our networks
discovery channeltlcanimal planetscience channelmilitary channeldiscovery fit and health
shop now

Weblogs

Pat LaLama Reports: DNA Matches Detective Lazarus

February 10, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Follow Pat's daily coverage of the Stephanie Lazarus Trial.    Read her Bio >> ]

 

Read Pat LaLama's Past Reports On This Case

 

>>Day 5 of The Stephanie Lazarus Murder Trial<<


01-stephanie-lazarus-300x250Imagine these statistics. One in every 402 quadrillion. Yes, quadrillion. From the witness stand today in the murder trial of former LAPD detective Stephanie Lazarus, that statistic caught the attention of the jury who spent the day listening to complicated DNA related testimony. But that single statistic was clear as day.

It comes down to this…a DNA analyst, testifying for the prosecution,  compared samples taken from a bite mark on the arm of victim Sherri Rasmussen in 1986, with DNA taken directly from defendant Lazarus’ inside cheek in 2009. LAPD criminalist Jennifer Francis said there was a match. And here comes that potentially damning statistic; according to Francis, there is only a one in 402 quadrillion chance the DNA could belong to a person other than Lazarus!

“On earth would you expect to find another individual with the profiles of Stephanie Lazarus and item #30? (the bite mark sample), asked Deputy District Attorney Paul Nunez.“No”, answered Francis. But outside court, defense attorney Mark Overland told Investigation Discovery that he refused to put much stock in that dramatic statistic.

“The results depend in part on the subjective opinion of the analyst. Their statistical probability is based on a data base where the FBI has analyzed only a few hundred people. We all know the smaller the data base, the less accurate the statistical probability,” he said.

In other testimony, another LAPD criminalist, Michael Mastrocovo told the jury that when he compared the bite mark DNA to another sample taken from a white soda cup used by Lazarus and discarded, there was a suitable enough match to arrest Stephanie Lazarus. 

“DNA has taken on almost universal acceptance by the public”, says veteran Los Angeles defense attorney Bob Schwartz. (He’s not associated with the Lazarus case.) “Generally a jury will accept DNA evidence. The defense must prove in this particular case, that there’s something wrong or improper about the collection, storage and analysis of the DNA. He can’t succeed by attacking the science.”
Overland has already suggested to the court that the bite mark sample was damaged by mishandling on the part of law enforcement or crime lab staff.

 

 Discuss This Case With Other ID Addicts

 

Related Links:
Test Your Knowledge On How DNA Works

Video: Inside the CSI DNA Lab

 

Photo Credit: Former Los Angeles Police Officer Stephanie Lazarus with her attorney Mark Overland at Los Angeles Superior hearing Wednesday, July 29, (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

Pat LaLama Reports: DNA From LAPD's Elite Takes Center Stage

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Follow Pat's daily coverage of the Stephanie Lazarus Trial.    Read her Bio >> ]

 

 Read Pat LaLama's Past Reports On This Case

 

 

>>Day 4 of The Stephanie Lazarus Murder Trial<<

 

 

Stephanie lazarus

Imagine you are a member of the LAPD’s elite Internal Surveillance Unit, and your job is to tail one of your own.

Such was the case for Detectives Roberto Morales, Dante Palacio and Sgt. Jim Hensley. Back in 2009, the three men followed then LAPD Detective Stephanie Lazarus to a Costco store in Los Angeles. They had one mission….to discreetly snatch a sample of Lazarus’ DNA.

Lazarus didn’t know it, but she was a suspect in a brutal murder case that happened in 1986. At the time, the murder of 29 year old Sherri Rasmussen was determined to be the end result of a burglary gone wrong, perpetrated by two male suspects. But saliva from a bite mark on the victim’s left arm, along with other evidence, was lifted and preserved in the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office.


In 2005, cold case detectives took a new look at the case and the bite mark evidence. Using new DNA technology, it was ultimately determined that the saliva belonged to a woman.  As investigators dug deeper, they determined Lazarus, a highly respected detective, was now a viable suspect. But they needed a sample of her DNA to try and match to the bite mark.

On the witness stand today in The People vs. Stephanie Lazarus, Morales, Palacio and Hensley described the undercover detail they executed on May 28th 2009, to obtain the necessary DNA.


“She was getting something to eat. There was a food court outside,” said Morales. “She had a white cup. She was drinking out of it.” Morales testified that he watched Lazarus for five to seven minutes before Lazarus stood up. Morales said he was surprised when Lazarus began walking toward him, but she discarded the cup in the trash can just three to four feet from Morales then walked toward the entrance to the Costco.

Morales went to the trash can and recovered two similar cups that were lying on top of the garbage. He picked up both cups which still had lids and straws attached.

Morales then met up with Palacio who placed the cups in an envelope. The envelope was then given to Hensley, who delivered the evidence to the LAPD crime lab.


On cross examination, defense attorney Mark Overland asked Morales if Lazarus was alone. “She was not alone. She was with a little kid,” said Morales.  Morales testified that when Lazarus got up she had two cups in her hand. She discarded one and took the other with her.

Prosecutors told the jury in opening statements that DNA on the bite mark indisputably matches DNA evidence obtained from the white cup.

Except there’s a problem…….at least according to the defense.

The bite mark evidence had been stored in a freezer in the custody of the Los Angeles Coroner’s office since 1986. When property custodians went to look for the evidence in 2004, at the request of the LAPD, the envelope containing the tube that held the swab was in bad shape. “The envelope looked tainted. It was pretty ratty looking,” said Supervising Criminalist Dan Anderson of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office. The envelope had a big hole toward the top, exposing the screw-on-cap on top of the tube.


Anderson testified that the envelope was “so destroyed with a hole on top” that the tube containing the physical evidence could have fallen out.
Anderson placed the torn envelope with the tube inside, into a bigger envelope and secured it.  But Anderson testified that the tube containing the evidence had not been compromised in any way. “Nothing happened to the tube itself”, he told the court.


On cross examination, Overland said the cap could have been unscrewed. “The envelope is supposed to be secured to protect the evidence that’s inside of it”, said Overland.  Overland is trying to show that the chain of custody makes the DNA comparison unreliable.

 

 Discuss This Case With Other ID Addicts

 

 

Photo Credit: AP Photos

Pat LaLama Reports: Resting On A Bite Mark

February 08, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Follow Pat's daily coverage of the Stephanie Lazarus Trial.    Read her Bio >> ]

 Read Pat LaLama's Past Reports On This Case

 

>>Day 3 of The Stephanie Lazarus Murder Trial<<



02-stephanie-lazarus-300x250

Former LAPD detective turned accused killer, Stephanie Lazarus, never looks up from the counsel table in the Los Angeles courtroom where she is being tried for the murder of Sherri Rasmussen 26 years ago. The defendant keeps head down and pen in hand— making constant notations, reviewing documents and evaluating the photographic evidence that is shown on a laptop computer on the table—almost as if this once respected cop was investigating her own murder case. I’ve never seen her make eye contact with the jury…not even when her defense attorney Mark Overland is addressing the court.

The only real glimpse one gets of Stephanie Lazarus comes when she is being brought into the courtroom from the lockup where she is held until proceedings begin each day. When she entered on Wednesday morning, Lazarus smiled warmly at her husband, LAPD detective Scott Young who is seated in the right front row of the courtroom, clutching a bible.  Young seems loyal to a fault

Equally loyal is the victim’s family, parents Nels and Loretta Rasmussen, and sister Teresa Lane. They’re seated in the middle of the courtroom.  As a matter of courtesy today, they were forewarned by prosecutors that upcoming autopsy photos could be quite devastating. The Rasmussen family had the option to leave the courtroom. They stayed.

Then came the compelling testimony of Dr. Susan Selser of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office.  “This individual suffered many injuries”, said Deputy District Attorney Paul Nunez.

 That would be an understatement.

Through graphic pictures and the testimony of Dr. Selser, who performed the autopsy on Rasmussen’s body, the prosecution laid out the details of a horrific murder. They insist the murder was motivated by Lazarus’ jealousy and revenge---NOT by a burglary gone wrong as the LAPD had concluded more than  two and half decades ago.

A large screen depicted a graphic, close up shot of Rasmussen’s chest with three bullet holes. Each one of them fatal, according to Dr. Selser. The bullets penetrated the heart, lungs and spinal cord. All of them were fired at close range. One of the gunshot wounds was particularly disturbing. Dr. Selser testified that black soot and abrasions around the outside of the wound were consistent with a “contact gunshot “. That means the muzzle of the weapon was placed right up against the body—then fired. In this case, right in the middle of the chest.

According to testimony, Sherri Rasmussen had at least 50 other wounds on her body, including contusions, abrasions and lacerations. Her hands, face and skull were riddled with wounds. Dr. Selser testified that Rasmussen suffered blunt force trauma. One wonders if the athletic Rasmussen, who stood 6’ tall and weighed 150 pounds, tried desperately to fight off her attacker.

Dr. Selser testified that wounds on Rasmussen’s wrists were consistent with those caused by a rope or cord. Prosecutors contend Rasmussen may have been tied up by her assailant.

But the prosecution’s most damning evidence may be that of a particular injury pattern found on Rasmussen’s left arm. Dr. Selser identified the wound as being consistent with a bite mark. It was a brutal one--- characterized by bruising and abrasion caused by hemorrhaging of tissue.  Dr. Selser testified that the bite mark occurred at the time of death.

Prosecutors are resting a big part of their case on that bite mark, which didn’t undergo DNA testing until nearly two decades after the murder, when the case was reopened. Prosecutors believe without a doubt, the bite mark belongs to Lazarus. The defense will try to prove that the integrity of the physical evidence was compromised while in the chain of custody.

 

 Share Your Thoughts About This Case On Our Facebook Page

 

 

 

 

Photo Credit - Former Los Angeles Police Officer Stephanie Lazarus with her attorney Mark Overland at Los Angeles Superior hearing Wednesday, July 29, (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pat LaLama Reports: A Portrait Of Jealousy, Rage and Revenge

February 07, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Follow Pat's daily coverage of the Stephanie Lazarus Trial.    Read her Bio >> ]

 

 Read Pat LaLama's Past Reports On This Case

 

>>Day 2 of The Stephanie Lazarus Murder Trial<<


stephanie lazarusWatching bloody crime scene photos never gets any easier. Images of 29 year old Sherri Rasmussen’s beaten body, gunned down in the living room of her Los Angeles townhome flashed across a giant courtroom screen…three bullet holes in her chest…her statuesque frame lying lifeless on the ground. Her arms were positioned upward as if she were desperately trying to ward off a spray of bullets. I can see the anguish on Nels and Loretta Rasmussen’s faces. They are seated just inches away in the row behind me. Losing their daughter back in 1986, at the hands of a vicious murderer, seems to hurt as much today as ever.

 

On Tuesday, the prosecution in the murder trial of former LAPD detective Stehpanie Lazarus used crime scene photographs to try and paint a murderous portrait of jealousy, rage and revenge. The key motivation behind Lazarus’ ruthless vendetta, they say.

Prosecutors contend that while Lazarus was a young patrol officer 26 years ago, she murdered Rasmussen, the new bride of Lazarus’ ex-boyfriend, John Ruetten. Back then homicide investigators concluded the murder was the result of a botched burglary attempt. They based their decision on among other things, stereo equipment left at the bottom of a staircase and the drawer of a living room table that had been flung open. Other robberies in the same neighborhood solidified the burglary theory. Cops believed the suspects were two males.

Prosecutors on Tuesday, through a series of photographs tried to paint an entirely different picture. One of personal revenge. A photograph depicted speaker wires and a white blood stained rope that prosecutors believe Lazarus used to tie up Rasmussen. Another shows broken fingernails lying on the ground near the front door. Shelves on an entertainment center were collapsed. A lamp was knocked over. A ceramic vase crashed on the floor. It was a violent struggle. Prosecutors believe Sherri Rasmussen, who stood 5’10” tried desperately to defend herself from Lazarus whom she knew. Family members contend that Lazarus had harassed Rasmussen on many occasions while she was still alive.

The next photograph showed evidence that was essentially ignored by the lead detective in the case back in 1986.  It was a distinct bite mark on Sherri’s left inner forearm. A swab of saliva was taken and the evidence was stored away in the Coroner’s office.

Back then a second detective on the case opined that a bite mark is more symbolic of the work of a female accomplice. The lead detective dismissed the theory, insisting it was a burglary. (The jury hasn’t yet heard this part.) Twenty years after the fact new DNA analysis revealed the bite bark was in fact that of a woman. Prosecutors told the jury there is a 1 in 1.7 sextillion chance that the DNA belongs to someone besides Lazarus. “That’s 17 followed by 20 zeros”, says Prosecutor Shannon Presby.

Lazarus defense attorney Mark Overland is trying to prove that faulty memories on the part of witnesses, shoddy police work and compromised physical evidence will create all the reasonable doubt a jury needs.

 

 Share Your Thoughts About This Case On Our Facebook Page

 

 

Photo Credit: Former Los Angeles Police Officer Stephanie Lazarus with her attorney Mark Overland at Los Angeles Superior hearing Wednesday, July 29, (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

The Powell Family Tragedy: Will There Ever Be Answers?

[ By Dr. Kenneth J. Ryan, a criminologist at California State University. Here's his take on the recent horrific crime making headline news this week. Read his Bio >>


Id-blog-powel-explosion-020612A little past noon on Sunday, February 5, 2012, Joshua Powell murdered his children, Braden, 5, and Charlie, 7,and took his own life in a deliberately set gas explosion.  According to the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office, the explosion that destroyed Powell’s Puyallup, Washington home was the result of a murder-suicide.  Moments before the explosion took the lives of Powell and his children he sent emails to his attorney, family and friends saying, “I’m sorry, goodbye.”  In voicemails left to relatives Powell said, I am not able to live without my sons.”

Autopsy results of the children later revealed that they perished of smoke inhalation; however, both boys had been attacked with a hatchet.  Charles suffered a hatchet wound to the neck and younger brother Braden had been struck in the neck and head by Powell.  According to autopsies, hatchet wounds were not the cause of death of either child.  It is speculated by authorities that after failing to kill the children with his hatchet, Powell ignited a five gallon can of gasoline at their feet and the explosion that followed caused their deaths.

 

Id-blog-josh-powell-020612Powell lost custody of his children following the disappearance of his wife Susan in December 2009 when the investigation led to the discovery of child pornography in the family home.  Powell’s father Steven was charged in the crime and was in custody at the time of the blast.

A custody battle raged between Powell and his missing wife’s parents Charles and Judith Cox who were given custody of the children following the grandfather’s arrest.  A petition to regain custody filed in a Washington State Superior Court was dismissed and Powell was ordered to be examined for psycho-sexual disorders. 

Early Sunday afternoon a contract worker for the state delivered the two little boys to the Powell home for a scheduled, supervised visit.  Apparently the children ran ahead of the case worker and Powell, who had been waiting outside, brought the boys into the house and locked the door behind them.  The case worker knocked on the door and smelled gas, but Powell never answered.  Apparently Powell attacked the children with his hatchet as soon as they entered the residence.  As the case worker was notifying her supervisor that Powell was alone with the children, the house exploded in a fireball, killing everyone inside.  The bodies of the children were found in a central room with their father.

 

Id-blog-susan-powell-020612According to CBS News, the children recently had begun to relate additional details regarding the disappearance of their mother Susan, 28.  Powell always maintained that his wife had walked away from the marriage when he and the children went on an impromptu camping excursion on a snowy, frozen Utah night in late 2009.  However, in published reports the boys told investigators that on the night of their mother’s disappearance, she had accompanied them “in the trunk” and later she walked into the desert with Powell.  When he returned alone, he is alleged to have told the children that “mommy got lost.”

With these revelations and presuming their veracity, it is easy to speculate that the single-most important witnesses in the disappearance of Susan Powell have been silenced.  The murders of these children are inexplicable, except that perhaps their father did not want them to testify against him in a criminal court.  Consider that Powell has been described as a narcissist and recently had been ordered to undergo a court-ordered psycho-sexual evaluation.  Given the recent revelations of the children, Powell surely was threatened with being charged as a murder suspect.  He may have seen no other way out than to murder the children and himself.  The witnesses against him are now forever silenced and he will never be tried for killing his wife as the children’s statements clearly infer.

West Valley, Utah police have issued a statement that they are not yet sure how these developments will impact the investigation into the disappearance of Susan Powell.  Josh Powell had always been a point of interest in the disappearance of his wife and all roads lead directly to him, according to investigators.  And now, but to find Susan Powell, there is little left to do but bury the children.

