Cloud Computing With Google Chrome?

Hurricane … er, tropical storm Hanna probably was a bit of a disappointment to those of you who are extreme weather junkies, but storm-force winds or no, the brief downpour that we had in the Washington, D.C., area managed to knock out my little corner of the electrical grid. So I’m been compelled to camp out in the coffee shop of a nearby Borders bookstore and contend for one of the precious few three-prong outlets that are available for recharging the laptops and cell phones of the uprooted, information-starved horde. But enough of one man’s lament. Let’s turn instead to a more universal — or nearly so — problem: Microsoft Windows.

Believe it or not, there is a logical thread here, because Windows has a lot in common with the weather. Like the latter, everybody complains about the most kludgy, temperamental and ubiquitous of operating systems, while knowing full well that there’s nothing we can do about it. As I’ve written about previously, those woes have been exacerbated by the coming of the dreaded Windows Vista, with its annoying habit of continually asking permission to perform functions, its demands that we download new drivers for peripherals, and its capricious-at-best compatibility with software that doesn’t have “Microsoft” on the label. OK, so we could join the fringe that has defected to the Mac OS, but that would mean overcoming our aversion to expensive, unnaturally white computers, buying all new software and possibly even getting WWSJD (“What Would Steve Jobs Do?”) vanity license plates.

But now, there’s another possibility, a tantalizing vision of a future in which Windows — or the Mac OS — might no longer matter. A world in which we not only won’t have to worry about whether our software is compatible with our OS, but in which we won’t ever have to install any software again, period. A world in which we’ll be able to do just about everything we need, from updating a spreadsheet to editing digital photos, inside the borders of a platform-agnostic browser. I’m talking about cloud computing, in which software will actually run on distant Internet servers, rather than our PCs.

A harbinger: The big player in cloud computing is Google, the online search, advertising, email, mapping and video behemoth, whose cumulative dominance of the Internet rivals Microsoft’s dominance in operating systems and applications software. In 2006, Google introduced Google Apps, a service that offers a Web-based word processor, a spreadsheet program and other applications meant to challenge Microsoft Office. To go with them, it recently unveiled Google Chrome, an open-source alternative to Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser. As InformationWeek writer Mitch Wagner explains:

Google wanted to build a new browser from scratch, designed specifically to be used with the new generation of Web applications. Many of those applications are, of course, Google's own: Gmail, Google Docs, Google Reader, and more. Google designed the browser to be lightweight, fast, have a minimalist user interface, and to resist crashing under the heavy JavaScript demands of Web applications.

As PC World reviewer Nick Mediati notes:

Chrome's design bridges the gap between desktop and so-called "cloud computing." At the touch of a button, Chrome lets you make a desktop, Start menu, or QuickLaunch shortcut to any Web page or Web application, blurring the line between what's online and what's inside your PC. For example, I created a desktop shortcut for Google Maps. When you create a shortcut for a Web application, Chrome strips away all of the toolbars and tabs from the window, leaving you with something that feels much more like a desktop application than like a Web application or page.

One doesn’t have to consult www.nostradamusonline.com to see where this all could well lead. The beta release of Chrome, oddly, is only Windows-compatible; a Mac OS version reportedly is in the works — as is, more significantly, a version of Chrome for the free, open-source Linux OS.  Envision a future in which your basic PC costs about as much as a bottle of Jägermeister and is even easier to use, a world in which you’ll never have to hear these sounds ever again.

But there’s a potential downside, as usual. If we all eventually tell Microsoft to stick it and turn to the Internet and Google as our operating system and our apps, are we only getting ourselves into the sort of situation that Pete Townsend might describe as “here’s to the new boss/same as the old boss”? It would make Google the most powerful company on Earth (if it isn’t already). A lot of critics already are worrying about Google’s ability to track and analyze what you do on the Web, and the uses to which it might put that information. (Here’s a 2007 study by the watchdog group Privacy International that is decidedly uncomplimentary.) And they were even less thrilled with the wording of Chrome’s end-user agreement, which, as Computerworld notes, originally contained

"a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through" the new browser.

Google subsequently deleted that clause, but you’ve got to wonder what they had in mind when they put it in.

So, what do you think? Is Web-based cloud computing the wave of the future, or should we stick to the devil we know? Express your opinion below.

Photo: iStock 1

Comments

[surya narayan]

my thoughts on google chrome
http://snsays.com/260/google-chrome/

[Meldrick]

I read surya's blog and I still don't know whether he likes Chrome or not. All he does is explain that it has a task manager like Windows.

Personally, cloud computing sounds like a good idea to me. I hate having to spend $150 for Microsoft Office.

[Manny Ramirez]

One problem with this scenario is that Google's apps lack all the sophisticated features of Microsoft Office. You can't embed footnotes in a Google Docs document, for example, or do a word count. And you only have a few typefaces to choose from. I wonder if Google will ever offer these sorts of features?

Another thing to remember is that if you're relying on applications running on remote servers, you're depending on those servers not to go down at a crucial moment. I know that Google has an enormous infrastructure and they probably have lots of redundancy built into the system, but still.

[steve]

Programs controlled by a faceless remote entity is an extremly bad idea.

[Brad Walters]

I'd rather see people run Linux and use an open-source alternative to Office.

[Paul Stamatiou]

You linked to me about an old Vista post but here's a far more relevant post of mine, entitled How To Live the Cloud Life:
http://paulstamatiou.com/2008/08/21/how-to-live-the-cloud-life

[Eddie Chung]

Any solution that gets Windows out of my life is a good one.

[Caffeine Driven Stress Magnet]

Microsoft Windows has become increasingly glitch-filled, but I'm still worried about shifting over to a world ruled by Google. If they get too powerful, they;ll become just as bad as Microsoft (if they aren't already). I think we'd be better off with a world where there are two or three viable alternatives to Windows. That would keep everybody honest and focused on best serving the consumer (i.e. all of us).

[Bill Gates]

I just love Google Chrome! But I'm only saying that because they have incriminating pictures of me.

[Jerry Seinfeld]

Yeah, I know how that is. That's why I'm doing those Microsoft commercials.

[Mothra]

Anything would be better than Vista!

[Dr. Duh]

just use linux its free and there are free office suites and other software its easy to use just like microsoft just as powerful and infact safer and best of all like i said its free