Brian Rooney Convicted in Rape and Murder of Michelle Gardner-Quinn
May 30, 2008
Last week, on Thursday, May 22, 2008, the man charged with the rape-slaying of a University of Vermont student was found guilty of aggravated murder after the jury deliberated barely six hours. The randomness of the case, as well as the unprovoked, wanton violence involved, left many Vermont residents shaken.
Michelle Gardner-Quinn, 21, of Arlington, Vermont, was majoring in environmental studies when she transferred to the University of Vermont. She was only a few weeks into the fall semester when she disappeared on October 7, 2006. For the next six days police and volunteer search teams looked for any signs of the young coed throughout Burlington as well as the neighboring forests and countryside. Even the lake adjacent to the small city was searched, to no avail. Michelle had simply vanished, without a trace.
Her partially-clad body, however, was soon found by a hiker. It had been placed inside a gap between two large rocks in the hiking area at Huntington Gorge, and an attempt had been made to cover it up with leaves. An examination of her body showed that she had been sexually assaulted, beaten and strangled. Semen was collected from her body.
"This was a violent, random crime," said Chittenden County State's Attorney T.J. Donovan. "It scared a lot of people."
According to witnesses interviewed during the investigation, Michelle had been out with friends during homecoming weekend when she disappeared. At some point during the early morning hours, she became separated from her friends and was attempting to call one of them when her cellular phone's battery died. She apparently borrowed a cell phone from Brian Rooney, a 37-year-old construction worker and father, at approximately 2:35 a.m., during a random encounter. The ensuing investigation eventually linked Michelle to Rooney, and police found a videotape of them taken by a jewelry store surveillance camera as the two of them walked up Main Street in Burlington. Based on the depiction viewed on the tape, she did not appear distressed and it did not seem that she was in any immediate danger—but the time that the videotaped images were taken was the last time she was known to have been alive.
Despite the fact that there were no witnesses, investigators built a case against Rooney using the jewelry store video, inconsistent statements that he had made to the police and others and by using the most damning evidence of all—the fact that...
Continue Reading Brian Rooney Convicted in Rape and Murder of Michelle Gardner-Quinn
Photo credit: Police mug shot














I guess its kind of difficult to explain away DNA-matching semen on the womans body. What kind of chance occurance would make that happen????
Im not a proponent of the death penalty, but these cases push me close to supporting under law. Theres just no excuse.
Posted by: SD Mittelsteadt | June 04, 2008 at 09:38 PM
I would make his life a living...
Posted by: Greg Del Grande | September 15, 2008 at 02:49 PM
I just ask to put him in a room alone with me for 5 minutes!!
Posted by: Greg Del Grande | September 15, 2008 at 02:49 PM
They claimed a match that the DNA evidence does not support. They just wanted to clear a case and discovered they did not have the evidence. Meanwhile, in all likelihood, the killer in this case is on the street and a threat to the public.
Not all DNA tests are created equal.
I would like to know how the DNA sample(s) in this case were tested. Were they a CODIS/ autosomal test? YDNA test? Or mtDNA test? How many markers were used? If a mtDNA test was done, was a full genome sequencing done?
Is it a CODIS test? The CODIS system has been tested and there are perfect matches within the database of different persons.
Is it a mitochondrial DNA test which matches everyone who descended from the same maternal ancestor as THE DEFENDENT(S)?
Is it a Y Chromosome test which matches everyone who has the same paternal lineage for the past 400 years?
There may be a way to combine all of these that will resolve the identity to one person, but is what they have beyond a reasonable doubt unless they do FULL testing?
Posted by: John Lloyd Scharf | November 04, 2008 at 02:09 PM