 

 Share Your Thoughts About This Case On Our Facebook Page

 

 

 

Powell explosion credit:
Pierce County Sheriff's deputies and Graham Firefighters work around the smoldering remains of a house near Fredrickson, Wash., Sunday, Feb. 5, 2012, where, according to a sheriff's spokesman, three bodies were were found. The bodies are believed to be Josh Powell and his two sons. The explosion occurred moments after a Child Protective Services worker brought the two boys to the home for a supervised visit. (AP Photo/John Froschauer)

Susan Powell credit:
A flier seeking information on the whereabouts of Susan Powell, who was reported missing Dec. 7, 2009, in Utah, is shown, Thursday, Dec. 17, 2009, at a press conference in Puyallup, Wash. Powell's family said Thursday they are saddened but not surprised that her husband Josh Powell has been named a person of interest in the investigation. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

Josh Powell credit:
In this Aug. 23, 2011 file photo, Josh Powell, husband of missing Utah woman Susan Cox Powell, walks to a court hearing in Tacoma, Wash. An explosion at a Washington state home has killed Josh Powell and the couple's two young sons, officials said Sunday, Feb. 5, 2012. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)

Pat LaLama Reports: The Murder Of Sherri Rasmussen

February 06, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Follow Pat's daily coverage of the Stephanie Lazarus Trial.    Read her Bio >> ]

 

 

>>Day 1 of The Stephanie Lazarus Murder Trial<<

 

Stephanie lazarus“A bite, a bullet, a gun barrel and a broken heart.” That is the essence of the prosecution’s case against once revered LAPD detective Stephanie Lazarus, now on trial for the brutal murder of a beautiful nursing supervisor 26 years ago. Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney Shannon Presby passionately delivered his opening statement Monday morning to a jury of 8 women and 4 men. “This killing was personal”, he told the panel.

Presby portrayed Lazarus as a ruthless killer, obsessed over a case of unrequited love.  In 1986, Lazarus was a patrol officer who prosecutors say was devastated over a breakup with her boyfriend, John Ruetten. When Ruetten married another woman, 29 year old Sherri Rasmussen, Presby says Lazarus showed up at Rasmussen’s townhome, brutally beat the newlywed, bit her on the arm and shot her three times at close range. Prosecutors say Lazarus, trained in lock picking, snuck into the home. They also contend that Lazarus used a gun she had purchased from the LAPD and utilized her police knowledge of fingerprints to destroy evidence at the crime scene. Presby also contends that Lazarus used a robe to muffle the sound of gunshots.

At the time, LAPD detectives concluded the crime was a burglary gone wrong. Lazarus continued as a police officer and worked her way up the ranks—ultimately becoming a detective in the LAPD elite Commercial Crimes division. She married a fellow cop and they adopted a little girl.

The case remained unsolved for nearly two decades, until cold case detectives took a second look. Now, using DNA analysis, they determined the bite mark belonged to a woman. Upon further analysis, Presby told the jury the DNA “matched to the exclusion of every other single person on this planet”.

As Presby laid out his case, photographs of a smiling Sherri Rasmussen flashed on a giant screen. They quickly dissolved into images of her battered body. Her father Nels, sitting behind me, broke into tears.

Lazarus didn’t look up from the counsel table where she is seated with her attorney Mark Overland. Her hair was neatly pulled back. She wore a black suit and glasses as she pored over documents and took notes. It was easy to imagine her as a diligent detective. She has the look. Except now, she is a murder defendant.

Overland used the morning in his opening statement to dispute the reliability of the evidence against Lazarus. He told the jury that over the years, the bite mark DNA has been compromised by a questionable chain of custody. “It violated every procedure”, Overland said. He showed the jury pictures of a torn evidence bag and an unsealed tube. In Overland’s words, “the prosecution utterly failed to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt. Not even close.”

First witnesses are up next.   

>>Read Pat's Day Two Coverage Of The Trial

 

Share Your Thoughts About This Case On Our Facebook Page

 

 

 

Photo credit: AP Photos

 

Sexual Predator Teachers: Are We Protecting the Children or the Criminals?

[ By Dr. Kenneth J. Ryan, a criminologist at California State University. Here's his take on the recent sex crimes against children making headline news today. Read his Bio >>

 

Id-blog-sex-predator-020612Recent headlines have been filled with news regarding the arrests of teachers for the alleged sexual abuse of children.  For example, football coach Jerry Sandusky of Penn State dominated these sensational stories late last year beginning with reports of a co-worker who saw Sandusky rape a 10 year-old boy.  Since the original allegations were made, others have come forward with similar accusations.  Sandusky is currently awaiting trial on fifty-two counts relating to the sexual abuse of twelve children.

Here in California, two teachers from Miramonte Elementary School in Los Angeles recently were arrested in separate cases.  Police allege that Mark Berndt, 61, had sexually abused as many as twenty-three children during his thirty-two year career.  According to published reports, complaints about inappropriate sexual contact between Berndt and elementary school children date back as far as 1990.  It was unclear what actions the school district may have taken during that period, but Berndt was not arrested based on student allegations until recently.

Martin Springer of Miramonte Elementary was arrested on Friday, February 3, 2012, for allegedly fondling a 7 year-old girl.  The police statement announcing the arrest suggested there were two victims, but more specifics were not given.  Springer and Berndt worked together and were involved in school functions and recently it was alleged that at least one of the victims was shared in 2008.  The shared victim, a young girl, reported separate incidents to her parents who notified police; however, the parents never heard back from authorities and the parents took no further action.

Neng Yang recently pled “not guilty” to forty-five counts of child molestation and recording the abuse while he served as a teacher at an elementary school in Clovis, California.  The Fresno County District Attorney’s Office charges that Yang sexually assaulted a seven year-old girl and photographed the acts on his cell phone.  Yang has also been charged in Federal Court for producing child pornography.

Recently I was asked by a NBC News affiliate if child molestation by teachers was on the rise, and I responded with a sound-bite: probably not, but reporting the crimes was substantially up.  Whereas this is true, the real answer is much more complicated than that.  To begin with, no one really has any idea how much child sexual abuse is going on.

The FBI’s annual Uniform Crime Report is limited by what the states’ Attorneys General reports to them.  The states’ Attorneys General data is limited by what the local and state police tell them is reported on the official record.  You can see the actual number of crimes dwindling already.  There are also cases that never make it to the courts for “insufficient evidence” but for the victims’ statements and those crimes never reported to the police by the parents or school.  Remember that we as a society have “hushed-up” past crimes such as these to avoid scandal.  In handling past offenders, a sex predator teacher might be dismissed quietly and, thereafter, teach at another school to molest children again.  With none paying attention to the crimes, they go unnoticed, unreported, and ignored; thus, the child molester will strike again.  And that truly is a tragedy.

To make matters worse, the National Crime Victimization Survey conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (US Department of Justice), is a massive undertaking to determine anonymously how much crime really occurs in the United States, reported and not.  However, the NCVS does not collect information from anyone who is a crime victim under the age of twelve.  Therefore, incredibly, child sexual abuse is largely unaccounted for in US crime statistics and the offense is ignored by those responsible for crime accounting in America.

The problem as I see it is this: no one is really listening to the children.  Even if they do what they should and tell their parents about abuse, do the parents report it to the police?  Are the police and the courts handling the matter responsibly?  Not always, is the unsettling answer to both questions.  And what of the school districts?  It may be telling that the complaints against one of the Miramonte defendants go back at least two decades and nothing effective was done by the school district to stop the abuse.   At this writing, at least one law suit has been filed charging as much.  As for the federal government, the NCVS is not interested in child sexual abuse victims and it hasn’t been interested since its inception.  Thus, the crimes committed by child molesters do not exist in the eyes of our own government.

In the end, if one truly wants to ferret out child sexual abuse by teachers, perhaps it’s best to begin by starting at home and having a chat with those under your own roof.

 

Share Your Thoughts About This Case On Our Facebook Page

 

Photo Credit: Ariel Skelley/Blend Images/Corbis

Pat LaLama Reports: Harry Burkhart’s Burning Love

January 26, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Here's her take on a Tinsel Town case where truth is definitely stranger then fiction.    Read her Bio >> ]

  

This is a true crime story involving  three countries, Nazi conspiracies, Jim Morrison’s former home, fraud, Tantric massage,  and an arsonist on the loose near the Hollywood Walk of Fame. This of course, is Los Angeles where truth is stranger than fiction.


Harry-burkhart53 year old German national Dorothee Burkhart was arrested last December 28 in Hollywood, California. She’s wanted back in Germany on 16 counts of fraud and three counts of embezzlement involving shoddy real estate scams and skipping out on a $10,000 bill for breast augmentation.

Upon her arrest, Dorothee’s devoted 24 year old son Harry appeared traumatized. At his mother’s hearing in Federal court in downtown Los Angeles, Harry railed on the judge—threw F-bombs and insults at the United States—and professed his undying hatred for each and every American.

Dorothee’s arrest was a long time coming. In 2007 she was in police custody in Germany. After suffering chest pains, authorities brought Dorothee to a hospital for examination. She escaped through a window and ran to a train station.

Since then, mother and son have carved out a vagabond lifestyle that spanned three countries…Germany, Canada (where the pair was cared for by members of the Mennonite community) and by 2010, the United States. Dorothee and Harry had most recently been living in a modest Hollywood apartment building.  No one is certain what either does for a living, but Dorothee is linked to a service that provides “professional” body massages. “Doctor sexologist and tantra goddess” reads the website advertisement.

By all accounts, the two were inseparable. Harry appeared childlike and suffered from myriad mental disorders. Dorothee’s sole mission was to fiercely protect her son from anyone who sought to do him harm.

Just after Dorothee’s December arrest, Los Angeles went up in flames. A good chunk of it anyway. 51 arson fires were set over a four day period—between December 30th and January 2nd. Most of the fires started in parking garages, but many spread to nearby buildings including the former home of legendary Doors lead singer, Jim Morrison. No one was seriously injured but the fires caused more than three million dollars in damage. Firefighters were hard pressed to keep up. Cops were on high alert. The city was terrorized. The elusive arsonist was even torching the famed Hollywood and Highland entertainment complex near the iconic Walk of Fame. L.A. residents and throngs of tourists here for the New Year’s holiday were terrorized. Angelinos had not seen a rash of fires like this since the infamous Los Angeles riots of 1992.

Police released surveillance tape from one of the fire scenes. It showed the face of the man they suspected was starting the blazes. Not long after, a keen eyed deputy U.S. Marshall recognized that face when the surveillance video was shown on television. He was certain it was the same young man he had witnessed in federal court a few days earlier displaying the-anti America tirade. Federal agents and L.A. arson investigators joined forces and soon identified the suspect. Harry Burkhart.

In the early morning hours of January 2nd, reserve Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputy Shervin Lalezary spotted Harry Burkhart on Sunset Boulevard driving a blue minivan with Canadian plates. Fire-starting materials were found in the van. Burkhart was taken into custody. Later, investigators found newspaper clippings about the fires in Burkhart’s apartment. Police believe Burkhart, distraught over his mother’s arrest and potential deportation, set the fires in retaliation.

On Tuesday, Harry Burkhart pleaded not guilty to 100 arson-related counts in connection with 49 fires that erupted in Hollywood, West Hollywood and the San Fernando Valley. If convicted of all charges he faces 80 years in prison. In defense of her son, Dorothee displayed her own dramatic outbursts, blaming German Nazi’s for the fires. She insists that she and her son have been the target of a Nazi conspiracy that has spanned ten years.

For mother and son the separation is torment. It’s been three weeks since they have spoken. Harry is being held in county jail on $7.5 million dollars bail. He is also suspected of arson in Germany and being investigated for similar crimes in Canada. His next hearing is March 1 in Los Angeles.

Dorothee is in the custody of federal authorities and is due back in court February 7th.  A lawyer is trying to arrange a meeting between them.

A German lawyer, who once represented Dorothee, described this mother-son relationship as mutually dependent. He told the Los Angeles Times, “They were somehow like one, that one could not exist without the other, all they had was the other one.” At least for now, Dorothee Burkhart’s dreams of protecting her troubled son have been reduced to ashes.

 

Like this story? Give us your comments here on ID's Facebook page or join other ID Addicts in discussion here.

 

 

 

In this image taken from video released on Jan. 2, 2012 by OnScene.tv, arson suspect Harry Burkhart, 24, a German national, is arrested in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles. Burkhart was pulled over by a reserve sheriff's deputy and later booked for investigation of arson of an inhabited dwelling. Since the arrest, firefighters have not responded to any other suspicious fires. Police declined to reveal any motive for more than 50 fires that have occurred since Friday in Hollywood, neighboring West Hollywood and the San Fernando Valley, causing about $3 million in damage. (AP Photo/OnScene.tv)

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Casey Anthony's 4 Minutes Of Fame

January 06, 2012

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective on the latest sighting of Casey Anthony. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

 

The mystery around the "illegal" release of Casey Anthony's video blog offers more food for thought about Casey Anthony's plan to come back out into the spotlight and her hopes to get paid for TV or internet appearances. Sure, her lawyers say it was hacked via Skype -- but let's  recall the photos of Casey that appeared last fall -- those were orchestrated -- with careful placement of an Ohio ball cap on Casey's head and studious glasses that allowed people to recognize her eyes. Someone paid big money for those photos (that's my educated guess) because they were taken with Casey openly shopping in a store window on an empty sidewalk. If real paparazzi had been after her -- we would have seen photos of her fighting off the cameras, wearing dark shades, and covering her face. Right?? Now, on January 5, 2012, we see an October 14th video clip released to a Facebook site. Take a careful look at this "private video blog" and you will notice that this clip was edited in such a way that oddly, tells us nothing of significance, AND it's in black and white, which signals that it was doctored. Allegedly, someone leaked Casey's blog to a "Casey" Facebook site and wanted $3 per view.

IMO, Casey needs money, but moreover, she misses being a "star" and wants to test the waters to see how much attention she can garner.  After all Casey is, first and foremost, a narcissist. In the short four minute video clip she uses the word "me" or "mine" over 40 times. Casey's world is still all about HER. It's sick that she mentions her newly adopted dog, not her dead baby, not her wounded parents. She also mentions she wants to use the blog as a way to get used to the camera. Huh?

This woman has a PhD in mugging for the camera. Someone doctored and edited this "video blog" and I have a good hunch about who's behind it... More to come...

Pat LaLama: Casey Anthony's Latest PR Stunt

January 05, 2012

[ Pat LaLama's stellar career in broadcast journalism is a chronicle of some of the most iconic events in modern history.  Here's her take on Casey Anthony's lastest stunt.    Read her Bio >> ]

  

Casey Anthony is picking up right where she left off…as an insufferable self-serving manipulator with an insatiable urge to draw attention to her sociopathic self.  In her first “video diary” posted on YouTube, the once accused baby killer sports a new chic, short blond hairstyle and offers up nearly four and half minutes of vacuous mutterings.

Naturally, as the posting is introduced into the public consciousness, we the media, with our own “can’t look away from the train wreck” sensibility, must ponder and analyze Anthony’s senseless, empty utterances which offer no socially redeeming message.

Let’s begin with her feigned fear of making the video in the first place. “I don’t know whether to look directly at myself or look up or…this is a little scary because I hate being on camera,”she utters timidly into the lens. Let’s get this straight. Casey Anthony’s world class love affair with herself is the driving force behind this “production”. She’s addicted to attention—got plenty of it throughout her life and was soaked in it during her sensational trial. Now she’s suffering from withdrawals.

Anthony makes absolutely no mention of her daughter, her parents or her trial. “The good thing is that things are starting to look up and things are starting to change in a good way,” she offers. What things? What’s good? What’s changing?  Is there any self-reflection? Remorse?  Anger?  Sorrow?

Anthony is thrilled that technology will help plaster her conscienceless self-promotion all over the globe. “I’m excited that I’ll be able to Skype and obviously keep a video log, take some pictures…”

How fabulously convenient for you Ms. Anthony.  A worldwide forum all for yourself—and you don’t even have to respond to a single question about your beautiful, dead baby girl.  AND you can use this technological tool to raise money. AND in your inimitable fashion, perhaps you can market yourself to the hordes of clueless men who somehow find you “hot”.

“Now I in some ways have someone to talk to even when I am by myself so I am not bothering the poor dog who I have adopted and I love,” she says.  Love? Did you say love, Ms. Anthony? Imagine the sweet conversations you could have been having with a certain adoring little girl.

Boredom sets in quickly watching this abomination. It didn’t take long for my eyes to wander off Anthony’s giant black framed glasses onto the picture frames that serve as a background for the video. There is not a single photograph of her deceased child.

Anthony doesn’t tell us where she is—she only mentions that she will remain in the undisclosed Florida location until February, while she completes the terms of her probation for check fraud. She does promise more videos in the future. “This is the first of many, and I’m looking forward to this”.

One of Anthony’s lawyers insists she did not post the video diary—that it was hacked. I’ll let you be the judge on that.

Finally, I’m particularly troubled by one thought offered by this classic narcissistic. “I have something to call mine”, says the sympathy-seeking Anthony.  Well Ms. Anthony, the thing you once had that really mattered was a wonderful child named Caylee-- found dead in a swamp. But I guess that’s all in the past.


What do you think about Casey's video to the world?

Give us your thoughts on our Investigation Discovery Facebook Page

 

Related Links:
>>Watch Video: Dr. G: Inside the Caylee Anthony Case

>>Read: Full Casey Anthony Trial Coverage

The Casey Anthony Trial: Nothing but the Truth?

