypropylene, which is derived from petroleum. Granted there are large leaps being made with recycling bottles into polypro, but the less processing involved in having to manufacture cleanup tools, the better. Another advantage is that these super cotton pads can handle toxic gases, which helps protect cleanup crews who already have a host of horrors to face.

I just wish that Texas Tech University's professors could figure out a way to construct enormous, record-breaking rafts wrapped in Fibertect-like material that we could use to speed the cleanup. By one academic estimate, oil from the spill is already enough to power at least 38,000 cars for an entire year, and that's a low estimate. We're going to need all the wipes they can make.

Photo: TTU associate professor of toxicology Ernest Smith uses Fibertect on crude oil found near Orange Beach, Alabama, following the spill in the Gulf of Mexico (top). An oil-soaked Fibertect (bottom). Credit: First Line Technology.




Email:



Categories

My Other Accounts

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2005