Why sending a message to aliens is easier than sending a message to future humans
November 25, 2009
By John Pavlus
Why sending a message to aliens is easier than sending a message to future humans
Nothing like Thanksgiving family gatherings to remind us all of the generation gap. Sometimes it seems like it'd be easier to get a message across to extraterrestrials than to communicate clearly with someone twenty years older or younger than you.
Well it's not all in your head. According to these articles in Wired and Slate, it literally IS easier to send comprehensible messages to aliens than to future generations of humans.
We've been beaming electronic messages-in-bottles out into space since the 1970s, but according to scientists at CalTech and Stanford, few if any of these messages were tested to see if they could be easily decoded. So they took it upon themselves to devise a new code so simple and easy that a handful of college students cracked it in less than an hour. (The message contained basic stuff that any sufficiently advanced civilization should recognize, like arithmetical expressions and atomic mass ratios.)
In contrast, our own Department of Energy has been laboring for almost twenty years to craft an intelligible message that our fellow humans might decipher tens of thousands of years from now. The goal is to prevent future civilizations from accidentally uncovering dangerous nuclear waste buried in Yucca Mountain, NV and other sites--and the message is as simple as it gets: "KEEP OUT!"
What's so hard about that? Well, you can't use any known language, since even a thousand years from now it's unlikely than anyone will be able to read it. And even if they could, who's to say they'd take the warning seriously? (British archaeologists didn't exactly turn on their heels when they read King Tut's sternly worded hieroglyphics cursing anyone who dared set foot in his tomb.)
The DoE's solution sounds more like an Andy Goldsworthy art project crossed with a haunted house. Giant, menacing earthworks, like a landscape full of massive black thorns or obelisks showing faces screaming in terror, would supposedly get the idea across that the land above the waste dump is best left uninhabited.
But humans are eternally curious--especially about mysterious, ominous stuff like obelisk fields (hello, Stonehenge?)--so no one can say whether that approach would do any good. In fact, the best policy might just be leaving no markers at all -- hiding the nuclear waste in plain sight, rather than calling attention to it.
Or maybe it'd just be easier to send the message to aliens, and let THEM find a clever way to warn our 300th-century descendants about the dangers of nuclear waste...?
































Recent Comments