June 24, 2011

[ By Dr. Kenneth J. Ryan, a criminologist at California State University. ]

Casey-caylee-anthony-350x250 In every American courtroom witnesses are sworn to an oath before questioning and, in some variant or another, all promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.  The progress of the Casey Anthony trial thus far has put the oath itself on trial and stretched thin its meaning.

In a trial that has focused on the bizarre, deceptive conduct of the defendant, allegedly to conceal the murder of her daughter, recent discoveries suggest that Casey Anthony may have lied not only to family, friends, the police, press and general public, but also to her attorney regarding the death of her daughter.  The tale of Caylee Anthony’s drowning in the family swimming pool remarkably parallels that of the defendant’s tragic jail cellmate whilst locked up several years ago.  Nevertheless, Casey Anthony telling teary lies has become so commonplace that it is rarely news anymore and we greet each new slander with a shrug.  But what of the other courtroom players?

 

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>


The defense expert witness in so-called “touch DNA” who promised to tell the whole truth, omitted to reveal in direct examination regarding his scientific credentials that he has no terminal degree in biology, anthropology or physics and was, in fact, a student lab technician who works in a barn.  Another defense expert witness who promised to tell nothing but the truth testified that she believed a dog or coyote had buried Caylee Anthony’s skull, a suggestion so silly that it drew a reluctant, macabre laugh from the gallery.

And another defense expert witness who swore an oath to tell the whole truth castigated the medical examiner for performing a shoddy autopsy on Caylee Anthony because she did not remove the top of the child’s skull to examine the interior of the empty brain pan.  On the other hand, commonly accepted protocol for an autopsy on skeletal remains does not require removing the top of the skull, particularly since there has been no testimony from either side to suggest that head trauma was suspected in the death.  And so, in a procedure that paralleled arranging deck chairs on the Titanic, the witness sawed child’s skull in half.  What did he discover?  Nothing unusual.  It may not be actionable to suggest that the medical examiner’s work is shoddy, but intellectual dishonesty while under oath in a murder trial should be.

Meanwhile, George Anthony’s purported mistress volunteered to the National Enquirer that in an intimate moment he revealed that Caylee Anthony’s death was an accident.  But earlier she told police investigators that she was not intimate with him.  Was she lying then or is she lying now?  Consider exactly what she is saying and you be the judge: she lied to police investigators conducting an investigation into the murder of a child, but she told the National Enquirer the truth.  Soon she will promise to tell nothing but the truth and I imagine that thereafter we’ll know even less than we do today.

We have yet to see the defendant take the stand; but before she does, Casey Anthony will have to swear to tell nothing but the truth.  Why don’t we just skip this step for brevity’s sake, it doesn’t mean a thing in this trial.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 24: Embattled Defense Soldiers On

June 22, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Chorus of defense witnesses ends on sour note  

Day-24-casey-anthony-blog-062311 ORLANDO, Fla. — Marcus Wise’s courtroom debut as an expert witness went well, but the analytical chemist’s experiments failed defense lawyer Jose Baez. 

Other troubles for Baez, however, arose.


Inmate’s Pool Drowning Story Similar to Anthony's Account

A former jail mate of Casey Anthony, Amy Whalen's story of her child’s drowning mirrors Casey Anthony's defense -- state attorneys are currently investigating.   Whalen may be called to testify.

This potential wrinkle in the thin fabric of the defense strategy arrived when a citizen’s phone call late last week prompted authorities to look further at a woman whose five-day Orange County jail stay in June, 2009, put her in the same dorm as Anthony.

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

 

Cells Not Soundproof

April Whalen's booking records indicate she had been arrested 10 times between 2000 and 2009.

With the jury absent, prosecutrix Linda Drane-Burdick conveyed the information to Judge Perry, noting that the state has sent investigators to interview Whalen.

The 15-month-old son of Casey’s former jailmate reportedly drowned on Christmas Day, 2007, and was discovered by his grandfather.

Although there was no direct contact between the two prisoners — Casey Anthony is in protective custody and therefore closely monitored — cells are not soundproof and voices carry. 


“Judge: Enough is Enough.”

Having already tested the patience of Judge Perry for the second straight day, Baez and prosecutor Jeff Ashton had angered the jurist, who halted yesterday’s 23rd day of trial, sent the jury out and indicated his displeasure for the two, pronouncing, “enough is enough” of “gamesmanship” and “friction between attorneys.”

The two lawyers had been practicing what Perry identified as “trial by ambush.”

In Baez’s case, not conveying to defense experts the necessity of including last-minute reports made it difficult to prepare cross-examination questions. 

With his witnesses list out of order and having some experts who were not allowed to testify in full, Baez was struggling to put on science evidence that had any discernable flow.

Wise, an analytic chemist from Oak Ridge laboratories, tested carpet samples from Casey Anthony’s foul-smelling car trunk, and reported he found unexpectedly high chloroform levels.


Chloroform “Peaks” “Surprise” to Wise

The amiable witness, who kept his cool despite extensive questioning by both sides, could not explain the chloroform “peaks” or “base levels” obtained from the gas chromatograph mass spectrometer, or GC-MS tests, even sitting down to discuss his results with colleague Arpad Vass, who testified for the prosecution on decomposition related assays of carpet samples from Anthony’s car.

Testifying prior to Wise, Dutch forensic scientist Richard Eikelenboom handed the jury information concerning “low copy number DNA,” in which very small amounts of the genetic substance could be used to obtain profiles from duct tape covering the mouth area of murder victim Caylee Anthony.

Relating that DNA materials could have stuck to the tape’s adhesive side, Eikelenboom admitted during cross that heat and water would have had “a very detrimental effect” on the material attached to the child’s skull, and on the separate tape found on the ground and away from the skull.

Ashton also drew from the Dutch researcher that his academic status was somewhere between a bachelor’s and below a master’s degree, and that his laboratory is in a converted barn.

In 2008, Eikelenboom's DNA work helped to free Tim Masters, who was convicted for murder, after Eikelenboom and his wife found new DNA evidence.  Eikelenboom said prosecutors didn’t want to him to have possession of the Henkel duct tape -- the testimony launched Jeff Ashton into heated objections.

Without the jury, Perry questioned Eikelenboom on whether he knew that opinions he planned on presenting should be submitted in writing by a certain time, with the DNA lab founder saying Baez did not make him aware of that.

Ruling the defense violation “willful” and “substantial,” Perry scheduled a hearing for more of Eikelenboom’s future testimony.  

Expect to hear more DNA testimony from the gene material-hunting pioneer, who related in his prosecution deposition that it is possible to recover DNA from human decomposition fluid.

That information prompted arguments from Baez, but Perry deferred his decision on whether to allow it, until a hearing could be scheduled to iron out this and any other potential “ambush” issues, “since it looks like we’re going to be doing this for the next two weeks.”

Related Links:

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Photo Caption: Defense attorney Jose Baez during the Casey Anthony trial at the Orange County Courthouse in Orlando, Fla. on Tuesday, June 21, 2011. (Credit: Red Huber, Orlando Sentinel)

 

Aphrodite Jones Reports: On Celebrity in the Casey Anthony Trial Courtroom

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.  Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports I wrote a piece in today's NY POST talking about all the "star" journalists and TV personalties who have descended on this trial: Geraldo, Greta, Nancy Grace, Jane Velez Mitchell, Ashleigh Banfield, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Judge Alex Ferrer --- have all been here. We "national media folks" are hidden up in the balcony of the courtroom (yes -- there's a balcony!). 

The OC Court administrators did not want jurors distracted by Greta or Nancy Grace sightings -- which makes sense -- but is also just a weird fact of today's world that people fuss over TV reporters. Seems media stars are as much of a draw for the public as the actual trial itself.

I must say, that on a day like today, where the testimony is so scientific and dry -- with witnesses breaking things down to "ionized molecules," perhaps the jury could use a break from these dry FBI witnesses, who all seem to be monotone in their delivery.  I'm sure the jurors are taking their job very seriously -- and they are listening carefully to this scientific jargon and trying to make sense of it. Still, I bet they could use a dose of the "celebrity factor" right about now. Anything to distract them from testimony that is almost as painful as having a tooth extracted -- would probably be welcomed by the jurors. Today, more than ever, I feel their pain. We are not experts -- we are not scientists -- and the battle of the experts does NOT take away the stench of death inside Casey Anthony's car. The jury will use their common sense when they get back there to deliberate. So far, in my 22 years of trial coverage, that's been my experience. In the end, common sense wins -- or at least -- I hope so!

 

Related Links:

NY Post: Inside the Casey media carnival
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 23: Sweetening Casey Anthony's Motherly Image

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Day-23-casey-anthony-blog-062111 ORLANDO, Fla. — It’s not about the knot.  Really.  It’s about what the knot represents: the knot resulting from Casey Anthony’s back-handed tying of her sweater’s slack material into a tight, round ball at the back of the pale green garment’s waistline for her court appearance today.  

Sugar-sweet

In efforts to present her to the jury as a modest, caring, sugary sweet mother caught up in a grandly dysfunctional family, whose toxic relationships made her do all the things we know she has done — and possibly more — the defense has provided Anthony with a number of casual and understated tops, blouses and sweaters to wear during trial. 

Reportedly, Casey’s chair has been lowered to make her look very tiny, to suggest “poor little Casey against the world.”

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

“O.J. Courtroom”

Anthony must be experiencing some hand circulation issues, as well — recalling her “attacks” during jury selection — that require warm clothing.  Nothing out of the ordinary there; reportedly the newly constructed suite, nicknamed the “O.J. courtroom,” is cold.

The woman’s defense is trying its best, they believe, to defend her and save her life.  Doubtless they are too busy with witnesses and an irate judge to notice Anthony’s styling gaffs or that her body language and grooming gestures continue to shout, “Notice my figure!”


Chatty Casey

The defendant could not be left alone.  Various people sat down with Anthony, chatted for a while and left, to be replaced immediately with another team member.  Anthony seemed to respond to each person with the same degree of excited chattiness, which does indicate she longs for regular conversation.

If the former shot girl eliminated the constant preening, pulling at clothes, arching her back and throwing her chest forward, Anthony might seem more sympathy-deserving.  No easy thing to look on her now.

It is troubling that Casey Anthony is on trial for her life, and that she seems more concerned — no, obsessed — with keeping her shirts tightly tucked-in or vamping in revealing sweaters.  This is distracting and a no-no that her team’s strategists easily can fix.  And they should.

Her defense speaks one thing: that she was sexually abused; but Casey Anthony’s behavior says another.  She is reminiscent of an animal grooming its fur, meticulously, repeatedly washing itself: behavior likely to be “explained” by another expert witness.

Related Links:

NY Post: Inside the Casey media carnival
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Photo Caption: Judge Belvin Perry talks to attorneys about delays in the Casey Anthony trial before the start of court at the Orange County Courthouse in Orlando, Fla. on Monday, June 20, 2011. The case was recessed for the day without the jury ever being brought in because of problems brining in witnesses for the defense. (Credit: Red Huber, Orlando Sentinel)

Aphrodite Jones Reports, Casey Anthony Trial: 'Craziest Defense I've Ever Heard'

June 16, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Casey-anthony-blog-061611 Today marks the 3-year anniversary of Caylee Anthony's death. I think of her, as she might be today -- a gorgeous 6-year-old dressed in pink frills and with bows in her hair, playing dress up in the doll house at her home. Instead, as we all sit here listening to matters of DNA, duct tape and a mysterious shovel -- her mom sits very still. It's amazing to watch Casey Anthony take on a freeze-frame position as her daughter's remains are being picked apart by legal and scientific banter. How does she do it? Nothing seems to unnerve her. It's the craziest thing I've ever seen in my life! The only thing crazier is her defense -- that being abused made her hide secrets about her daughter's death. Only a man might believe that one. Every woman on Earth knows Mom a  would claw and kick to find a way to save her baby!

How ironic that this is the very day the defense is beginning its case. George knows he will be under attack -- but I believe his tears this morning came from the sheer grief he must feel at the loss of his little angel. I cannot fathom that Cindy had any idea about her daughter's involvement in Caylee's death -- but I do wonder if George somehow knew, and helped his daughter in a desperate attempt, perhaps, during the aftermath. Maybe his tears come from feelings of guilt as well; if nothing else, he sees now, in a court of law, just how cold/hearted his daughter is -- and she is a product of his upbringing.

On another related matter, let's not forget that Miss Casey is good at wrapping men around her finger. Just notice, now, what she has Jose Baez believing. I mean, really, there's no woman on earth who would buy the story that because Casey was allegedly abused, she did not show grief for her dead daughter. This is the craziest defense I've ever heard, just speaking as a woman. In fact, Casey has now managed to insult the victims of sexual abuse, inferring that they are not capable of showing feelings. And all of this -- for what?  To confuse the jury with the notion that she's a person raised to keep secrets. Okay. So -- what has that got to do with searching for your missing child?  Or crying for your dead child?  Any woman I know would raise hell to find their child ... And would shed tears to heaven ... If their child accidentally died.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Photo Caption: An image displayed on a courtroom monitor shows a photo entered into evidence in the Casey Anthony trial at the Orange County Courthouse on Friday, June 10, 2011. The photo shows Caylee Anthony and her mother Casey. An expert witness used this photo to superimpose an image of Caylee's skull to mark where duct tape found on the remains would have been positioned on the child when she was alive. (Credit: Joe Burbank, Orlando Sentinel)

Casey Anthony and Rational Behavior: Doing the Math

[ By Dr. Kenneth J. Ryan, a criminologist at California State University. ]

Trail-casey-anthony-blog-rational-behavior-061611 There’s a theory in economics (sorry, folks, I’m a professor; I roll this way), that says roughly, a rational person will always act in his or her own best interests.  This means that everyone does a little mental math before acting, whether consciously or not; and whatever the outcome is, if we are rational we always act to best serve ourselves.  Our calculations include weighing the pros and cons, the benefits and costs and occasionally, the rewards and punishments.  I’m a personal fan of this theory and, as theories go, it has more weight than most economics in the real world.  But if this theory has any truth to it, the activities of Casey Anthony after the death of her child are quite difficult to understand.

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

What was the mental calculus that caused Casey Anthony to mislead her family and friends as to the whereabouts of her child?  What pros and cons did she rationally weigh to arrive at the fiction that “Zanny the Nanny” kidnapped her child, but somehow it wasn’t a good idea to report it to the police?  What was the mental cost-benefit calculation that Casey Anthony made before she led the police on a wild-goose chase around the Universal employee buildings in search of an imaginary office?  The litany of bizarre outcomes and events stemming from the mind of Casey Anthony are almost endless.

Nevertheless, there can be two perfectly logical explanations for Casey Anthony’s behavior.  The first and perhaps the most obvious is that she is not rational.  Her behavior would be nearly understandable, if not predictable, if we first assume that she is unable to reason, which means simply that she cannot calculate her own best interests.  In other words, she can’t do the math.  At trial, it should not be difficult for Jose Baez to establish this since, if it is true, she will be irrational in all things, not just the matter at hand.  But then again, surely an irrational person can commit murder.

The other logical explanation is that Casey Anthony is rational and that her actions and deliberate deceptions indeed were meant to serve her own best interests.  If Casey Anthony murdered Caylee, it would be rational to expect her to lie to those who would expect to see the child alive.  Certainly it would be rational to expect her to attempt to deceive the police.  It would be rational to expect her to offer explanations of the murder that minimize her own involvement or culpability.  It also would be rational to anticipate that she may commit murder to further her own best interest, such as improving her lifestyle as she saw it.

The jury soon will decide if Casey Anthony is guilty or not.  And, in so doing, they likely shall decide if Casey Anthony was rational or not.  Like it or not, the jury doubtless will need to use some very good economic theory.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health


Photo Caption: Casey Anthony before the start of court during day 18 of her first-degree murder trial at the Orange County Courthouse, in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, June 14, 2011. (Credit: Red Huber/Orlando Sentinel/POOL)

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 18: Jury Examines Defendant’s ‘Bella Vita’ Tattoo

June 15, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey Anthony Bella Vita ORLANDO, Fla. -- Bella Vita. The jury eyed an FBI evidence photograph of Casey Anthony’s infamous “beautiful life” tattoo behind her left shoulder during day 18 of her first-degree murder trial. 

Bella Vita, Then Pizza

Learning also that during her July 2 visit to Cast Iron Tattoos — approximately 17 days after prosecutors say she murdered her daughter — the jury heard testimony that the defendant treated those in the shop to pizza after the appointment. On June 15, the state plans to translate into English for the jury the words Bella Vita.  The state could choose to reference the tattoo in their summation, helping to show a motive of wanting freedom to pursue the unfettered lifestyle she demonstrated after Caylee was last seen.

A Mother’s “I Love You”

Today’s proceedings took on airs of symbolism.  From the defense table, Casey Anthony considered the remnants of her “beautiful life.”  Later, she seemed to pay more attention to the FBI’s evidence photograph of her tattooed left shoulder than she did to her mother, who mouthed, “I love you,” after testifying and passing her daughter.  Turning her head away, Anthony denied her mother a single nod, in much the same way she has made minimal eye contact with either parent.

