our networks
discovery channeltlcanimal planetscience channelmilitary channeldiscovery fit and health
shop now

Casey Anthony Questioned About Lawyer's Retainer

March 25, 2009

Casey Anthony Casey Anthony, mother of murdered two-year-old Caylee Anthony, appeared in court today in response to a prosecution motion that had been filed in regard to a possible conflict of interest involving Anthony and her lead attorney, Jose Baez.

In the motion, the state attorney's office stated it had concerns about how Anthony--someone who had little money prior to her arrest--had managed to secure a team of high-profile attorneys and expert witnesses. Of central concern was whether Anthony had sold the rights to her story to the media, something that could later be used as basis for appeal.

"The way to diffuse this issue right now is to make sure that the record is clear on exactly what the situation is, exactly what the financial arrangements are," Prosecutor Jeff Ashton said at the start of the 40-minute hearing.

In response, Baez questioned Ashton's reasoning behind the motion and said that he hoped it was not an excuse to uncover what avenue the defense would be taking and how much money they could afford to spend.

"They [prosecutors] need to be worried more about their convictions, more so than their post convictions," Baez said. "What they are doing in their motion is basically stating hypothetically, maybe possibly there is a conflict that exists, and we're telling you there's not."

Orange Circuit Court Judge Stan Strickland questioned Baez about his financial arrangement with Anthony, specifically regarding any book or movie deals, to which Baez responded by telling the court that he did not have a literary agreement with Anthony.

After questioning Baez, Strickland had Anthony sworn in and questioned her about an affidavit she had signed on March 10 regarding a retainer agreement with Baez. In questioning Anthony, Strickland was able to confirm that she had not entered into any other agreements with Baez or given him permission to sell her story.

Jose The hearing was then recessed, during which time Strickland met with counsel behind closed doors. Following that meeting, Strickland ruled that there was no conflict of interest between Anthony and Baez.

As the hearing came to an end, Baez asked Strickland to remind Ashton not to discuss the closed-door meeting with the press. Ashton was insulted by the request and said that he did not need a reminder. As a result of their bickering, Strickland interjected and said, "This is getting old."

Outside the courtroom, Baez told reporters that he was happy with the judge's ruling.

"We are glad this is behind us," Baez said. "I have told everyone all along the defense has not done anything unethical in any way, shape or form. These accusations are just that."

Meanwhile, California bounty hunter Leonard Padilla is still trying to purchase the land where Caylee's remains were found on Dec. 11. The asking price for the property is $89,000. According to one of Padilla's employees, he has offered $50,000 for the property. It is not yet known whether the owner is considering the offer. Padilla reportedly wants to build a missing children memorial on the property.

Discuss The Caylee Anthony Case

Full Coverage : Casey Anthony Case

Photo Credits: Casey Anthony Court: Associated Press; Jose Baez: Associated Press

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission from Discovery Communications. All quotes must include a link back.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

Keep up with the latest in all things crime and criminals right here. Get the details on the Casey Anthony Trial and other daily reports as they unfold.
Advertisement

Advertisement

our sites

video

shop

stay connected

corporate