A view from Phoenix
Irene Klotz Discovery News space correspondent Irene Klotz chronicles humanity's efforts to leave the planet. One day, she wants to see for herself what all the fuss is about.
First color pix?
Posted by: Arash | May 26, 2008 at 01:52 AM
Dang. Pretty awesome camera this stations got one it. B & W, Color... wonder if they can switch it on over to antique and negative capture mode too. But hey, 420 million dollars of our taxpayers dollars for this mission... better have a good camera to get some good beauty shots of E.T
Posted by: Nero | May 26, 2008 at 02:09 AM
Arash,
Why comment or for that matter even visit this site if you do not agree with NASA programs?
CONGRATS, NASA!
Posted by: Logicskier | May 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM
It makes me feel good to know we've got just what it takes to make such a complex mission work. Keep up the good work, NASA. Now as long as we can get a viable alternative to the space shuttle constructed safely and on time / budget, I see no reason why we couldn't logically return to the moon in the next 30 years or so.
Posted by: Steve | May 26, 2008 at 10:46 AM
Fantastic !! Already this is shaping up to be one of the best missions ever flown. Tremendous success right from the get-go. With so much negative bull going on these days, this is a ray of hope and wonder. Yea NASA !!!!
Posted by: Richard | May 26, 2008 at 10:47 AM
The real images of mars.
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/5831/mars1cm8.jpg
;)
Posted by: pinger | May 26, 2008 at 11:14 AM
this is so awsome, i am glad we can get such nice pics of mars and hopefully i will see another man moon landing in my lifetime, nasa rocks
Posted by: Aleks | May 26, 2008 at 12:47 PM
This is just so amazing. It's so cool that you look at those rocks and think... that looks like our planet, but it comes from somewhere millions of miles away that no one has ever stepped foot on.
Mind-blowing.
Posted by: Jess | May 26, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Aleks - I couldn't agree more
Posted by: James | May 26, 2008 at 01:44 PM
it looks a little green on the second pic why not on the first are my eyes decieving me on the second more colorfull picture. is that greenage or something else
Posted by: chris | May 26, 2008 at 01:59 PM
NASA spent 240 million on this mission to see if this spot was capable of supporting life. But it has no way to detect life, either present or past. Wazzup with that??
Posted by: Cancerman | May 26, 2008 at 03:11 PM
i bet its another scam like with neil armstrong. pff nasa probably has some fools in a basement full of sand taking pictures and saying its mars. first man on the moon?My foot becouse saying my a.s..s is blocked. fist photos of mars. my foot again. this is scam i tell you
Posted by: thetruth | May 26, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Actually Phoenix can detect organic molecules in water ice so does have life-detection data capability.
Posted by: seacraft | May 26, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Mars isn't as red as NASA portrays it. Mars does have blue skies and brighter blue rocks. :) There are dust storms that cause the reddish colors at times. And there is water/ice on mars holding organisms and possibly more. There are some things they don't tell you because they don't think the "people" are ready.
Posted by: Syn | May 26, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Mars isn't as red as NASA portrays it. Mars does have blue skies and brighter blue rocks. :) There are dust storms that cause the reddish colors at times. And there is water/ice on mars holding organisms and possibly more. There are some things they don't tell you because they don't think the "people" are ready.
Posted by: Syn | May 26, 2008 at 04:44 PM
So you steal two pics from NASA's or JPL's site, slap em on your blog, don't bother to name the source(s) or to add any additional useful comment and that's it? Pretty pathetic I'd say.
Posted by: me | May 26, 2008 at 05:48 PM
Attn: "me" (not me)
They do not have to do the sources. even on the NASA site it says these pictures are not copyrighted. therefore there is no need to source them.
BTW nice pictures so far
Posted by: Mark | May 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I'm all about scientific progress but 240 mil could be spent in better ways. What do these pics show us that the other rovers haven't?
Posted by: Danny | May 28, 2008 at 07:15 PM
Well Danny, these photos are different from others because they are taken on a part of the planet we've never landed at before, specifically the northern polar region. Also, the Phoenix is not a "rover", it's a lander, it doesn't move once on the surface. As for the cost, it's about a $1.35 per citizen, surely you can afford that without all the whining.
Posted by: Old Bob | June 01, 2008 at 12:22 PM
After jettisoning the parachute so close to the landing I wonder why its not seen in any of the photographs, or did it drift too far out of the field of view. Just wondering why it hasn't been seen.
Posted by: Louis Lux | June 01, 2008 at 07:53 PM
The bottom pictures are in 3D. To see this in 3D you need to have Red/Green glasses. Or you can just get the Red and Green gels and make your own.
Posted by: Bangkok-Bob | June 24, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Many people online ask about omega watches quality and price
? I can tell you ,i have a omega watches is very good and
beautiful and the peice is not expensive .
http://www.omegawatchessale.com
Posted by: omega watches | June 26, 2009 at 04:19 AM