Cindy Anthony had just testified she never had seen the pink “trouble comes in small packages” shirt, whose remnants were discovered among her granddaughter’s bones off Suburban Drive;  when asked, the defendant’s mother said she also had not seen Caylee’s “Winnie the Pooh” blanket since May 2008.  

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

 

Caylee’s Blanket

Mud-stained portions of a blanket that Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Jan Garavaglia testified as being “Winnie the Pooh with Tigger on his back” had weathered Tropical Storm Fay, which flooded the dumping ground in August 2008.  Caylee’s body had been discarded at the site.

During her direct examination of Cindy, state prosecutrix Linda Drane Burdick methodically shaped testimony to eliminate most maternal line family members as mitochondrial matches from the single decomposition-related human hair found in Casey Anthony’s car trunk.  Questioning the defendant’s mother about hair color, length and whether or not their hair had been processed, Drane Burdick aimed to establish that the single “death-banded” hair belonged to none other than the victim. 

State Pins Down Hair

Prior to Cindy Anthony’s testimony, Catherine Theisen, an FBI forensic mitochondrial DNA analyst, identified evidence she worked on in the case, including buccal, or cheek swabs collected from Casey Anthony and hair samples from the car trunk and the victim’s skull, with both hair samples being naturally brown. The expert said Caylee Anthony and her mother, Casey, “could not be excluded” from likely donors. 

Under cross-examination by Jose Baez, Cindy Anthony said that during the eight years the Anthonys owned the car, all family members had different colors and lengths of hair.

Other crucial testimony sought to buttress the state’s case:
·    Heart-shaped stickers in Casey Anthony’s room, found during a Dec. 20, 2008, search warrant, were similar to a single sticker found on cardboard near Caylee’s remains.
·    Pizza to Cast Iron Tattoos:  During cross-examination of Cast Iron Tattoos’ owner/operator, Bobby Williams,  who designed and created Casey Anthony’s “Bella Vita” tattoo, said Casey Anthony “didn’t seem upset about anything” during her July 2 visit to the shop and that she ordered and paid for pizza that day.  Anthony was “pretty happy for the most part.”  The pizza delivery bill was $65, Williams noted, which Anthony paid for with cash.

Tattoo as Memorial?

On cross examination, Jose Baez elicited testimony from Williams that people sometimes get tattoos to memorialize someone who died; on redirect, Frank George for the state asked the witness if Casey was “mournful.”  A sidebar followed.

After moving for a mistrial based on a number of supposed missteps by the prosecution, claimed Cheney Mason for the defense, Judge Perry declined to make that ruling.

Prosecutor Jeff Ashton advised the court that the state has two more evidentiary items they wish to enter into evidence on June 15, actions which will conclude the state’s case.

Casey Anthony’s defense team begins its case in chief on June 15, although they are not required to do so.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Photo Credit: State Attorney's Office

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Cindy Anthony, A Woman in the Worst Position on Earth

June 14, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Casey-anthony-blog-061511 This afternoon -- watching Cindy Anthony try to walk a tightrope as she sat on the stand as a witness for the prosecution -- was truly excruciating. The poor woman was dragged through hellish testimony in order to ID photos of her daughter and granddaughter in happy times, back in 2007, when Caylee was about 18 months old.

There was cross examination about the Winnie the Pooh blanket of Caylee's and when it was perceived to be missing in the Anthony home. Cindy couldn't recall exactly when the blanket seemed to disappear from Caylee's bedding set -- but maybe she doesn't want to recall ... one can't blame her. Then there was the nightmare of Cindy having to ID the laundry bag (a perfect match to the white laundry bag found at the crime scene, which held Caylee's remains) which had once been used to hold Caylee's stuffed animals in her room -- which was missing from Caylee's room as well. What a horrible thing to have to try to recall -- and mull over in your mind -- as the whole world seems to be watching and scrutinizing your every move.

But by far, the hardest thing Cindy had to think about today, was the question by Mr. Baez about the shorts Caylee wore in the same photo shown -- when Caylee was held by an ecstatic Casey Anthony at around age 18 months -- which appear to be  the exact shorts found at the crime scene. Mr. Baez noted that the person who placed these shorts on an almost 3-year-old Caylee did not realize they were way too small for the child.  The question Baez asked was quickly objected to by the state, so Cindy did not have to respond -- thank goodness!  But what Baez asked surely lingered in the minds of each juror.  And it left the message loud and clear -- that perhaps someone else dressed Caylee before she was laid to rest in the swampy area on Suburban Drive. And of course, we all know that Baez, in his upcoming defense, will point the finger at George being the culprit. ...

My heart breaks, once again, for Cindy Anthony, a woman, arguably, in the worst position on Earth: caught within the scrutiny of the justice system -- and, the battle to pit her between the possible guilt of her daughter and/or her husband, in the horrendous death of her innocent little granddaughter.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 

Photo Caption: Cindy Anthony testifies during day 18 of her daughter's first-degree murder trial at the Orange County Courthouse, in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, June 14, 2011. (Credit: Red Huber/Orlando Sentinel/POOL)

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 17: Judge Says Jury May Begin Deliberations June 25 or 27

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]


“What we don’t know is a wide universe of things we don’t know.”
— Judge Belvin Perry, June 13, 2011, ruling on admissibility of prosecution’s
hair banding Power Point presentation


Day-17-casey-anthony-blog-061611 ORLANDO, Fla. — The jury could begin deliberating Casey Anthony’s fate on June 25 or 27, Judge Perry announced prior to recessing the court midday on June 13. 

To everyone’s surprise, when the prosecution exhausted its witness list to date on day 17 of the first-degree murder trial, the judge in this sensational first-degree murder case inferred that the hurdle her lawyers face in saving her life is likely to commence in a scant two weeks from today.

Casey Anthony’s defense likely will take 13 to 15 days to put on their case, according to what her lawyers have indicated.

Hair-Banding Testimony Parted Ways with Visuals

Following the announcement, court recessed at noon until 1 p.m. on June 14, after two FBI experts presented their findings and briefed the jury on postmortem hair-banding.

Jurors learned that the process of decomposition, in which the hair of a dead person exhibits a characteristic dark, horizontal band at the hair shaft’s end near the root.  Hair banding, Anthony’s peers learned, is characteristic of human decomposition and appears solely with human decomposition and death.

Just before screening a PowerPoint report on a hair banding experiment conducted by FBI hair and fiber expert Stephen Shaw, the defense objected because Casey Anthony’s attorneys did not receive color copies of the state’s presentation in time to prepare a rebuttal.

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

 

“Troubled” Judge Excludes Hair-banding Visual

Defense medical consultant lawyer Dorothy Sims stated the Anthony defense team was denied color photos by the FBI, but received black and white copies of the state’s report. 

Judge Perry noted that he was “troubled” by what had transpired.

The chief judge did not allow the prosecution’s PowerPoint presentation, intended as a visual review of Shaw’s testimony.

After the lengthy sidebar, the prosecution cleverly managed to navigate around Judge Perry’s ruling by projecting a single photograph depicting the sole strand of death-banded hair discovered in the trunk of Anthony’s car.

Missing Heart

Earlier in the abbreviated 17th trial day, the long-anticipated heart sticker evidence was addressed.  When it initially appeared on CSI inspection, the heart sticker had been placed on the duct tape covering Caylee’s mouth, as if it were some indicator of emotion, during the body’s initial disposal. 

While testing individual pieces of the Henkel duct tape prosecutors say were used on Caylee Anthony, FBI latent print examiner Elizabeth Fontaine encountered sticky residue near the edge of one piece of tape found with the child’s skull.

“It was approximately the size of a dime,” Fontaine said of the heart-shaped substance, which intrigued investigators, who sought and subsequently discovered a package of heart stickers — with some stickers missing — in Casey Anthony’s room.

Fontaine said she completed the latent print search assignment before returning to photograph the sticky residue, and when she was able to address it, the sticky marker was gone.

Fontaine notified her superiors, who in turn notified Orange County of the incident early on in the multi-agency investigation.

Sticking Point: Was Additional Duct Tape Segment for Binding Caylee’s Hands?

Previously, Orange County CSI Jennifer Welch testified that she found a separate piece of duct tape 10 feet from where Caylee’s skull lay in the woods.  Between zero and four inches long and appearing like the Henkel duct tape associated with the skull, neither defense nor prosecutors examined Welch about the extra tape’s significance.

We wonder: did the additional tape found apart from the skull bind Caylee’s hands while she was still alive?  Could flooding have caused the separate piece of tape to be relocated from the child’s remains during Tropical Storm Fay? 

The storm hit Orlando on August 22, 2008, and, according to CSI investigators, turned what Casey’s friends term the dump site as “The Zone” into a swamp.

Very Latent Prints?

What about fingerprints on the additional piece of duct tape?  Although crime scene investigator Jennifer Welch found none, when and if more advanced methods of latent print visualization become available, revisiting the duct tape evidence as a whole might prove fruitful, if prior investigative procedures have not damaged the tape for further examination.

From fingerprint identification to DNA analysis, as in all science, law enforcement often must wait for and even mandate advances in evidence examination.  In this trial, the jury has entertained novel science in the form of
Dr. Arpad Vass’s testimony on decomposition.


Late-breaking:  Judge Belvin Perry announced after the jury was dismissed on Tuesday, June 14,  that the defense will begin its case in chief on Thursday, June 16.

At the same time, prosecutor Jeff Ashton noted they would be putting on a grief expert.

 

Related Links:

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

 

Photo Caption: Elizabeth Fontaine, a latent print expert for the FBI, testifies during the trial of Casey Anthony at the Orange County Courthouse on Monday, June 13, 2011. She is holding an evidence envelope that contains duct tape found at the crime scene. (Credit: Red Huber, Orlando Sentinel)


Casey Anthony Trial, Day 16: Experts Talk Bugs, Bones and ‘Burial’ Ground

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Day-16-casey-anthony-blog-061411 ORLANDO, Fla. — Dr. Neal Haskell is a farmer and rancher.  Dr. Haskell is also a forensic entomologist.  His knowledge of bugs attracted to decomposing human corpses supports the prosecution’s timetable for the murder and body dumping of Caylee Anthony. 

Caylee was almost 3 years old when attorneys for the state believe her mother killed her on June 16, 2008, hid her body in her mother’s car trunk and left it there, decomposing, according to Dr. Haskell, for “three, four or five days.”  How could he tell?

Remains in Trunk 3 to 5 Days, Says Dr. Haskell

Using his expertise on what type of “early colonizers” and later-arriving insect populations — and by careful assays of life cycles/generations of each insect stage within the same types of bugs -- Dr. Haskell was able to fix Caylee’s approximate time of death and how long her remains were in the trunk of Casey’s car.

To aid his findings, Dr. Haskell also plotted Orlando temperature in relation to insect life.  Because Caylee’s remains had been in the trunk, Dr. Haskell found that the “initial placement” of Caylee’s body “had excluded early [insect] colonizers.”

In other words, Dr. Haskell found that having been in the closed space kept away “many bugs” from the decomposing body and that the absence of certain insects was significant.

In his report, Dr. Haskell noted that in Casey Anthony’s Pontiac Sunfire automobile were “ . . . the presence of large numbers of larvae, puparia and some adults of Diptera phoridae [coffin flies], Megaselia scalaris, a species of scuttle fly/coffin fly recovered from the trunk ... and from inside the white plastic trash bag with blue handles ... [there appears to be] the presence of sufficient decompositional material to attract large numbers of this species.

Pinning down death in part, by the presence and number of coffin flies, Dr. Haskell factored in all his data to determine that Caylee’s remains were in the car trunk for three to five days before being dumped in the woods. 

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

Skull Found

The child’s remains “were then removed” and dumped, submerged under storm water for part of the time, when on Dec. 11, city meter reader, Roy Kronk discovered the victim’s skull less than 20 feet off Suburban Drive.

The location is less than a quarter-mile from the home Caylee and her mother shared with the child’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony.

Intact Skull Rarely Seen

Orange County CSI, Jennifer Welch, who collected evidence from the heavily overgrown, suburban Orlando scene, showed the jury some duct tape found not far from the body.  Duct tape also was wrapped around Caylee’s upper and lower jaw, maintains experts, who say this is why the skull was intact.  Plant roots also played a role in keeping the skull in one piece.

According to Chief Deputy Medical Examiner, Dr. Gary Utz, most skulls are not found with lower jaw bones still attached, because the flesh holding together the upper and lower structures decomposes.  Because the skull is relatively round, it tends to roll, explained Dr. Utz, leaving behind the maxilla, or lower jaw.

Turning their attention to an overall perspective, the jury saw a “3-D fly-through” computer animation video of the area where Caylee’s remains were discovered, or, as neighborhood teens call the area, “The Zone.” 

Defendant Casey Anthony had returned this June 11 to court, after becoming ill during the trial the previous day when hearing graphic testimony, including a description of the dispersal of her daughter’s skeleton and how animals may have chewed on some bones in the structure.

Casey Anthony, 25, is charged with capital murder of her daughter, who prosecutors say on June 16  killed her daughter and hid the toddler’s body first in her car trunk, then relocated the remains to woods off Suburban Drive in Orlando. 

During the 31 days Caylee had been missing, Casey Anthony partied, stayed at her boyfriend’s house, got a tattoo, “Bella Vita,” or “beautiful life" and went shopping, using checks she stole from her best friend, Amy Huizenga. 

Anthony has been jailed since August 29, 2008, while awaiting trial.

 

Related Links:

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Dr G. Medical Examiner - Watch Other Cases on Discovery Fit & Health

 


Photo Credit: Dr. Neal Haskell, an expert in forensic entomology, testifies during day 16 of Casey Anthony's first-degree murder trial at the Orange County Courthouse, in Orlando, Fla., Saturday, June 11, 2011. (Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel/POOL)

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Caylee Anthony's Remains Torn Apart by Animals

June 10, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports The stampede that occurred outside court this morning -- resulting in one woman being trampled and sent to the ER via ambulance -- really is indicative of just how crazy this trial has gotten.

The thing is, public observers who want to be a part of this, who want to judge Casey for themselves in person, probably got more than what they bargained for today. The prosecution put evidence on that was so gruesome and grizzly, people were visibly upset as they left the court for lunch break.  The truth is -- the idea of seeing crime scene photos, verses the reality of looking at photos of a tiny little skeleton, reconstructed from scraping and sifting through a real crime scene -- is a slap in the face for all of us -- to remind us of the harsh reality the jury faces here in this courtroom.

One good thing is that folks who are observing this as members of the public now know for sure that this is nothing like CSI or Law & Order.  We can all see and hear that this is a real life tragedy of epic proportions -- and today -- we were all witness to photos of the individual bones of Caylee Marie Anthony, whose body had been eaten apart and dragged through the woods by animals. To think of the photos of Caylee's bones that showed carnivores had been chewing on her little body -- well -- a lump comes to my throat just by mentioning those photos and that testimony.

I realize people want to see the ugly truth for themselves -- it's human nature to have a morbid curiosity, and that's why we all stop at traffic accidents, because it's a reminder of the possibility of our own mortality. Nonetheless, after having to observe the gruesome photos of the remains of this beautiful little toddler -- and then after lunch, having to listen to Dr. G (the medical examiner) testify about this child being tossed and dumped in a swampy area -- left "to rot" in the woods -- is particularly gut-wrenching. I hope that the people who have gotten into this courtroom will tell others that a death penalty case has actually no resemblance to any fictional TV show -- where all the evidence is neat and clean and all the testimony is scripted.

Today in this Orange County Courthouse, people saw horrific images coupled with dramatic testimony -- that will remain burned into their minds forever.  For my part, I know that little Caylee Anthony will continue to haunt each and every one of us -- both inside the courtroom and out -- as she "testifies" from the grave about the truth of her demise.

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 13: Internet Searches for “Neck-Breaking,” “Head Injuries” and “Chest Trauma“ Found

June 09, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-caylee-anthony-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. — For the last two days, Casey Anthony has seemed unusually preoccupied with two computers at the defense table.  As prosecutrix Linda Drane Burdick methodically introduced three computer experts to jurors — querying the cyber cops on tools used for locating key words and Internet addresses expressed in long strings of characters — a mystery language to most—it became clear what Anthony had been looking at all that time: computer searches for deadly things.

Some retrieved information didn’t make sense, but many of searches that had been performed on the Anthony home computer -- including terms such as “neck-breaking,” “head injuries” and “chest trauma“ -- seemed to support the prosecution’s case: that the young woman with historically no moral compass researched the Internet for any number of serious injuries -- and ways to kill

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

 

Chloroform, Chloroform, Chloroform

The day’s operative words in testimony: chloroform, chloroform, chloroform -- and the fact that  science project how-to web site, Sci-Spot.com, had been visited 84 times, using the HP desktop computer, from March 4 to March 21, 2008.  The state alleges Anthony’s daughter, Caylee, died on June 16, at the hands of her mother.

Although a current notice states the directions for producing chloroform have been taken down, Sci-Spot formerly contained a home recipe for making the noxious chemical used in the early days of anesthesia medicine and having retained a nasty reputation for rendering people senseless for a time — or forever.

