Marsgate, Revisited
A few days have passed since the buzz about what is or isn’t on Mars and NASA’s handling of the matter so it seemed reasonable to have a think for a bit about what happened.
First and foremost, it’s striking that so many people apparently care whether there is or isn’t life on Mars, though why knowing whether some bit of bacteria absorbed energy, made microbial pee and/or poo and spun off 2.5 microbial kids is a bit hard to explain in this age of opposite-speak and skepticism.
Second, to the extent that my personal and professional integrity extends, I can state that there was no government cover-up about what information to release and when to release it, so if you’re totally into conspiracy theories, you can stop reading here.
Third (and if you’re into conspiracy theories you might enjoy this), the buzz that initially cast NASA as the villain for hiding information, not only allowed the government to step into a role most beloved by Americans -- the vindicated -- but also exit the drama with heightened awareness, even accolades, for its work. For anyone missing this subtlety, NASA spelled it out for us: “Phoenix Mars Team Opens Window on Scientific Process,” was the headline on the agency’s Aug. 5 press release laying the matter to rest. In addition to world-wide media coverage, the clan following the mission on the Twitter text-messaging network grew by more than 300 members.
Finally, will it happen again? Indubitably. That is the price we pay for our Freedom of Speech. It can make for an uncomfortable moment or two, but when it’s lacking, guess who is the first to take note?
-- President George W. Bush
Aug. 8, 2008
at the dedicated of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, China


Recent Comments