The state’s computer forensics testimony began with expert witness, computer examiner, Detective Sandra Osborne, whose cyber-investigative job involves “any electronic device with a digital file.”

Within days after police were called to the Anthony house, Osborne received Compac laptop and HP desktop computers, Polaroid T730 and Nikon Coolpix digital cameras and a Nokia cell phone.  Her assignment was to look for any information relating to Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales: Caylee Anthony’s non-existent babysitter.

Osborne testified only one “Zenaida” was found in her search and she related her findings to her supervisor, Sgt. Kevin Stenger, of Orange County’s Computer Crimes, at the time. 

Stenger also testified and discussed the inner workings of the HP computer’s browser, Firefox.  He gave the jury a byte-sized view of how information is ostensibly deleted, but how, in actuality, files remain in History and how, even if data is deleted, the user’s name remains, along with files’ dates started and ended.

Cacheback, "Tool of Choice"

Looking next to a program called Cacheback, the “tool of choice” for Internet-related investigations, Stenger said he was able to task the program’s “architect,” John Bradley, who fixed a few bugs in the application, and was able to retrieve Internet history from March 17 to March 21, 2008.  Bradley also took the stand.

In having the three computer forensics experts testify, the prosecution was able to carefully lay a foundation for the largely incriminating searches for: “neck-breaking,” “head injuries” and “chest trauma.“  And as the state also must prove pre-meditation in this capital case, search dates occurred more than three months before Caylee Anthony’s death, circa June 16, 2008.

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Gruesome Photos of Caylee Anthony's Remains Revealed

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports Today is, by far, the hardest day of all. These crime scene photos of Caylee's skull embedded in brambles and surrounded by trash -- has caused jurors to shiver, news reporters to cry and Casey, to put on a show of grief -- that I don't think the jurors are buying.

The jurors are trying not to show the horror they must be feeling -- but some of the horror slips through the cracks of their poker faces. A few jurors rubbed their arms, as if they felt a shiver. One was rocking back and forth in his chair. The whole morning was consumed with gruesome photos of Caylee's skull -- covered in roots and also with her hair matted to it -- showing a large piece of silver duct tape that covered the front area of the skull, near the eye sockets. I have been sick with a stomach flu the last 3 days --- but I can honestly say that these photos have actually made me feel sick to my stomach all over again.

The close-ups of her skull -- mixed with leaf litter and debris, makes me heartsick. The long bones found -- belonging to Caylee -- were not mixed in with the other bones found in the garbage bag. They had to be retrieved separately ...

To look at this child's skull and bones -- left rotting in the woods, surrounded by garbage and having a partial beer bottle found near it -- is like a horror movie turned real. In fact, no horror movie could match the depiction of poor baby Caylee's remains. What monster created this? Perhaps it's that lady in the defendant seat -- with her head hanging down. Casey doesn't want to see her handiwork, maybe? If I were a juror -- that's what I'd be thinking right about now. It is terrifying to think that this baby was murdered in cold blood by her own mother -- and for what?  Because she wanted to be a party girl and drink a bunch of beer and have a NY boyfriend?  Believe me, every time we look at the skull again -- with hair matted and leaves and twigs surrounding it, with plant roots and duct tape attached to Caylee's little head -- especially seeing the eye sockets straight on with multiple strips of duct tape over the nose and mouth area -- there is a communal sick feeling in this courtroom. I make the sign of the cross for this baby and her innocent little soul.

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 12: K-9 Handler Testifies Cadaver Dog Detected High Alert of Human Decomposition

June 08, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-anthony-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. -- In day 12 of the death penalty murder trial of Casey Anthony, Orange County K-9 handler Jason Forgey testified that Gerus, a German shepherd cadaver dog certified in 2005, indicated a high alert of human decomposition in the trunk of Anthony's car.  The police dog has had real-world searches numbering “over three thousand by now,” noted Forgey.

Anthony defense lawyer Jose Baez appeared angry as he observed the testimony of Forgey.

Meanwhile, for most of day 12, Anthony attended to two computers whose screens she faced at the defense table.  Whether she was following the proceedings like most of the country — through live feed — or not, she affected disinterest in real-time connecting with witnesses.  

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

 

Find Fred!

Gerus, whose search command was “Find Fred,” was in the back seat of Anthony’s car and was pawing to gain access to the car trunk on July 17, 2008. Forgey said the dog was trained to find blood, bones and human placenta, among other scents.  Signaling on decomposition, Gerus indicated a high alert in the trunk and even jumped into that space.

During one prior search during a non-related case, Gerus, who is not allowed bones as treats, nor ever is given them, found bones 10 days after a CSI team had covered the same area.

Searching the Anthonys' backyard, Gerus signaled in three areas.  But on a search of the property the next day, he did not indicate any place in the backyard.  In the interval between the K-9 team’s initial visit and their return, CSI technicians had disturbed the soil.

Seeking to minimize the dog handler’s testimony, during cross-examination of Forgey, Baez asked how many searches had been videotaped.

“Very few,” said Forgey, who also told the jury that he had smelled decomposition in the car, and had smelled it previously during his career.

“If helicopters had been present, you don’t know if Caylee’s dead body was in the backyard, do you?” Baez asked.

Arguing that the dog’s search records were “heresay,” Baez continued to object throughout Forgey’s testimony, which reportedly was of considerable interest to the jury.

During jury selection, several people chosen said they were dog owners.


Chloroform Detected

The jury also heard testimony from FBI forensic chemist, Dr. Michael Rickenbach, who said he tested items from Anthony’s Pontiac Sunfire for the presence of chloroform, including a spare tire cover constructed of fabric.

Rickenbach indicated he had found traces of the dangerous and volatile substance.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Photo Credit: Red Huber (Orlando Sentinel)


Casey Anthony Trial, Day 12: Jury May Smell Decomposition Odor, Following Groundbreaking Testimony

June 07, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Preeminent Scientist Introduces Jury to Cells, Stages and Chemistry of Decomposition

Casey-anthony-caylee-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. — Some have called it “pungent,” while others consider it noxious, and all who have encountered the odor of a decomposing human body say it’s something they can never forget.  Ever.  

Prosecutors in State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony consider the decompositional odor coming from her car’s trunk as critical evidence.  So, how did a quirky scientist manage to measure and interpret the malodorous substance invisible to the naked eye? 

As a direct result of this novel science, the prosecution could provide unopened cans of air samples for a jury to sniff, creating a potential “O.J. Simpson moment” where an event during a trial becomes pivotal.

Jurors Get OJT in Cellular Biology

In days 11 and 12, Casey Anthony’s trial segued from human witnesses to scientific evidence that the single mom used chloroform to kill her two-year-old daughter, Caylee.  Considering their multiple witnesses’ testimonies on the car’s strong odor, prosecutors needed to sample and test the tell-tale smell in the trunk of her car.  Since they believe Caylee died after being given chloroform — prior to the discovery of chloroform searches on Anthony’s computer — the challenge was to acquire testable samples of the odor from which to measure and interpret data. 

Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

A second, do-able challenge was to give jurors brief, specific background information about decomposition: its four stages, even what happens at the cellular level that could be presented to a jury of non-scientists. 

Shockingly, since unused canned air samples now residing in state’s evidence came from the trunk of the murder defendant’s car, the jury may be asked to smell the decomposition odor from Caylee Anthony’s remains.

The first time Dr. Vass opened a can of air from the trunk of Anthony’s Pontiac Sunfire — in which prosecutors say Caylee’s body was placed around the time of the murder — Vass said the decomposition odor was so strong, he “essentially jumped back.” 

Eventually, Vass identified and quantified the presence of chloroform and that its source was carpet from the car trunk.  Using a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer, chloroform in the carpet registered in parts per million, instead of the anticipated parts per trillion in two control group vehicles.  That’s huge.

In Vass’ main study, in which he used buried cadavers and “triple sorbent trap systems” (three carbon filters in a glass tube) to collect gases given off by a decomposing body, the researcher was able to identify 478 compounds characteristic of human decomposition.

During cross-examination, Jose Baez attempted to “impeach” and otherwise discredit the scientist by questioning him about receiving royalties related to the development of a machine called "Labrador," by Oakridge Laboratories.  Dr. Vass denied the machine’s development was a primary goal in his research.  Using known characteristic compounds of decomposition to measure possible graves, the device aims to take the place of scent dogs in locating buried bodies.  Overall, Baez’s cross-examinations failed to discredit the scientist who was on the stand the entire day.  

In a disclosure that came out midday in court, Judge Perry indicated that Baez had subpoenaed Vass to provide the research “database” of compounds -- something Vass holds as proprietary, related to Labrador, and is unwilling to share with lawyers.  After complaining to the judge, Baez suddenly announced he had withdrawn the subpoena. 

Dowsing Rods, Electronic Leashes on Flies

Just before recess, Baez attempted to introduce a hobby of Dr. Vass’: working with dousing rods.  Traditionally, dowsing rods routinely are used to find a source of water for a well or other use.  The court however was having none of the discrediting testimony and adjourned for the day at 4:30 p.m., concluding the day's testimony with ground-breaking court proceedings.

Dr. Arpad Vass -- who under further cross-examination disclosed he is a forensic anthropologist and not a biochemist -- good-naturedly laughed when Baez inquired, “You also have attempted to put electronic leashes on flies, have you not?”

The prosecution objected to the question; Judge Perry sustained the objection, and Dr. Vass did not answer.

Related Links:

 Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

 

Aphrodite Jones Reports: On Casey Anthony's 'Coldness and Psychotic Mind'

June 06, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.  Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports This morning has been difficult to sit through -- at least for me. The expert witness from the Oakridge National Lab has been testifying about the levels of smell regarding human decomposition -- having conducted experiments on human bodies -- dead bodies that have been donated to science for this purpose. As Dr. Vass testified about the organic and inorganic elements associated with human decomposition -- specifically the chloroform levels found in the air sample collected from Casey Anthony's trunk --  he called the level of chloroform he found from the air sample "shocking."

In my view, this amounts to a concrete corroboration of the allegation that Caylee was indeed, decomposing in the trunk of her mother's car.  What is most disturbing to me, as I sit here listening to the experiments that this expert has conducted on rotting bodies, buried bodies, surface bodies and bodies left in a "control car" held at the Oakridge Lab -- is, not that it is a necessary science lesson for the jury -- but somehow it seems to interest Casey as a lesson in science as well.  Huh? 

While the expert testifies about the odor of a dead body he recognizes, that came from the air sample taken from Casey's trunk, this young woman can actually sit stone-faced, or at times, appear interested in the scientific analysis of the air inside her car trunk -- completely removed from the idea that this evidence pertains to her own baby rotting in her own car. This speaks volumes about her coldness, and her psychotic mind, IMO.

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 9: Defense Fails to Quash Telling Videos

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-anthony-trial ORLANDO, Fla. — Renewed defense objections on June 3 failed to quash more jailhouse videos of Casey Anthony in character-defining footage depicting the 25-year-old first-degree murder defendant during visits with her parents. 

The videos offer stunning examples of Casey Anthony’s untruthfulness and fabrications. 

“I Don’t Have Anything.”

At one point in the tapes, where Casey Anthony — who knows her daughter is dead and lying in woods near her house — tells her mother, Cindy that “I’m sorry, Mom.  I don’t have anything,” on possible places to look for Caylee, missing for more than a month at that time.

“The Best Father”

In some of the most dramatic and potentially-damning recorded conversations, Casey Anthony lovingly tells her dad that, “You’re the best father and by far the best grandfather I’ve ever met.”

Something’s wrong here.  In the first few moments of his opening remarks on day one of the trial, defense lawyer Jose Baez proffered that his client is the victim of her father’s sexual abuse, and in graphic language that may backfire and steer the case toward the prosecution, Baez described a sex act that supposedly was a regular occurrence between father and daughter when Casey was eight.

Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

“Abuse Excuse”

While Baez could put on experts to help him explain Casey’s high praise of her father as relates to the purported abuse, the explanation of his client’s pathological lying — the “abuse excuse” — may not be accepted by the jury. 

Lifetime of Lies

What’s more, should the defense claim that everything his client says is a lie, and, should Casey Anthony be forced to testify on her own behalf -- the testimony conceivably would include her acknowledging a lifetime of lies, yet asking for the jury to accept what she would now be telling as truth.

A poker-faced Casey even trumped herself when she glibly reacted to a rumor related by Cindy that Caylee had drowned in their backyard pool.

“Surprise, surprise,” Anthony offhandedly quipped, moving on in conversation with her parents. 

“I Wanna’ Go Home.”

At the time of that remark, it is unknown if the defense theory of Caylee’s “accidental death” had been adopted.  Had Caylee actually drowned, it is unlikely that Casey Anthony would have remained silent about her daughter’s untimely death that, being an accident, would not have resulted in an arrest.  Badly as she complained about jail and in the video, repeatedly whines, “I wanna’ go home, I just wanna’ go home,” had her daughter drowned, the all-about-me-party girl never would have remained silent.

Special Status in Protective Custody

During the video, a pair of blue latex-gloved hands can be seen adjusting a white, institutional-style privacy screen behind Anthony. The screen’s purpose becomes clear later, when Casey abruptly disappears, leaving Cindy and George wondering where their daughter has gone.  When Casey returns, she explains that, because she has been placed in protective custody, when another inmate is in the room, Anthony must return to her cell.  The screen apparently helps to conceal Anthony’s presence, and is part of Anthony’s special status.

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial: Criminal Hubris - The Lies that Follow Murder

by Kenneth J. Ryan, Ph.D.

Casey-anthony-350x250 When chatting with criminals over the past four decades, nearly all of them have told me that they are extremely bright, genuinely smarter than the police to be sure and almost always willing to share with me exactly how not guilty they are.  Often, these claims follow decades of drug and alcohol abuse, violent family dysfunction and a non-existent record in education.  So, generally speaking, are criminals delusional?  The answer is a resounding maybe.

Criminal hubris is the notion that if one perceives himself or herself as smarter than everyone else, then it is a simple matter of lying to family, friends and the police to cover ones tracks after the commission of a crime.  After all, no one is smart enough to unravel such clever deceit.  And if the first deception is uncovered, another lie will repair everything because none of them will be smart enough to unravel the next such clever deceit; and so on, and so on.  But that’s merely the beginning.

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>


If one perceives himself or herself to be smarter than everyone else, then committing crimes should be easy, whether it’s theft, fraud or murder.  The police will never figure it out, family and friends will never catch on, and the general public (like a jury, for example) will never be convinced.  And if any of these do figure it out, then a clever lie will fix everything since no one is smart enough to unravel such a clever deceit.  And if someone does figures it out, then another lie will fix everything.

Casey Anthony is a liar, this much is abundantly evident.  She lied to family, friends, the police, virtually everyone involved in the investigation into the death of her daughter and one cannot help but wonder about her reasons why. 

The defense alleged that abuses by Anthony’s father and brother are responsible for her conduct; however, the defense has not raised these issues except in opening arguments (a very common defense strategy, opening remarks are not required to be proven).  Furthermore, the defense suggests that Caylee Anthony died in the family swimming pool.  There is a substantial problem with this hypothesis and the problem is that it is asserted by Casey Anthony, a proven liar.

Will Casey Anthony take the witness stand?  Almost certainly not.  The track record of Anthony’s lies is so broad and deep that no jury would recognize the truth from her, even if she told it.  And if Anthony did lie on the witness stand and was caught in it, would she would be angry and not remorseful, and then tell another lie?  Whether or not Anthony’s behavior is a product of criminal hubris is a matter for the jury to decide.  But once again, the notion proffered by the defense that Anthony’s behavior is not on trial is naive.

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

 

Photo Credit: Red Huber (Orlando Sentinel)

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Casey Anthony Stone-Faced to Horrifying Images of Caylee's Decomposing Body

June 04, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones This morning has been brutal in terms of the forensic evidence. An FBI expert is testifying about something called "hair banding" which is a relatively new science -- never brought into a trial as evidence before.

Basically, the FBI expert is explaining to the jury that ONE hair of Caylee's -- recovered from Casey's trunk -- has a characteristic called hair banding (different bands of colors in the hair) which is only known to be consistent with the hair found on decomposing human bodies.  On cross examination, the defense is trying to debunk the "hair banding" present on Caylee's strand of hair as being junk science.

However, with all this banter in the court -- the constant talk about this one strand of Caylee's hair -- that indeed IS consistent with human decomposition -- has become a horrifying focus for the jury. It really is revolting to think about Caylee's decomposing body-- over and over again -- and I must honestly admit that I feel queasy thinking about this beautiful baby rotting in her mother's car.  

And what is Casey's reaction to all this?  Rather than looking sickened or upset -- the woman sits stone-faced and looks hardened by this testimony. To me, this seems surreal -- given that the talk in court should be a reminder to Casey that her poor little Caylee was actually turned into rotting flesh in her Pontiac Sunfire. The whole thing is mortifying.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Casey Anthony Jail Videos Reveal a Monster

June 03, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports Watching the hours of video taped "visits" between the Anthonys and Casey -- has now turned me totally in a different direction. Rather than thinking that it might be possible that George could have found Caylee in the pool-- I realize that George was never a part of finding Caylee and/or the hiding of Caylee's little body, which is what the defense claimed in opening arguments.

All I can think is that Casey sold this pack of lies to her defense team -- and she is so pathological -- and so believable -- her defense team actually bought Casey's twisted story. Geeze -- I wish people could see the jurors faces now -- many of the woman look disgusted by what we're seeing in these jailhouse visits. To think that Casey KNEW her daughter was dead, either by accident or by murder, and for her to allow her parents, her brother, all her family and friends and volunteers from charity organizations -- to spend weeks and months reaching to try to find Caylee -- it just shows her to be a sick and twisted individual.

Moreover, Casey SAYS she doesn't want the media focus on her, but secretly she seems to be enjoying all the attention that she's getting by being on the cover of People Mag, etc. How on earth could this young woman be so cruel -- to allow her mother to get sick over trying to find a missing child -- when Casey knows they'll never find her?  In the jailhouse visits, both her parents plead with Casey to help them follow leads -- and Casey has no leads for them ---- nothing at all. But like the lead investigator said on the taped interview we heard yesterday -- Casey DOES know where Caylee is -- all through the ordeal she's creating. Casey denies any knowledge over and over again -- and her lies get more elaborate -- which is entirely pathological. But she's also showing herself to be narcissistic -- it's evident that secretly, Casey relishes all the support from her family.  And she loves that the world and the media are absorbed in her drama -- it's all about HER -- not about Caylee! When George tells Casey they are hearing from folks all over the U.S. and all over the world -- Casey is pleased ... OMG -- how sickening, really.  I find it hard to look at the girl, here in court, as she lies over and over to George and Cindy -- putting her parents through a living HELL. And, sending the rest of the charities and volunteers for missing children organizations on a wild goose chase.

She IS a monster, in my opinion.

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 9: Watching Casey Watch Herself

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-caylee-anthony-350x250 ORLANDO. Fla. — Casey Anthony occupied the witness stand most of the day.  Really.  Trial-watchers gained a detailed, three-layer perspective of the murder defendant’s ninth trial day during prosecution screenings of the defendant’s jail visits with family.  Hearing hours of Anthony’s intricate lies left no doubt another was unfolding when in a July 28, 2008 visit, she feigned to her brother, Lee, as longing for Caylee’s return, saying, “I miss her, I love her, I want nothing more than for her to come home.”

Heart, Gut and Being

“In my heart, gut and with every ounce of my being,” Anthony adds, “[I feel] that we will be with her again.”

No doubt the first-degree murder defendant, charged with killing her toddler daughter and dumping her body nearby, would not have soon after disclosed, “I’m not doing anything but reading books and napping,” had she envisioned a death-penalty-qualified jury weighing videos of her musings.

Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >> 

Hall of Mirrors

Watching Casey watching herself in the recordings was telling and awful.  Jurors, whose viewer response is decidedly paramount, have video screens in the jury box, located straight across from the defense table, on the first level of newly remodeled Courtroom 23.  In addition to the small screens placed between every other chair in the expansive jury box — also on the first level — a giant screen dominates the room’s right rear wall.  Compelling images on the hypnotic displays created a dizzying array of evidence.   At times head-turning, viewing the day’s screenings was like watching a tennis match.  In the abstract, the polished wood and carpeted courtroom had become a hall of mirrors, where reflections were all visages of Casey Anthony. The “looking-glass” effect was darkly magical. 

Noteworthy Anthony remarks from the screenings:

Casey to George and Cindy, early in the investigation, when her parents asked for suggestions on where the search for Caylee should focus:  Casey relates, “I told Lee to look locally.  It’s not going to hurt to look.  Try the woods.”

“Do you think after this long she’d still be local?” George Anthony wonders.

“She’s not far.  In my heart I know.  I can feel it,” Casey answers.

“Once we get Caylee,” she adds, “we can figure this thing out.”

“The Pinkie is Caylee.”

During one 90-minute visit from Casey’s parents, perhaps the oddest footage occurs when George, holding up his right hand, tells his daughter to “Think of me as a thumb.”

Extending his index finger, Casey’s father says, “the ‘pointer’ is Mom.

“Lee is the middle finger,” George continues.  Nodding to Casey, he proffers his ring finger, saying, “This is you.

“The ‘pinkie’ is Caylee,” George says sadly.

Opening his hand, Casey’s father declares, “This is a family."

“We’re missing two fingers.”

Earlier in the tape, Casey injects her convoluted rationale for past transgressions:

“I would lie, steal, I would do anything to get [Caylee] back."

“I want her to be found whether I am stuck in here or not,” Casey explains.

Cindy says, “[Casey’s former fiancé, Jesse Grund] thinks you guys did something to Caylee.”

“Rotting Body Decomposing Somewhere”

Taken as a whole, the videos and one audio recording of Detective Yuri Melich interrogating Anthony at Universal Studios — where Casey has taken them purportedly to look for Caylee — manifest the most damaging evidence.  Aiming to elicit from her the child’s burial location, Melich tells Casey that her daughter’s   “ ... rotting body is decomposing somewhere.”

Caught in a Dilemma

Seated at the defense table and facing a monitor, an egomaniacal Casey is caught in a dilemma.  She can’t face her own, immense lies, but since the recordings are about her, she is transfixed at the images, unable to shut them out.  Wrinkling her brows and shaking her head, she appears to be thinking, “That’s not the real me!  I had to say that!”

Halfway for the Prosecution

The state’s case-in-chief continues on June 3 at 9 a.m., following an 8:30 a.m. hearing, which likely will be a defense motion objecting to state’s evidence.

Asked to gauge their relative progress, prosecutrix Linda Drane Burdick advised the state was “about halfway” through presentations, after which Casey Anthony’s defense team will put on their case.
Casey Anthony is on trial for first-degree murder in the June 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter. Prosecutors say Anthony, 25, suffocated the girl with duct tape.  The state is seeking the death penalty.

 

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Casey Anthony's Family React Oddly to Tragedy

June 01, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reportsAfter watching the gut wrenching testimony yesterday -- where Cindy relived the day she learned Caylee was missing -- the day she called 911 about smelling "a dead body in the car" that Cindy now claims was just a "figure of speech" -- it was startling to see the testimony from her son, Lee, this morning, who seemed like a hostile witness.

Certainly, the sexual allegations leveled against Lee by Casey and the defense would be enough to make him angry about having to be dragged into court. Still -- his sister's life is on the line here -- yet Lee -- from what I can tell -- doesn't seem to care about Casey, at this point.

For one thing, Lee has been painted as a predator ... For another, Lee was not in that much contact with Casey or Cindy at the time Caylee was missing -- he seemed to be busy with his own life and was not paying attention to the family drama that was going on at the Anthony home. What was strange about his testimony today was that Lee couldn't really recall the details of what happened the day Cindy called 911 about the smell in Casey's car. Was he being evasive?   I'm not sure. Lee did remember that he was there at his parent's house -- along with George, Cindy and Casey -- and told the jury that on that night, Casey did whisper and admit to him that Caylee had been "missing" for over a month. Casey told Lee her baby was kidnapped by a Nanny and Lee went into "finding Caylee mode." Lee told jurors that upon learning this, Cindy was very upset, that he was also upset, that Casey was crying at one point -- but then Casey got quiet. 

However an odd thing to me, was Lee's testimony that his dad,George, upon hearing the news that his granddaughter had been kidnapped for the first time -- upon hearing that Caylee had been "missing" for about a month -- remained calm and quiet in his demeanor. Even more odd, this quiet demeanor of George was also testified to by one of the first responding officers at the scene on July 15, 2008, at the home of the Anthonys.  It doesn't make sense, does it?

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Casey Anthony Sheds a Tear

May 31, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reports Cindy's testimony about finding Caylee's favorite baby doll in Caylee's child car seat -- a doll which she cleaned off with sanitary wipes and also sprayed with Febreeze in order to try to remove the death smell from it --  gave me a pit in my stomach.  

I noticed, as Cindy struggled to compose herself, that one juror held his hand over his mouth ... Other female jurors were looking sad and horrified.

However, throughout the emotional testimony by Cindy, Casey sat motionless, for the most part. But then a photo of Caylee's backpack was introduced into evidence -- a pink and purple cloth bag, filled with girly clothes and other items, a tear came down Casey's face.

The whole situation is heartbreaking -- there's no other way to say it.

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 5: The Redemption of Cindy Anthony

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-anthony-trial ORLANDO, Fla. — What’s right with this picture?  Moments after commencing sworn testimony in the murder trial of her daughter, it was clear the old Cindy Anthony was gone, and in her place was a person no longer using denial to escape the awful realities that had brought her to district court.  Gone was the old Cindy, the Cindy Anthony of 3,150 YouTube listings, who had been mocked, heckled and pursued by the public, for failing to grasp what was painfully clear to most others, after her granddaughter, Caylee, went missing.  What or who is responsible for enlightening the mother of Casey Anthony and the grandmother of Caylee, who police believe died on June 16? 

Under questioning by prosecutor Linda Drane-Burdick, Cindy disclosed she only had stopped looking for Zanny the Nanny — the non-existent person Casey Anthony claimed had kidnapped Caylee — six weeks earlier.

The Perils of Cindy

Even before her granddaughter disappeared on June 16, 2008, Cindy Anthony had faced many perils.  Leaving Ohio in 1989 to seek a better economic life, Cindy and George Anthony found jobs in Orlando, and seemed to be pursuing the American dream, albeit modestly.

Who knows if Cindy, in a good job as a supervisory nurse for Gentiva Health since 2001, had become too busy to notice any “soft signs” that her daughter might have issues, until a significant lie — the one Casey told about getting her high school diploma — shocked the principal — and the Anthonys.

Reportedly, Cindy alone confronted Casey, being careful not to increase “volatility” that existed between her husband and daughter.  It seems possible that the fracturing of the Anthony family may have begun in earnest that spring in 2004.  A pattern of dysfunction started: Casey’s behavior x, y or z dispatches Cindy the Rescuer, the problem-solver or mediator.

 Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

“Professional Help”

Speculation notwithstanding, the psychopathology of Casey Anthony would likely elicit more than one Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV) diagnosis.  Casey’s graduation episode past, a school friend who also worked at Universal Studios suspected something about Casey was amiss; in Diane Fanning’s Mommy’s Little Girl, Casey’s childhood friend, Kiomarie Torres, tells Casey to get “professional help.”

Hollow-point Bullets

Money, marriage and family issues kept Cindy in constantly-building stress.  Through it all, Casey Anthony’s lies had rained like hollow-point bullets, shot from a telescope firearm, all but destroying the hapless woman’s mind.  Depression followed.  And then came Caylee.

Her granddaughter, Caylee Marie, was the brightest part of Cindy’s life and the reality of her death was too traumatic to comprehend.  How could anything bad have happened to Caylee, when such obvious love and attention went into the child’s care?

Culture of Disappeared and Murdered Children

Cindy Anthony’s life was a public one. When not making a media appearance, Cindy Anthony took shelter in the culture of disappeared and murdered children.  Common to these philanthropic groups are various events, including balloon-releases, candle-lightings, parades and vigils — all fitting memorials for victims’ families to embrace.

Dress Rehearsal for Trial

After three years and with her daughter’s trial approaching, Cindy Anthony likely had to answer scores or even hundreds of questions during depositions.  By all accounts, Cindy’s pre-trial testimony was a dress rehearsal for her daughter’s first-degree murder trial. 

“Cynthia Anthony!” A bailiff was poised to escort her to the stand.  Carrying a bottle of water, Cindy made her way through the courtroom, walking toward the witness box.  The long walk provided time for a final exercise in reality testing.  Caylee was dead, and nothing could bring her back.  This time, Cindy would have to rely on others to make things right.

As Good a Time as Any

By the time a photograph of Caylee’s bed was projected on the courtroom’s big screen, the new Cindy had materialized.   Gone: sarcasm, animosity, anger and excuses -- behaviors which now found refuge with the defense.

It was as good a time as any for redemption; Cindy Anthony was about to state her name.

 

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 4: ‘Perfuming’ the Smell of Death

May 30, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.
—Friedrich Nietzsche

Casey-anthony-caylee-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. — Prosecutors and the defense in Casey Anthony’s murder trial hit high marks for witness credibility during their fourth day in court, when a panoply of characters provided mostly favorable looks at Casey before her arrest.   Testimony from an additional witness laid a credible foundation for forthcoming scientific testimony concerning air sample tests from Anthony’s car trunk: source of the decomposition smell.  Which side presented the most effective testimony?

The “Mallory Effect”

The day was a draw, but an intriguing and convoluted one.  Certain testimony artfully dodged, even ignored the defendant’s checkered past.  In what we’ll call the “Mallory Effect,” an unassuming witness championed Casey Anthony’s maternal abilities, demonstrating the power to orchestrate her own sobbing and that of the defendant’s.

From the day’s first witness, Mallory Parker, came a bouquet of kind assertions concerning Casey and Caylee Anthony’s relationship, which the woman deemed “amazing.”  Parker, 27, is the fiancée of Casey Anthony’s brother, Lee. 

Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

“A Flower in the Attic”

This was strange testimony coming from an Anthony family intimate.  While Mallory Parker’s opinion may be what she knows, and only that, her fiancé stands accused, along with his father, George, by the defense, which benefits from her testimony, of sexually abusing the defendant. 

The so-called “abuse excuse” is Jose Baez’s defense theory for Casey’s secreting Caylee’s body, “like a flower in the attic,” after the toddler’s “accidental drowning.”   The irrational rationale is that being abused, Casey was taught to keep secrets, including the “secret” of her daughter’s accidental death. 
Parker — a long-suffering Anthony supporter since she began dating Lee — sobbed as she spoke the names, “Casey and Caylee.”  After today, defense lawyer Baez, who often toys with emotions of those he is questioning, can rely on “the Mallory effect” as a useful tool in plying jurors susceptible to witness stand crying.

A parade of Casey’s mostly twenty-something friends — her old buds, lovers, and BFFs — said nice things about the first-degree murder defendant.  Several people — including a roster of former lovers — denied during Baez’s questioning that the single mom ever struck, punished or tortured Caylee. 

“Special Bond”

What’s more, not only was Casey and Caylee’s mother-daughter relationship “amazing,” but also, “they had a special bond,” Parker added.

Does an “amazing” mother expose her toddler to an almost-vagabond life, spending nights with this and that boyfriend?  While Mallory Parker’s opinion may be what she knows, and only that, her fiancé, Lee Anthony, stands accused, along with his father, George, of sexually abusing the defendant. 
Parker and Simon Birch, unknown until summoned by the state of Florida to testify in the capital case, likely shocked the jury with their two disparate testimonies.

By Casey Anthony’s standards, Mallory Parker, 27, does not seem a person that normally would hang out, even in her previous life, with the woman on trial for killing her daughter.  In the witness box, Casey’s future sister-in-law, a customer service representative employed locally, was missing the usual Casey smoky-eye makeup and plunging necklines.

Perhaps the simply-dressed, pensive young woman inspired authenticity; the message and the messenger were one.

Another “messenger,” who conveyed information about the smell of death that so permeates the case, was Simon Birch, the Johnson’s Wrecker Service tow yard manager that processed Casey’s car, waited on the Anthony's, and attested to the abandoned vehicle’s decomposition odor.

Decomp and the Brit

The fashionably-disheveled man, whose slightly thinning, curly hair and British accent lent an air of authority, had smelled decomposition in several towed vehicles.   Birch also testified about the plastic garbage bag that he and Anthony inspected in their search to find the source of decomposition odor.

Simon Birch — ironically the title of the movie adaptation of John Irving’s redemption novel, A Prayer for Owen Meany — could effectively narrate any recounting of this trial.  Meanwhile, spinning on its own axis, in all its complexity, The World According to Casey Anthony arcs over the horizon, tracked by case followers.

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial, Day 4: The Courting of George Anthony

May 27, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

“Show me a little respect and I’ll show you a little, too.”
- George Anthony on the witness stand, May 26, 2011, to defense attorney Jose Baez 

ORLANDO, Fla. -- It’s a dirty, dirty job, but somebody has to do it — or do they?  Murder defendant, Casey Anthony’s father, George endured a grilling to the point of harassment on the witness stand for much of day three during the death penalty trial of  Florida vs. Casey Anthony.  What so angered the defendant’s father?

The Smiling Inquisitor

Casey-anthony-350x250At times smiling and appearing friendly, a crocodilian Jose Baez seemed more predator than sworn officer of the court.  Although George’s own lawyer and friend, Mark Lippman, had prepared his client for the merciless questioning anticipated, the defendant’s father found himself on the defensive most of the time.

It was merely the third day in the death penalty trial of a young woman who reportedly lied to too many, seemingly had many boyfriends and often, according to a considerable folio of state’s evidence photographs, had one too many drinks.  As the long confrontation evolved, George Anthony’s anger coursed from his reddening complexion and could be traced, muscle by muscle, across his face.  In one of many courtroom moves to distance, even acquit his client of all her alleged transgressions, Baez pushed George to the edge of composure, bullying the defendant’s father and victim’s grandfather to assert himself, to somehow get out from under Baez’s vicious cross-examination.   

George Anthony, pivotal witness

“Sir, you are badgering me!”  Anthony declared, as Baez peppered his client’s already-exasperated father with questions about crucial dates, gas cans and the presence of duct tape, around the time of his granddaughter’s disappearance from their modest, single-story home.

George Anthony, surely the most pivotal witness for both prosecution and the defense, had been instructed by Baez,  until that interchange, to scramble on and off the witness stand for the purpose of marking key dates on two blown-up June and July, 2008 calendars occupying considerable space before the witness stand, and facing the jury.

“Running on fumes!”

Struggling under his cross-examination, Anthony added, “my wife and I were running on fumes” during the early days after their granddaughter’s Caylee’s disappearance.

Finally, Anthony beseeched, “You treat me with a little respect and I’ll give you a little respect.”

“Did you ever see Caylee again?’’ Baez inquired of George.

“No, sir,” Anthony replied.

“Have you ever sexually molested your daughter?” Baez queried the obviously-distressed man.

“No,” said Anthony, tensing his mouth, closing his eyes and looking down.

“Were you present in the home the day Caylee died?”

And, “Did you … dispose of the body of your granddaughter … did you obtain duct tape and place duct tape on the gas can?”  By now dispirited, but with his remaining energy, Anthony fended off the questions.

Interpretation:  Clearly, Baez attempted to increasingly anger the habitually short-tempered George Anthony, and to plant seeds of doubt around the man who, along with defendant Casey Anthony, was the last person to see Caylee Anthony alive on June 16.   

Should Baez succeed in causing the toddler’s grandfather to lose composure while testifying, such behavior could be construed negatively by a jury whose members include teachers, a mental health counselor, nurses and numerous parents — most who act as caregivers. 

Baez vs. Anthony

The target of Baez’s opening remarks, in which the defense lawyer claimed that George forced Casey to perform oral sex in mornings before eight-year-old Casey went to school, George Anthony fended off Baez’s continued attacks, necessitating several sidebars.  From the bench, Judge Perry ordered the persistent Baez to “move on.”

“Did you tell law enforcement about the gas cans?”

With an audibly impatient voice, Judge Perry warned, “Mistah’ Baez, do not go there.

Eventually, Anthony felt pressured enough to say, “You’re going off on ways to get me upset,”

George Anthony had reached his limit.  Too soon in a death penalty trial for the withering cross-examination, pitting a father against the lawyer who long ago downplayed his below-belt legal tactics as “ruffling a few feathers” in the process, the trial of the century appears, at times, to be Baez vs. (George) Anthony, and not State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony.  

 

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Aphrodite Jones Reports: Only Time, and Witnesses, Will Tell

May 26, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.   Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-jones-reportsYesterday was a heavy day, starting with the media "confrontation" with Jose Baez on the courthouse steps and ending with the strained testimony of Casey's former boyfriend, Tony Lazzaro.

As I approached the courtroom on the 23rd floor yesterday morning, I ran into George and Cindy Anthony in the hallway, waiting to be seated in court. They looked sullen, very sad and kind of beaten down. Who could blame them, after the accusations leveled against George Anthony by the defense team in opening arguments. If, and that's a huge if, George did help cover up Caylee Anthony's death -- and furthermore -- if, another big if, he molested Casey in any way when she was a child -- well, this case will take more twists and turns than a Disney roller coaster. 

IF the allegations against the Anthony family (both George and Lee have been accused of being sexually inappropriate with Casey) have even a grain of truth to them -- the jury will surely consider the defense's theory that Casey was out partying "as though nothing happened" because she grew up, having learned to live in a dream world, separating her horrible home life from reality by playing and smiling and pretending that she was a happy-go-lucky girl. Only time, and witnesses, will tell.

Casey Anthony Prosecution, Defense Exhibits Worlds Apart

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Day two in capital murder trial of Orlando mom accused of killing her toddler daughter

Casey-caylee-anthony-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. — In the sensational Florida first-degree murder case, where a little girl was killed and her mother could face lethal injection for the crime, opposing legal teams are harnessing markedly different exhibit styles to illumine their respective cases.  On day two of Casey Anthony’s death penalty trial, riveting testimony from Casey Anthony’s ex-boyfriend, Tony Lazzaro came before the jury and shocked trial-watchers.   Though Lazzaro’s remarks are pivotal — he was the last person to spend time with Anthony around the time Caylee, 2, disappeared on June 16 — of equal importance is how the information is presented to the jury.  Should “show and tell” matter, and if so, why?    

Once upon a time in Ohio

From the first minutes of both sides’ May 24 opening remarks, the state’s Linda Drane Burdick presented a linear, day-by-day narrative to develop Casey Anthony’s role in daughter, Caylee’s 2008 murder.  The narrative began Aug. 9, 2008, and ended with a forensics overview of the murder weapon: three lengths of Henkel brand duct tape.  Using cell phone records, Burdick tracked events and principals’ locations the weeks before Caylee vanished; provided as background information on the Anthony family dysfunction, earlier, the blond-haired, red-jacketed prosecutrix traced the Anthony family’s Ohio origins, and their move to Florida.

On day two of the trial, as part of the state’s direct examinations, key witnesses identified themselves in Casey Anthony’s “party photos,”during prosecutor Frank George’s questioning. Lazzaro, Clint House and others in Anthony’s clique confirmed their likenesses in various pictures by marking directly on a video display screen, that when published, also appeared on a larger screen in front of the jury. 
No more the province of ESPN and Weather Channel presenters, interactive screen graphics allow attorneys and witnesses to write at will on currently projected information, where evidence photographs draw the jury’s interests, and hopefully, are considered during deliberation.   Such electronic imaging equipment soon will be standard components of courtroom and trial displays. 

Follow the Timeline of Events in the Casey Anthony Case >>

Refrigerator art?

Presently, the Anthony defense is harnessing analog or traditional imaging.  The officious snap! of magnetized photos and graphics, placed on oversized display boards and reminiscent of refrigerator magnet “art,” helped illustrate Jose Baez’s remarks, as the lead defense counsel narrated the story of Caylee’s “swimming pool accident.”

Telling Casey Anthony’s story, while adding data, information, schematics, etc., to magnetic boards and presenting concept-building “chalk talk” with markers on white boards, Baez began: 

“Come with me ...“

“Come with me to 4937 Hopespring Drive.  Looks like the all-American home.  You never know,” he added, snapping onto the board more representative graphics of the Anthony house, “what’s going on.”
Attempting to “grandfather in” a photograph of his client during a prosecution witness cross-examination, Baez scuttled from defense table to sidebar and back again, clutching the enlarged picture to his chest — ostensibly to protect it from view — after the judge disallowed it into evidence at that time. 

Recipe for disaster?   Baez & Company cooked up “Spaghetti Defense”

After witnessing their adversary in awkward moments, were Orange County prosecutors feeling smug after updating their courtroom presentations?  When not in use beside the state’s digital display system, complete with technician, Mr. Baez’s immense boards cluttered the courtroom — as did the numerous ingredients of his “spaghetti defense,” or, throw several things at a wall and see what sticks.

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial: Why Mothers Kill

May 25, 2011

By Kenneth J Ryan, Ph.D.

Casey-anthony-350x250 In understanding why mothers kill, it helps to look from a few perspectives at the reasons why anyone kills.  These reasons are called motives in law, and they date back to the dawn of time.  Greed, lust, power, control, pleasure, revenge or any combination of these are all reasons that people kill.  Depression, often cited by mothers who kill, is not included among these; not exactly, that is.

Psychosis can be a motive as well as a defense and is a psychiatric term defined in law.  A psychotic experience is, “generally a loss of touch with reality,” according to Black’s Law Dictionary, which toes in nicely with the legal concept of insanity that shares the same definition.  But depression is rarely a psychotic event and more Americans suffer from it than any other psychiatric malady.  If one is to plead “not guilty by reason of insanity” because of depression, it is an uphill battle indeed.  Being unhappy isn’t a sufficient reason to murder anyone, there must be more to it.

Nevertheless, one who follows these cases with some interest will surely note a “hearing voices” and depression defense mounted from time to time, used successfully in the Andrea Yates trial, for example.  And even if it doesn’t work well, it works often enough to expect it now and then.  The Casey Anthony trial is somewhat unusual since there may be a real argument that the defendant is a psychotic; but apparently Anthony didn’t hear any voices.  Now the defense is saying that before Casey Anthony went into the night to party, Caylee Anthony drowned.  Thereafter, Casey felt depressed about it for awhile, but not bad enough to call an ambulance or notify the police.  Instead, the child’s head was wrapped in duct tape and buried in the woods.  Frankly, that’s a little crazy from where I sit; however, the defense must anticipate that a Florida jury will be less moved to find Anthony’s conduct legally insane. 

With the burden of proof of guilt on the prosecution, it is a brazen move by the defense to admit in front of a jury that the defendant was present with the victim, her own child, at the time of death or a party to concealing the death thereafter.  The trial is not about Casey Anthony’s bizarre conduct, says the defense.  But it is, and surely the jury must know this.  Was Casey Anthony’s conduct that of someone emotionally crushed by the death of her child or instead was it that of someone who had gotten exactly what she wanted by her own hands?  The jury will decide in time, to be sure.

Meanwhile, if one is watching for details coming from Colorado regarding the death of two children allegedly at the hands of their mother, listen for the appearance of voices in the defense.

Photo Credit: Red Huber (Orlando Sentinel)

Related Links:

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case

Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

Casey Anthony Trial, Juror Profiles: What Do We Know About the Casey Anthony Jury?

May 23, 2011

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

"In order to have life we must lose our old lives, so that we may be reborn."
- Casey Anthony while incarcerated, in a letter to Robyn Adams

 

Casey-anthony-caylee-350x250 ORLANDO, Fla. — In order to “have life,” Casey Anthony must “lose” her “old life.”  Can Anthony’s cadre of defense lawyers save her from being executed by lethal injection in Florida’s death chamber?

In order to be “reborn,” as her letter to inmate Robyn Adams expresses, Anthony’s attorneys must explain considerable evidence strongly supporting the 25-year-old’s capital punishment charge for killing her daughter, Caylee, 2, in 2008, then dumping her daughter’s body in woods near the house they shared with Anthony’s parents, George and Cindy Anthony. 

Three-plus years in arriving, after a trial expected to take six to eight weeks, the verdict cannot come soon enough for case followers.  On May 24, 12 jurors and five alternates from Pinellas County, Florida, will hear testimony to give — or deny — the young woman her life.   Here’s what we know about Casey Anthony’s jury:

Juror 1The Counselor:  White, female, age 65, married, two children.   Retired nurse and volunteer counselor.  Death penalty stance: “I value life.   I also value the criminal justice system.”  Has smelled decomposing bodies.  Capable of understanding, relating to others the scientific evidence in trial, her communication skills and education qualify her as a strong candidate for jury foreperson.

Juror 2The IT Worker: Black male, mid-thirties, married, two children: a daughter, 4 and son, 9.   Like defendant, Casey Anthony, juror’s mother was a single mom.  “My impression was that, ‘yes, I thought she did it.’ ... If I had to return a verdict, I would say ‘not guilty’ right now.”  Death penalty stance:  Does not believe in the death penalty.  “God is the one that makes the final judgment.”

Juror 3The Weaver:  White, female, age 32, single, youngest of five children.  Nursing student, St. Petersburg College.  Crafty:  Hobby is weaving; works in fiber and is a member of a weavers’ guild.   Her pet dog is a rat terrier.  Said she has little knowledge of and is not following the case.  “I know my ignorance works in my favor at this point!”  Admitted she wanted to be on the jury.  On a scale of 1 to 10, she rates the death penalty at “a three or a five.” 

Juror 4 The Church Lady:  Black female, 40s, no children, lives alone. Unknown occupation.  Plays “Farmville” on Facebook.  “Most of the time, I play my computer games”  she notes. Quiet, unassuming, does not like to judge people by what other people say about them.  

Juror 5The Retired Nurse’s Aid: White, female, late 50s, three children.  Has 11th grade education.  Had a driving under the influence arrest in 1998.  Lives with boyfriend, a retired plumber.  Was a juror for a criminal trial case.   Does not own a computer.  Works in yard, goes to gym.  Death penalty stance:  “I guess I believe in the death penalty.  I’d have to know a lot of facts before I really considered it.”

Juror 6The Chef:  White male, 33, married, two children, ages 6 and 21 months.  Sells restaurant equipment and is in Orlando on business once a week.  Has University of Florida business degree and owns a cat.  Did not want to be on the jury.  Could vote for the death penalty; “If the law dictated it, I would be able to follow it.”

Juror 7The Lawyer’s Daughter:  White female, 41, divorced with no children.  Once a victim of home invasion, but physically uninjured.  Works as administrative assistance in juvenile justice welfare.  She has limited knowledge of the case, maintaining that she could vote to recommend the death penalty.  “It would be — gosh — a solemn decision, but it is an option under the law.”

Juror 8Verizon Service Representative:  White, female, 50s, married, two sons approximately Casey Anthony’s age (mid-twenties).  Father worked in law enforcement.  She would have no problem with the death penalty if warranted, provided she had heard “all the facts.”

Juror 9The Logger:  White male, 53, never married.  Semi-retired; moved to Florida 4 years ago from Indiana because he was “sick of snow.”  The caregiver for a stroke sufferer; he also does odd jobs.  Watches PBS and the History Channel.  He believes Casey Anthony’s “whole story” has not come out; holds no bias, supports the death penalty, and could vote to recommend it “in the proper situation.” 

Juror 10Verizon Retention Specialist:   White male, 57, never married, no children.  When asked what he knows about the case, he said, “I really don’t know any details ...” and that he does believe “... everyone is innocent until proven guilty.”  Disclosed that his sister and her boyfriend committed a violent crime against their father.  He regards the death penalty as a “necessary option.”

Juror 11The Teacher:  White male, 30s, unmarried.  A high school physical education and health teacher who believes Casey Anthony is guilty, who also relates the opinion in the teachers’ lounge is that Casey is guilty.   In his profession as an educator, says he “had to learn to listen to differing opinions,” and could put aside his leanings in order to fairly judge Casey Anthony.  States the death penalty is a “necessary option.”

Juror 12The Publix Cook:  White female, 60s, married to Publix supermarket employee, two children and one young grandchild.  Has very little knowledge of the case, although she initially followed it.  No cable TV; “not that into” newspapers or TV.  She does not own a computer.  Rating the death penalty as ten on a scale of one to ten, she would have no problem deciding on LWOP (Life without Opportunity for Parole) or the death penalty.  

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz >>

Alternate Jurors

Alternate Juror 1The Executive:  White, female, 48, divorced, has 5-year-old daughter.  A project sponsor for an information technology company, she oversees computer software implementation.  Watches more TV sports than news.

Alternate Juror 2The High School Government Teacher:  White male, 50s, third marriage, currently to elementary school teacher; has grown son and two step-children.  Had prior job in U.S. Postal Dept. labor relations.  Has a prior driving under the influence charge that was reduced to reckless driving.  Hobbies include reading spy novels; likes author David Baldacci.

Alternate Juror 3The Widow:  White female, age 37, has a 12-year-old son. Was married to a man jailed on drug charges; husband died during incarceration.  She works as a car dealership cashier, lives with her parents, and says serving on a jury would present an “emotional hardship.”

Alternate Juror 4The Carpenter:  White male, 25, single.  The former daycare teacher now works as a carpenter and lives with his parents.  He has a juvenile conviction for drug and paraphernalia possession, for which he served probation.

Alternate Juror 5 The Water Reclamation Plant Operator:  White, 39, married, no children.  Former Coast Guard mechanic/military policeman.  Has some knowledge of the case, which was “not big news in my circle.”  Prior to receiving a jury duty summons, planned on taking grandmother to a ball game.  He plays computer games.  Described a YouTube parody about Casey Anthony by syndicated radio personality, “Bubba the Love Sponge.”  Recalls odor in Anthony’s car trunk that was attributed initially to pizza.  Says, “I don’t like to judge people on what other people say.”

_____________________________________________________________________________
 

The televised death penalty trial of Casey Anthony begins May 24, 2011, at 9 a.m. in the Orange County Courthouse, Orlando, Fla.

 

Related Links:
Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

 

Aphrodite Jones Reports: From the Casey Anthony Trial Courtroom

May 20, 2011

[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective as she attends the Casey Anthony Trial. Check in for her regular reports.  Read her Bio >> ]

Aphrodite-bio After almost two weeks of jury selection, today is the day that Judge Perry plans to swear in the Casey Anthony jury. The selection, having been moved to Clearwater, Fla., has been an intense process for everyone sitting in the courtroom ... yet Miss Anthony, oddly, has seemed so entirely composed throughout. That all changed, however, this morning, when a spectator, watching a potential juror being questioned about the death penalty ... suddenly burst out: "She killed someone, anyway!" The woman, Elizabeth Ann Rogers, was lead out of the courtroom, and was brought back in, hyperventilating, hysterically crying, to stand before Judge Belvin Perry to show "cause" as to why she should not be held in contempt of court.

The spectator explained that she was "mentally ill," being diagnosed as bi-polar and borderline personality disorder, and while she apologized to the court and asked not to be punished, Judge Perry explained that her outburst caused the potential loss of a juror, and he found the woman in Contempt. Ms. Rogers could have been sentenced to serve as much as 179 days in jail ... but because of her disability, Judge Perry sentenced her to serve 2 days in the Pinellas County jail. It was an outrageous scene ... and Casey seemed unnerved by it ... as did everyone else.

What was striking about this "mini event," was the fact that Ms. Rogers, a curious bystander who wandered into the court, showed more emotion in the few minutes she stood before Judge Perry, than I have yet to see from Casey Anthony herself.

Geeze ... you'd think this lady (Ms. Rogers) was on trial herself ... the way she cried and carried on in front of the judge.

It was eerie to watch a spectator being led away by deputies, hysterical and trying to catch her breath ... And ... at least, for me, it brought home the true gravity of the situation that Miss Casey Anthony is facing ...

I wondered ... as Casey watched the poor woman being lead out the door ... Does she realize that a day may come when SHE will be lead out of the courtroom in handcuffs, never to return to civilian life again? Of course, perhaps Casey Anthony tries not to think about that ... But if it were me, that would be the ONLY thing I could think about.

The other day, this past Tuesday, I was in the Pinellas County courtroom sitting right behind Casey, and I stared at this young woman for hours ... trying to get a sense of her guilt or innocence ... but ... honestly, I could not read her. To me, Casey looked like a scared little girl, who, by now, is used to ignoring the media ... and used to keeping herself straight-faced and resolute. As close as I was to her, and, as much as I tried to catch her attention, Casey never turned to look my way. It was like she was a statue. ... Instead of turning her head one iota, I saw Casey give a cold stare pointed toward the judge for the 5 hours I was there ... and then, at one point, I finally noticed that Casey glanced at me once or twice from the corner of her eye ... but that was it.

My impression of Casey Anthony is that she seems to be in a surreal state -- as though she was watching a movie about her life, rather than actually being on trial for her life ... Of course, it's natural for the process to seem surreal for her ... especially when she must listen to prospective jurors talking about her presumed innocence ... her potential guilt ... and also, about whether or not any given juror could impose the death penalty upon her. It was heavy for me ... just sitting there contemplating the lethal injection ... and contemplating the theory of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," which is NOT the way jurors are supposed to think ... but ...

We all know that "An Eye for an Eye" has been one form of a "resolution" for folks, ever since Biblical times ...

And as I left the courtroom that day, I wondered ... How many of us would not want to take an eye for an eye?
What if my baby was killed? What if my husband was killed?
Could I be so generous? Could I let the murderer live?
It's very hard to say ...

 

Related Links:
How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case
Casey Anthony: Mom or Murderer

 

Casey Anthony Trial: Seating Jury Brings Strong Emotions, Day 10

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Casey-caylee-anthony-350x250 CLEARWATER, Fla. — If Judge Belvin Perry keeps to schedule, 12 jurors about to be sworn will take Florida’s Oath of Trial Jurors on May 20 and a number of alternates will join them so that opening statements will commence in Orlando on Monday, May 23.   As this jury is about to be seated, why is there such collective and individual relief?  Why so much emotion?

“Trial of the century?”

Beyond well-publicized reasons why the Casey Anthony murder trial has achieved “trial of the century” status — quite possibly the best explanation being that two-year-old Caylee Anthony’s unspeakable killing triggers visceral, child-protective responses — whatever verdict is reached may not deliver relief to all.  

Listen to Casey Anthony Recorded Messages, 911 Calls and More >>

“Cloaked in innocence”

Given the allegations, “cloaked in innocence,” as Jose Baez reminds, still, the trial of a wayward young mother that lied to and tyrannized her impotent parents, George and Cindy Anthony, spotlights her soul, if one exists. Without the resolve to trust in the U.S. jury system, any verdict but the one I would order threatens to inoculate society with frustration, negativism and a sense of powerlessness.  The trial of O.J. Simpson is a searing example of such bitterness. 

In  State of Florida vs. Casey Marie Anthony, attorneys likely will present the case as a perfect storm for filicide or, when a parent kills their child.   No matter the long and tiresome list of mitigating factors that the Anthony defense links to their concept of mercy.*  So long, in fact, that when the defense team’s mitigation specialist Ann Finnell reads the compendium to potential jurors, given her monotonal, soporific voice, people needed caffeine and fresh air to clear the mind and perish the thought(s).

Initially wrapped in a shroud of plastic, Caylee’s body, scientists and technicians say, was secreted in a car trunk, then placed in a wood near her first and only home.  When utility worker Roy Kronk visited Suburban Drive and found a skull protruding from a canvas bag, the child’s remains underwent considerable scientific examination.  The skeleton’s duct-taped jaws, including a tell-tale, heart-shaped sticker on the bone, mandated forensic postmortems in the Casey Anthony trial, recalling care taken by Egyptian embalmers: both comprise a province of the few, the learned and the tacitly secret.

Most of us are not scientists.  We do not possess the measures of cool objectivity, of inquisitiveness for its own or purposeful sakes.  Therefore, it might be best, or at least more calming, to step back, to clear the air for 12 individuals who, acting as said individuals, must act as one.  Breathe

Consider the inherent power and majesty of 12 strangers, whose names come from a driver license lottery: citizens that pool intellect, talent and life experiences to relieve posthumously the suffering of a small child and her survivors.   Does the process not take your breath away?

The court room is a crowded place.  It is busy, officious, and more than a mite intimidating. The din and hurry of the place — feet shuffling, paper crinkling and all the fey language each side can muster — create a sort of white noise to fill the black silence of murder no one wants to think about. We don’t, but we must.

The capital trial of Casey Anthony is perhaps the best society can do to rise above more base instincts that arise within us, when we consider elements of the crime, and who might be the most likely offender.

As the jury in State of Florida vs. Casey Marie Anthony prepares to hear the capital case, we are astonished by what is before them.   On Monday and every day of the trial thereafter: observe, learn and regard the tragedy of Caylee as a cautionary tale, where likely an unbroken cycle of parenting gone awry, ever worsening, comes to this

______________________________________________________________________________

* For the defense:  Ann Finnell’s list of mitigating factors

Addressing each potential juror, defense attorney Ann Finnell asked whether they could take into consideration the following:  “... The defendant's age, lack of maturity and impulse control and [sic] history of insomnia and nightmares.”

Attorneys also raised the possibility of a history of sexual abuse.  The mitigation specialist related a list of "mitigating factors, “including  “ ... a lack of parental guidance and protection and parental verbal and emotional abuse. Other factors raised were “... being taught poor coping skills and to project a false appearance by her parents, being used as a decoy or pawn by her parents and being used as a scapegoat for parental misconduct.”


Related Links:

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case

Serial Killer John Wayne Gacy Art Exhibition Under Fire

May 13, 2011

[From the Investigation Discovery Editors]

John-wayne-gacy-300x200 Artwork created by serial killer John Wayne Gacy while on death row is on exhibit and for sale by a Las Vegas gallery, according to CNN. 

Representatives of the gallery said their intent was to host a charity exhibition and sale to benefit the National Center for Victims of Crime. 

However, the victims organization says they never agreed to partner with the gallery on the exhibit.  They have issued a cease-and-desist letter, requesting that the gallery stop use of their name.

What do you think?  Has the gallery gone too far?  Share your thoughts in the Comments section below and let us know how you feel.

Visit the Fearbook and Get More on Gacy >>

Read John Wayne Gacy's Criminal Profile >>


 


More on the Web
CNN, Controversial serial killer's paintings go on display in Las Vegas
ARTINFO, Is It Ethical to Profit From a Serial Killer's Art? Behind the John Wayne Gacy Show Uproar

Casey Anthony: Wife of Serial Killer Joins Casey Anthony Defense

[This article is by contributing writer Ivy Bigbee. She is a Washington, D.C.-based writer.]

Oscar-ray-bolin CLEARWATER, Fla. — Entering through the revolving door of Casey Anthony’s legal team, a woman packing her own notoriety has joined the defense group.  Mitigation specialist Rosalie Bolin, who married serial killer Oscar Ray Bolin via telephone, made her initial court appearance on May 11.  Although her official role has not been identified, Bolin acted as Casey “whisperer” on a difficult day for the defendant.

What could save her from the death penalty?

Suppose Casey Anthony receives a guilty verdict in her capital murder trial.  In the penalty phase, grappling with her possible execution, will a jury make allowances for any number of events and crises people encounter in everyday life, yet who are not charged with killing their child?

Consider Anthony defense attorney Ann Finnell’s extensive list of the numerous issues -- common to many, but when linked to the defendant, could offset her potential execution:

“ . . .  age, lack of maturity, brain development, lack of impulse control, history of sexual abuse, has insomnia and nightmares, lack of parental guidance, mother and father failed to protect her as a child, verbally and emotionally abused as a child, taught poor coping skills, taught to project false appearances, used as a decoy or pawn by parents and a scapegoat for parental misconduct, good conduct in school, above-average grades, sports, loved Caylee and Caylee loved her, good detainee at jail . .   “

On the fourth day of jury selection, Finnell hastily tendered her astonishing list, continuing until Judge Perry advised that the defense could not present case strategy during jury selection.

Introduced to Finnell’s catalog of human behavior, potential jurors and trial watchers likely were shaking their heads over such an assortment.   It may be that in addition to exploring Casey Anthony’s history and background, the defense created its compendium of behaviors to introduce and support reasonable doubt, if and when the decision regarding lethal injection must be determined.  Additionally, since jurors bring their life experiences to the table, different mitigating factors may resonate unevenly among jury members.

Wearing a pale yellow blouse tucked into dark slacks and, for the most part, sitting quietly at the defense table — despite her histrionics the previous day — Anthony appeared more calm and attentive to her surroundings and seemed more aware of the voir dire process.

Juror 1398 was among the group of potential panelists.   The mental health counselor and married mother of two grown children and 3 grandchildren seemed centered, informed and reasonable.  When asked her thoughts on the death penalty, the former nurse, age 68 and white, noted, “I value life.  I also value our criminal justice system, as it has evolved over the years.”  She added, “I do not think it’s necessarily a wrong thing to do.”

Dismissive of the hovering helicopters and “media blitz” surrounding the trial, the composed candidate indicated she “had a life,” and that she viewed the monstrous pre-trial publicity as “background stuff.”

Photo Credit: Florida Dept. of Corrections

Related Links:

How Much Do You Know About the Casey Anthony Case? Take a Quiz.
Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case
Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case

Charlie Sheen's Violent Torpedo Scores Victory in Cleveland

April 06, 2011

Charlie SheenI've been following the Charlie Sheen media blitz for several weeks now and have, at times, thrown my hat into the ring with the occasional article or comment – including this most recent story I did for Investigation Discovery on Most Famous "Bleeps": Charlie Sheen.
When I heard about the Violent Torpedo of Truth tour, it was a no-brainer for me. The reporter in me wanted to go cover the event, while the cynic in me wanted to go watch what I assumed would be a major train wreck.
So, when tickets went on sale for the Cleveland show, I grabbed up a seat in the main dress level and patiently awaited the April 5th show date. I was not surprised when Sheen reportedly bombed in Detroit, Mich. and was booed off the stage, and I nary raised an eyebrow when I read he got a better reception in Chicago – a fluke, I figured.
The Cleveland show took place yesterday at the 3,200-seat State Theatre. Surprisingly, the event sold out just prior to the show, although there was more than one scalper on the street offering tickets and second-rate T-shirts to desperate fans.
Charlie Sheen Ticket
The show got off to somewhat of a rough start – beginning about 20 minutes late. I assumed it was just an indication of the disappointment that was yet to come. The mood in the theater did take a positive turn, however, when the 45-year-old actor made his entrance to a thundering guitar rendition of "Wild Thing." The crowd cheered as Sheen, decked out in a No. 99 Ricky Vaughn jersey and glasses, took to the stage.
Charlie Sheen
The actor barely got out a sentence before the rambunctious crowd began chanting "F--- Detroit" and "Winning."
Once the crowd settled down, Sheen took questions from a moderator in a talk show format and discussed everything from a bout with childhood stuttering – "[It] taught me how to listen, which we all have forgotten about" – to his three failed marriages: "It's got to be how you people feel about LeBron James," he joked.
Charlie Sheen
The former "Two and a Half Men" star also explained the "Sheenism," "Duh, winning," saying he was tired of "being told that I was losing."
Charlie Sheen
Sheen's "goddesses" – Rachel Oberlin and Natalie Kenly – made a brief 30-second appearance during the show. At one point, overzealous fans began chanting "Seven-gram rock! Seven-gram rock!" to which Sheen replied: "Sorry, goddesses, but that's the greatest f-----g moment of my life."
A seven-minute satirical clip of Sheen's interview, in which he coined some of his most quoted catchphrases such as: "I'm on a drug, it's called Charlie Sheen," was played during the show, much to the crowd's approval.
Charlie Sheen
Surprisingly, there wasn't any nudity during the act, even after Sheen pointed out several women in the audience that he thought were attractive. There was, however, one humorous moment when a buxom blond took off her shirt and threw it on stage, prompting Sheen to exchange tops with her. The woman never removed her bra, and it should be noted – as the Cleveland Plain Dealer pointed out last night – she looked as though she could have been one of the goddesses' moms.
All in all, I found the show pleasantly surprising. For someone who makes his living as an actor rather than as a comedian or talk show host, Sheen killed in Cleveland and walked out to a standing ovation. Unlike the ticket holders at the Detroit show – many of whom angrily demanded a refund – the guests at the Cleveland show, myself included, felt they got what they paid for.
Charlie Sheen
"It's a rocking night in Cleveland," Sheen himself noted prior to exiting the stage.
Photo Credits: Charlie Sheen smoking: WireImage/Getty Images; All others: Carla Lohr

Top Ten Crime Stories of 2009

January 04, 2010

Renowned crime writer David Lohr recounts the most high-profile and memorable crimes of 2009:

http://investigation.discovery.com/top-ten/year-in-review/top-crime-stories-of-2009.html

Posts Scheduled to Resume

December 28, 2009

Posts to this blog will resume again very soon. Please continue to check back!

David Lohr to Join Search for Mary Denise Lands

September 22, 2009

David LohrDavid Lohr will be joining several search and recovery groups, including Track Missing and Destiny Search Services, in Marshall, Michigan this coming weekend to help search for Mary Denise Lands.

Mary is a 39-year-old resident of Marshall who mysteriously disappeared on March 12, 2004.

The organized search will be held on Sept. 26, 2009. For more information, please visit: trackmissing.org.

Related Link:
The mysterious disappearance of Mary Denise Lands

Blog FYI

September 10, 2009

David's officeHello Readers,

I just wanted to give you a quick FYI as to what I am up to and why I have not been posting.

For the last few days I have been working on a new fansite for our upcoming show The Bureau – a new series that matches the intensity, captures the innovation and experiences the human drama and the passion that defines the modern FBI.

So far I have put together a list of the FBI's top 10 cases and a quiz on the history of the FBI. Tomorrow, I will be working on one of the final phases of the project. The site should be up soon. I will provide you with a link once it is finished.

That being said, please check out Gary C. King's latest article on China's new death mobile. Click here to read that story.

I look forward to providing you with the latest happenings in true crime beginning again next week. Until then, have fun and stay safe!

Regards,

David

Photo Credit: Discovery Communications

Christine Mannina Resumes Blogging for Investigation Discovery

August 26, 2009

Christina ManninaDetective Christine Mannina, formerly Minka, from Investigation Discovery's hit TV show The Shift, has resumed blogging for ID. Please be sure to visit her blog by clicking on the following link:

http://blogs.discovery.com/the_shift/

The Shift is a one-hour series that follows a team of homicide detectives at the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. Like every other big city, Indianapolis has its share of murders. Unlike many other cities, Indianapolis has an all-star squad of homicide detectives solving them and bringing justice to the victims.

At only 37-years-old, Detective Christine Mannina is one of the youngest homicide detectives in the field. With homicide, she feels as though she is working for the deceased to bring some sort of peace and closure to the victim's family. Detective Mannina enjoys the profession because she likes to be challenged on a daily basis; she wants to catch those criminals she considers to be the worst, murderers, and put them behind bars. Detective Mannina has been honored with several awards and citations, including Detective of the Year, Detective of the Month and, just recently, the Medal of Merit.

Click here for more information on The Shift

Related Links:
Investigation Discovery: TV Shows

Photo Credit: DCL

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission from Discovery Communications. All quotes must include a link back.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

Keep up with the latest in all things crime and criminals right here. Get the details on the Casey Anthony Trial and other daily reports as they unfold.
Advertisement

Advertisement

our sites

video

shop

stay connected

corporate